The Impact of E-book Distribution on Print Sales: Analysis of a Natural Experiment

References

• Amazon.com (2011) Amazon.com now selling more Kindle titles than print books. Press release, May 19, http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1565581.Google Scholar
• Association of American Publishers (2010) AAP reports October book sales. Press release, December 8, http://www.winterdigital.com/work/AAP_final/main/PressCenter/Archicves/2010_Dec/AAPReportsOctoberBookSales.htm.Google Scholar
• Association of American Publishers (2016) AAP StatShot: Publisher net revenue from book sales declines 2.0% through third quarter of 2015. Press release, January 27, http://newsroom.publishers.org/aap-statshot-publisher-net-revenue-from-book-sales-declines-20-through-third-quarter-of-2015.Google Scholar
• August T, Dao D, Shin H (2015) Optimal timing of sequential distribution: The impact of congestion externalities and day-and-date strategies. Marketing Sci. 34(5):755–774.Link, Google Scholar
• Avery J, Steenburgh TJ, Deighton J, Caravella M (2012) Adding bricks to clicks: Predicting the patterns of cross-channel elasticities over time. J. Marketing 76(3):96–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biyalogorsky E, Naik P (2003) Clicks and mortar: The effect of on-line activities on off-line sales. Marketing Lett. 14(1):21–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu YJ, Rahman MS (2009) Battle of the retail channels: How product selection and geography drive cross-channel competition. Management Sci. 55(11):1755–1765.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu YJ, Rahman MS (2013) Competing in the age of omnichannel retailing. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 54(4):23–29.Google Scholar
• Calzada J, Valletti TM (2012) Intertemporal movie distribution: Versioning when customers can buy both versions. Marketing Sci. 31(4):649–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2013) Regression Analysis of Count Data, Econometric Society Monograph No. 53, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnoy D (2010) Amazon: We have 70–80 percent of e-book market. CNET.com (August 2), https://www.cnet.com/news/amazon-we-have-70-80-percent-of-e-book-market/.Google Scholar
• Coster H (2006) The secret life of an online book reviewer. Forbes (December 1), https://www.forbes.com/2006/11/30/donald-mitchell-amazon-tech-media_cz_hc_books06_1201amazon.html.Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Smith MD, Telang R (2014) Piracy and copyright enforcement mechanisms. Lermer J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economics, Vol. 14 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 31–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Dhanasobhon S, Smith MD, Telang R (2010) Converting pirates without cannibalizing purchasers: The impact of digital distribution on physical sales and Internet piracy. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1138–1151.Link, Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Dhanasobhon S, Smith MD, Telang R (2015) Understanding media markets in the digital age: Economics and methodology. Goldfarb A, Greenstein SM, Tucker CE, eds. Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 385–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deleersnyder B, Geyskens I, Gielens K, Dekimpe MG (2002) How cannibalistic is the Internet channel? A study of the newspaper industry in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 19(4):337–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elberse A, Eliashberg J (2003) Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. 22(3):329–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Emmelhainz MA, Stock JR, Emmelhainz LW (1991) Consumer responses to retail stockouts. J. Retailing 67(2):138–147.Google Scholar
• Frambach R, Roest H, Krishnan T (2007) The impact of consumer Internet experience on channel preference and usage intentions across the different stages of the buying process. J. Interactive Marketing 21(2):26–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Smith MD, Telang R (2006) Internet exchanges for used books: An empirical analysis of product cannibalization and welfare impact. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):3–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Gong J, Smith MD, Telang R (2015) Substitution or promotion? The impact of price discounts on cross-channel sales of digital movies. J. Retailing 91(2):343–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau T, Henning V, Sattler H, Eggers F, Houston MB (2007) The last picture show? Timing and order of movie distribution channels. J. Marketing 71(4):63–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilbe JM (2011) Negative Binomial Regression (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillary M (2015) E-book or “real” book—Which should you publish first? Lulu (blog) (March 5), http://www.lulu.com/blog/2015/03/e-book-or-real-book-which-should-you-publish-first/.Google Scholar
• Hoffelder N (2015) Amazon has an even bigger share of the ebook market than we thought—Author earnings report. Digital Reader (October 9), http://the-digital-reader.com/2015/10/09/amazon-has-an-even-bigger-share-of-the-ebook-market-than-we-thought-author-earnings-report/.Google Scholar
• Kannan PK, Kline Pope B, Jain S (2009) Pricing digital content product lines: A model and application for the National Academies Press. Marketing Sci. 28(4):620–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Kotler P (2002) Marketing Management, 11th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lehmann DR, Weinberg CB (2000) Sales through sequential distribution channels: An application to movies and videos. J. Marketing 64(3):18–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luan YJ, Sudir K (2010) Forecasting marketing-mix responsiveness for new products. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):444–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K, Png I (1992) Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. 38(3):345–359.Link, Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Kadiyali V (2011) Modeling multichannel home video demand in the U.S. motion picture industry. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):985–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oberholzer-Gee F, Strumpf K (2010) File-sharing and copyright. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 10 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 19–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Bronnenberg B, Mahajan V (2004) Product entry timing in dual distribution channels: The case of the movie industry. Rev. Marketing Sci. 2(1), https://doi.org/10.2202/1546-5616.1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rich M (2009) Steal this book (for $9.99). New York Times (May 17):WK3.Google Scholar
• Rich M (2010) Math of publishing meets the e-book. New York Times (February 28), http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/business/media/01ebooks.html.Google Scholar
• Seeking Alpha (2009) Amazon.com, Inc. Q4 2008 earnings call transcript. (January 29), http://seekingalpha.com/article/117508-amazon-com-inc-q4-2008-earnings-call-transcript.Google Scholar
• Simester D, Hu YJ, Brynjolfsson E, Anderson E (2009) Dynamics of retail advertising: Evidence from a field experiment. Econom. Inquiry 47(3):482–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith M, Telang R (2009) Competing with free: The impact of movie broadcasts on DVD sales and Internet piracy. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 33(2):312–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vernik D, Purohit D, Desai P (2011) Music downloads and the flip side of digital rights management. Marketing Sci. 30(6):1011–1027.Link, Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2009) Lost on the web: Does web distribution stimulate or depress television viewing? Inform. Econom. Policy 21(2):158–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zentner A, Smith M, Kaya C (2013) How video rental patterns change as consumers move online. Management Sci. 59(11):2622–2634.Link, Google Scholar