Split-Award Auctions: Insights from Theory and Experiments
Published Online:28 Mar 2018https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2932
References
- (1992) Coordination in split award auctions. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):681–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1452–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Log-concave probability and its applications. Econom. Theory 26(2):445–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) The role of reverse auctions in strategic sourcing. Report, Center for Advanced Procurement Studies Research, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
- (2014) Split-award procurement auctions—Can Bayesian equilibrium strategies predict human bidding behavior in multi-object auctions? Production Oper. Management 24(6):1012–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Industrial procurement auctions. Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2011) Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):227–243.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Split-award auctions for supplier retention. Management Sci. 60(7):1719–1737.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Auctioning supply contracts. Management Sci. 53(10):1562–1576.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Optimal descending mechanisms for constrained procurement. Production Oper. Management 24(12):1955–1965.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Using spectrum auctions to enhance competition in wireless services. J. Law Econom. 54(4):167–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Managing procurement auctions. Inform. Econom. Policy 4(1):5–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) A laboratory investigation of rank feedback in procurement auctions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(1):128–144.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Regret in auction: Theory and evidence. Econom. Theory 33(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Regret and feedback information in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Management Sci. 54(4):808–819.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Collusion in dynamic buyer-determined reverse auctions. Management Sci. 62(2):518–533.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Increasing revenue by decreasing information in procurement auctions. Production Oper. Management 22(1):19–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Combinatorial and quantity-discount procurement auctions benefit mars, incorporated and its suppliers. Interfaces 33(1):23–35.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J. Marketing 67(3):96–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The impact of online reverse auction design on buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing 71(1):146–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Auctions: A survey of experimental research. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 563–637.Google Scholar
- Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. (1995) The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Time is money: The effect of clock speed on seller’s revenue in Dutch auctions. Experiment. Econom. 11(4):344–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Variable split awards in a single-stage procurement model. Group Decision Negotiation 4(4):295–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Auction Theory (Academic Press, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
- (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
- (1902) Note on Francis Galton’s problem. Biometrika 1(4):390–99.Google Scholar
- (2009) Multiple sourcing and procurement process selection with bidding events. Management Sci. 55(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) A simple result for the revenue in share auctions. Econom. Lett. 75(3):405–408.Crossref, Google Scholar

