Norm Uncertainty and Voluntary Payments in the Field

References

• Adena M, Huck S, Rasul I (2014) Charitable giving and nonbinding contribution-level suggestions—Evidence from a field experiment. Rev. Behav. Econom. 1(3):275–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agerström J, Carlsson R, Nicklasson L, Guntell L (2016) Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: The power of local norms. J. Econom. Psych. 52(February):147–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof G (1980) A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence. Quart. J. Econom. 94(3):749–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alpizar F, Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O (2008) Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. J. Public Econom. 92(5–6):1047–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altmann S, Falk A, Heidhues P, Jayaraman R (2016) Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a field experiment. Working paper, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Bernheim D (2009) Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Rao JM, Trachtman H (2017) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. J. Political Econom. 125(3):625–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2003) Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):73–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong Soule C, Madrigal R (2015) Anchors and norms in anonymous pay-what-you-want pricing contexts. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 57(August):167–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar O (2004) What sustains social norms and how they evolve? The case of tipping. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 54(1):49–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azar O (2007) The social norm of tipping: A review. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 37(2):380–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battigalli P, Dufwenberg M (2007) Guilt in games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):170–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim D (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102(5):841–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim D, Exley C (2015) Understanding conformity: An experimental investigation. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Bolton G, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang D, Chen R, Krupka E (2017) Rhetoric matters: A social identity explanation for the anomaly of framing. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Chao Y, Fernandez J, Nahata B (2015) Pay-what-you-want pricing: Can it be profitable? J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 57(August):176–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Cheung T (2013) A restaurant field experiment in charitable contributions. Econom. Lett. 119(1):48–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christakis N, Fowler J (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England J. Medicine 357:370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Engelmann J, Fehr E, Maréchal M (2015) Evidence for countercyclical risk aversion: An experiment with financial professionals. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):860–885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danilov A, Sliwka D (2017) Can contracts signal social norms? Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 63(2):459–476.Link, Google Scholar
• De Bruyn A, Prokopec S (2013) Opening a donor’s wallet: The influence of appeal scales on likelihood and magnitude of donation. J. Consumer Psych. 23(4):496–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List J, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desment P, Feinberg F (2003) Ask and ye shall receive: The effect of the appeals scale on consumers’ donation behavior. J. Econom. Psych. 24(3):349–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doob A, McLaughlin D (1989) Ask and you shall be given: Request size and donations to a good cause. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 19(12):1049–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Kirchsteiger G (2004) A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. 47(2):268–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards J, List J (2014) Toward an understanding of why suggestions work in charitable fundraising: Theory and evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Public Econom. 114(June):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2008) Pride and prejudice: The human side of incentive theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):990–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Exley C (2018) Incentives and procial behavior: The role of reputations. Management Sci. 64(5):2460–2471.Link, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldhaus C (2016) Social context and behavior under uncertainty. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Fischer P, Huddart S (2008) Optimal contracting with endogenous social norms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1459–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fowler J, Christakis N (2010) Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(12):5334–5338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey B, Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1717–1722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Schulz J (2016) Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies. Nature 531(7595):496–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Gerhards L, Nosenzo D (2017) The importance of peers for compliance with norms of fair sharing. Eur. Econom. Rev. 97(August):72–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Nelson L, Brown A (2010) Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science 329(5989):325–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Riener G, Nelson L (2012) Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(19):7236–7240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman Z (2015) Self-signaling and social-signaling in giving. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 117:26–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haggag K, Paci G (2014) Default tips. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 6(3):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Boyd R (1998) The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution Human Behav. 19(4):215–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Ensminger J (2014) Theoretical foundations—The coevolution of social norms, intrinsic motivation, markets, and the institutions of complex societies. Ensminger J, Henrich J, eds. Experimenting with Social Norms: Fairness and Punishment in Cross Cultural Perspective, Chap. 2 (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Jang H, Chu W (2012) Are consumers acting fairly toward companies? An examination of pay-what-you-want pricing. J. Macromarketing 32(4):348–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson JW, Cui AP (2013) To influence or not to influence: External reference price strategies in pay-what-you-want pricing. J. Bus. Res. 66(2):275–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler J, Leider S (2012) Norms and contracting. Management Sci. 58(1):62–77.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Kaufmann K, Stegemann M (2014) The impact of buyer-seller relationships and reference prices on the effectiveness of the pay what you want pricing mechanism. Marketing Lett. 25(4):409–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Natter M, Spann M (2009) Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. J. Marketing 73(1):44–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimbrough E, Vostroknutov A (2016) Norms make preferences social. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 14(3):608–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krupka E, Weber R (2009) The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior. J. Econom. Psych. 30(3):307–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krupka E, Weber R (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):495–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lòpez-Pèrez R (2008) Aversion to norm-breaking: A model. Games Econom. Behav. 64(1):237–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin R, Randal J (2008) How is donation behavior affected by the donations of others? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 67(1):228–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Ockenfels A (2013) Similarity increases altruistic punishment in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(48):19318–19323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Strack F (2000) Numeric judgments under uncertainty: The role of knowledge in anchoring. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 36(5):495–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson D (2008) Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 102(1):49–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Werner P (2014) Scale manipulation in dictator games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 97(January):138–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peysakhovich A, Rand D (2016) Habits of virtue. Creating norms of cooperation and defection in the laboratory. Management Sci. 62(3):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
• Regner T (2015) Why consumers pay voluntarily: Evidence from online music. J. Behav. Experiment. Econom. 57(August):205–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Regner T, Barria J (2009) Do consumers pay voluntarily? The case of online music. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 71(2):395–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Riedl A (2013) Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations. Games Econom. Behav. 77(1):122–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riener G, Traxler C (2012) Norms, moods, and free lunch: Longitudinal evidence on payments from a pay-what-you-want restaurant. J. Socio-Econom. 41(4):476–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schibrowsky J, Peltier J (1995) Decision frames and direct marketing offers: A field study in a fundraising context. J. Direct Marketing 9(1):8–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt K, Spann M, Zeithammer R (2015) Pay what you want as a marketing strategy in monopolistic and competitive markets. Management Sci. 61(6):1217–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N (1999) Self-reports—How the questions shape the answer. Amer. Psychologist 54(2):93–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Hippler H, Deutsch B, Strack F (1985) Response scales: Effects of category range on reported behavior and comparative judgments. Public Opinion Quart. 49(3):388–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shang J, Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econom. J. 119(540):1422–1439.Google Scholar
• Sliwka D (2007) Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):999–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weyant J, Smith S (1987) Getting more by asking for less: The effects of request size on donations of charity. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 17(4):392–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao E, Houser D (2011) Punish in public. J. Public Econom. 95(7–8):1006–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar