Faithful Strategies: How Religion Shapes Nonprofit Management

References

• Agle BR, Mitchell RK, Sonnenfeld JA (1999) Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Acad. Management J. 42:507–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews KR (1980) The Concept of Corporate Strategy, 2nd ed. (Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
• Arrunada B (2009) Protestants and Catholics: Similar work ethic, different social ethic. Economic J. 120:890–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barro RJ, McCleary RM (2003) Religion and economic growth across countries. Amer. Soc. Rev. 68:760–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barro RJ, McCleary RM (2005) Which countries have state religions? Quart. J. Econom. 120:1331–1370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann M (2007) Researching religious diversity in Western Europe: The study of diaspora communities, religious conflict, and public domain in Germany and Switzerland. Nathan KS, ed. Religious Pluralism in Democratic Societies: Challenges and Prospects for Southeast Asia, Europe and the United States in the New Millennium (Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Singapore), 139–157.Google Scholar
• Becker SO, Woessmann L (2009) Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of Protestant economic history. Quart. J. Econom. 124:531–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL (2001) Reflections on the sociology of religion today. Sociol. Religion 62:425–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2005) Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95:616–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone C, Brouwer A, Jacobs J, van Witteloostuijn A, de Zwaan M (2012) Religious pluralism and organizational diversity: An empirical test in the city of Zwolle, the Netherlands, 1851–1914. Sociol. Religion 73:150–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busse R, Riesberg A (2004) Health Care Systems in Transition: Germany. WHO Regional Office for Europe on Behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
• Caritas (2011) Grundordnung des kirchlichen Dienstes im Rahmen kirchlicher Arbeitsverhältnisse Deutscher Caritasverband. http://www.caritas.de/glossare/grundordnung-des-kirchlichen-dienstes.Google Scholar
• Chan-Serafin S, Brief AP, George JM (2013) How does religion matter and why? Religion and the organizational sciences. Organ. Sci. 24:1585–1600.Link, Google Scholar
• Chin MK, Hambrick DC, Treviño LK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58:197–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Propper C, Smith S (2011) Management practices: Are not for profits different? Discussion Paper TI 2011-094/1, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Demerath NJ III, Schmitt T (1998) Transcending sacred and secular: Mutual benefits in analyzing religious and nonreligious organizations. Demerath NJ III, Hall PD, Schmitt T, Williams RH, eds. Sacred Companies: Organizational Aspects of Religion and Religious Aspects of Organizations (Oxford University Press, New York), 381–400.Google Scholar
• Diakonisches Werk (2014) Arbeitsrecht in Kirche und Diakonie. Last ac-cessed February 4, 2018, http://www.diakonie.de/arbeitsrecht-in-e-und-diakonie-9452.html.Google Scholar
• Dur R, Zoutenbier R (2011) Working for a good cause. Discussion Paper TI 2011-168/1, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggleston K, Shen YC, Lau J, Schmid CH, Chan J (2008) Hospital ownership and quality of care: What explains the different results in the literature? Health Econom. 17:1345–1362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellis RP (1998) Creaming, skimping and dumping: Provider competition on the intensive and extensive margins. J. Health Econom. 17:537–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filistrucchi L, Ozbugday FC (2012) Mandatory quality disclosure and quality supply: Evidence from German hospitals. TILEC Discussion Paper 2012-031, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Finke R, Stark R (1988) Religious economies and sacred canopies: Religious mobilization in American cities, 1906. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 53:41–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella A (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Francois P (2003) Not-for-profit provision of public services. Econom. J. 113:C53–C61.Google Scholar
• Francois P (2007) Making a difference. RAND J. Econom. 38:714–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francois P, Vlassopolous M (2008) Prosocial motivation and delivery of social services. CESifo Econom. Stud. 54:22–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gertler P, Kuan J (2009) Does it matter who your buyer is? The role of nonprofit mission in the market for corporate control of hospitals. J. Law Econom. 52:295–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser EL (2003) Introduction. Glaeser EL, ed. The Governance of Not-for-Profit Organizations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser EL, Glendon S (1998) Incentives, predestination and free will. Econom. Inquiry 36:429–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaeser EL, Sacerdote BI (2008) Education and religion. J. Human Capital 2:188–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9:193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansmann H (1980) The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law J. 89:835–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansmann H (1996) The Ownership of Enterprise (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hansmann H, Kessler D, McClellan M (2003) Ownership form and trapped capital in the hospital industry. Glaeser EL, ed. The Governance of Not-for-Profit Organizations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 45–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatten ML (1982) Strategic management in not-for-profit organizations. Strategic Management J. 3:89–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herbst P, Prüfer J (2016) Firms, nonprofits, and cooperatives: A theory of organizational choice. Ann. Public Coop. Econom. 87:315–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horwitz J (2007) Does nonprofit ownership matter? Yale J. Regulation 24:139–204.Google Scholar
• Horwitz J, Nichols A (2007) What do nonprofits maximize? Nonprofit hospital service provision and market ownership mix. NBER Working Paper 13246, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosmer LT (1994) Strategic planning as if ethics mattered. Strategic Management J. 15:17–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econom. J. 39:41–57.Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Ruback RS (1983) The market for corporate control. J. Financial Econom. 11:5–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King MD, Haveman HA (2008) Antislavery in America: The press, the pulpit, and the rise of antislavery societies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53:492–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirchmaier I, Prüfer J, Trautmann S (2017) Religion, moral attitudes, and economic behavior. Mimeo, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
• Klauber J, Robra BP, Schellschmidt H (2007) Krankenhaus-Report 2008 (Schattauer, Stuttgart).Google Scholar
• Klauber J, Geraedts M, Friedrich J (2010) Krankenhaus-Report 2010 (Schattauer, Stuttgart, Germany).Google Scholar
• Lam PY (2006) Religion and civic culture: A cross-national study of voluntary association membership. J. Sci. Study Religion 45:177–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrain M, Prúfer J (2015) Trade associations, lobbying, and endogenous institutions. J. Legal Anal. 7:467–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malani A, Philipson T, David G (2003) Theories of firm behavior in the nonprofit sector: A synthesis and empirical evaluation. Glaeser EL, ed. The Governance of Not-for-Profit Organizations (University of Chicago Press, London), 181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lee M (2013) Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large U.S. firms. Strategic Management J. 34:483–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller KD (2002) Competitive strategies of religious organizations. Strategic Management J. 23:435–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noussair CN, Trautmann S, Kuilen VDG, Vellekoop N (2013) Risk aversion and religion. J. Risk Uncertainty 47:165–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odom RY, Boxx WR (1988) Environment, planning processes, and organizational performance of churches. Strategic Management J. 9(2):197–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prüfer J (2011) Competition and mergers among nonprofits. J. Competition Law Econom. 7:69–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prüfer J (2016) Business associations and private ordering. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 32:306–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rennhoff AD, Owens MF (2012) Competition and the strategic choices of churches. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 4:152–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roeger KL, Blackwood AS, Pettijohn SL (2012) The Nonprofit Almanac 2012 (Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Rosenski N (2012) Die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung des Dritten Sektors. Wirtschaft und Statistik (March), 209–218.Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J (2002) Protestant relational ideology and (in)attention to relational cues in work settings. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83:919–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Burks J (2005) Protestant relational ideology: The cognitive underpinnings and organizational implications of an American anomaly. Res. Organ. Behav. 26:265–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider SC, De Meyer A (1991) Interpreting and responding to strategic issues: The impact of national culture. Strategic Management J. 12:307–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH, Huismans S (1995) Value priorities and religiosity in four western religions. Soc. Psych. Quart. 58:88–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senger J (1970) The religious manager. Acad. Management J. 13:179–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A, Sutton J (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49:3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shu T, Sulaeman J, Yeung PE (2012) Local religious beliefs and mutual fund risk-taking behaviors. Management Sci. 58:1779–1796.Link, Google Scholar
• Sloan FA (2000) Not-for-profit ownership and hospital behavior. Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, eds. Handbook of Health Economics (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1141–1174.Google Scholar
• Simon M (2010) Das Gesundheitssystem in Deutschland: Eine Einführung in Struktur und Funktionsweise., 3rd ed. (Huber, Bern).Google Scholar
• Spenkuch JL (2017) Religion and work: Micro evidence from contemporary Germany. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 135:193–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spenkuch JL, Tillmann P (2018) Elite influence? Religion and the electoral success of the Nazis. Amer. J. Political Sci. 62(1):19–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone MM, Brush CG (1996) Planning in ambiguous contexts: The dilemma of meeting needs for commitment and demands for legitimacy. Strategic Management J. 17:633–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomsen S, Pedersen T (2000) Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management J. 21:689–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tracey P (2012) Religion and organization: A critical review of current trends and future directions. Acad. Management Ann. 6:87–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Hoorn A, Maseland R (2013) Does a Protestant work ethic exist? Evidence from the well-being effect of unemployment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 91:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O (1979) Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. 22:233–261.Crossref, Google Scholar