Get with the Program: Software-Driven Innovation in Traditional Manufacturing

References

• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Wu DJ (2006) Which came first, IT or productivity? Virtuous cycle of investment and use in enterprise systems. Twenty Seventh Internat. Conf. on Inform. Systems, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1990) Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J. Indust. Econom. 38(4):361–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1994) The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Res. Policy 23(5):523–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Branstetter LG, Drev M (2013) Going soft: How the rise of software-based innovation led to the decline of Japan’s IT industry and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(3):757–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakal M (2011) Challenges and opportunities for the medical device industry: Meeting the new IEC 62304 standard. White paper, IBM Life Sciences, Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
• Bessen J, Hunt RM (2007) An empirical look at software patents. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(1):157–189.Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, El Sawy O, Pavlou P, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quart. 37(2):471–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brainard WC, Tobin J (1968) Pitfalls in financial model-building. Amer. Econom. Rev. 58(2):99–122.Google Scholar
• Branstetter LG, Sakakibara M (2002) When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(1):143–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branstetter LG, Drev M, Kwon N (2015) Get with the program: Software-driven innovation in traditional manufacturing. NBER Working Paper 21752, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M (1996) General purpose technologies: “engines of growth”? J. Econometrics, Ann. Econometrics 65:83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1995) Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences across firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 3(3–4):183–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McElheran K (2015) Data in action: Data driven decision making in U.S. manufacturing. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Byrne DM, Oliner SD, Sichel DE (2018) How fast are semiconductor prices falling? Review of Income Wealth 64(3):679–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caballero RJ, Jaffe AB (1993) How high are the giants’ shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. Blanchard O, Fischer S, eds. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Vol. 8 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 15–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Henderson R (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. 99(397):569–596.Google Scholar
• David PA (1991) The modern productivity paradox in a not-too-distant mirror. Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy, The Technology Economy Programmer (OECD Publishing, Paris), 315–347.Google Scholar
• Denger C, Feldmann RL, Host M, Lindholm C, Shull F (2007) A snapshot of the state of practice in software development in medical devices. Proc. First Internat. Sympos. Empirical Software Engrg. Measurement (IEEE, New York), 485–487.Google Scholar
• Drews J (2000) Drug discovery: A historical perspective. Science 287(5460):1960–1964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duardo-Sanchez A, Patlewicz G, Lopez-Diaz A (2008) Current topics on software use in medicinal chemistry: Intellectual property, taxes, and regulatory issues. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 8(18):1666–1675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frischkorn H-G (2004) Automotive software—The silent revolution. Talk at Automotive SW Workshop San Diego, January 10–12.Google Scholar
• Gassmann O, Reepmeyer G, Von Zedwitz M (2010) Leading Pharmaceutical Innovation: Trends and Drivers for Growth in the Pharmaceutical Industry (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Graham SJ, Mowery DC (2003) Intellectual property protection in the U.S. software industry. Cohen W, Merrill SA, eds. Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy (National Academies Press, Washington, DC), 219–258.Google Scholar
• Griffith R, Harrison R, Van Reenen J (2006) How special is the special relationship? Using the impact of US R&D spillovers on British firms as a test for technology sourcing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1859–1875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1981) Market value, R&D, and patents. Econom. Lett. 7(2):183–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z, Lichtenberg FR (1984) R&D and productivity growth at the industry level: Is there still a relationship? R&D, Patents, and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 465–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimm K (2003) Software technology in an automotive company—Major challenges. ICSE 2003 Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 498–503.Google Scholar
• Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S, Palaniswami M (2013) Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Comput. Systems 29(7):1645–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH (1990) The manufacturing sector master file: 1959–1987. NBER Working Paper 3366, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Kim D (2000) Valuing intangible assets: The stock market value of R&D revisited. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Oriani R (2006) Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 24(5):971–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helpman E, Trajtenberg M (1998a) A time to sow and a time to reap: Growth based on general purpose technologies. Helpman E, ed. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth (MIT Press, Cambridge MA), 55–83.Google Scholar
• Helpman E, Trajtenberg M (1998b) Diffusion of general purpose technologies. Helpman E, ed. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth (MIT Press, Cambridge MA), 85–119.Google Scholar
• Holden C (1986) Regulating software for medical devices. Science 234(4772):20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holloway CM, Hayhurst KJ (2003) Software system safety and the NASA aeronautics blueprint. Proc. 21st Internat. System Safety Conf. (International System Safety Society, Unionville, VA).Google Scholar
• Hughes D (1998) Informational technology: This changes everything. Aviation Week and Space Tech. (December 21/28).Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Lakhani KR (2014) Digital ubiquity: How connections, sensors, and data are revolutionizing business. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(11):90–99.Google Scholar
• Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (1996) Flows of knowledge from universities and federal labs: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. NBER Working Paper 5712, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2002) Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joglekar NR, Rosenthal SR (2003) Coordination of design supply chains for bundling physical and software products. J. Product Innovation Management 20(5):374–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones P, Jetley R, Abraham J (2010) A formal methods-based verification approach to medical device software analysis. Embedded.com (February 9), https://www.embedded.com/design/prototyping-and-development/4008888/A-Formal-Methods-based-verification-approach-to-medical-device-software-analysis.Google Scholar
• Kahn A (1991) The Changing Economics of Medical Technology (Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Kruize JW, Wolfert J, Scholten H, Verdouw CN, Kassahun A, Beulens AJ (2016) A reference architecture for Farm Software Ecosystems. Comput. Electronics in Agriculture 125:12–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Seru A (2014) The use and abuse of patent data. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lohr S (2016) G.E. is moving headquarters to Boston and itself into the digital era. New York Times (January 13), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/14/technology/ge-boston-headquarters.html.Google Scholar
• Long LN (2008) The critical need for software engineering education. Crosstalk—J. Defense Software Engrg. (January):6–10.Google Scholar
• Long LN (2012) Introduction to software engineering (course syllabus, spring). Department of Aerospace Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
• Mai-Duc C (2011) Medical device software criticized as under-regulated. Los Angeles Times (September 1), http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/01/nation/la-na-fda-devices-20110901.Google Scholar
• Mustapic G, Wall A, Norstrom C, Crnkovic I, Sandstrom K, Froberg J, Andersson J (2004) Real world influences on software architecture—Interviews with industrial system experts. Proc. Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conf. Software Architecture (IEEE, New York), 101–111.Google Scholar
• Nelson E (2004) Defining interfaces as services in embedded vehicle software. Talk at Automotive SW Workshop, San Diego, January 10–12.Google Scholar
• Pakes A, Griliches Z (1984) Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. Griliches Z, ed. R&D, Patents, and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Perfect SB, Wiles KW (1994) Alternative constructions of Tobin’s Q: An empirical comparison. J. Empirical Finance 1(3–4):313–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Potocki de Montalk JP (1993) Computer software in civil aircraft. Microprocessors and Microsystems 17(1):17–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Regalado A (2014) The Internet of things. MIT Tech. Rev. (July/August), https://www.technologyreview.com/business-report/the-internet-of-things/.Google Scholar
• Sandler K, Ohrstrom L, Moy L, McVay R (2010) Killed by code: Software transparency in implantable medical devices. Working paper, Software Freedom Law Center, New York.Google Scholar
• Searls DB (2000) Using bioinformatics in gene and drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 5(4):135–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sedgwick D (2015) A new breed of software engineer. Automotive News (August 3), http://www.autonews.com/article/20150803/OEM10/308039979/a-new-breed-of-software-engineer.Google Scholar
• Shorey R (2011) Emerging trends in vehicular communications. IEEE New York Presentation (June 8).Google Scholar
• Soibelman L, Kim H (2002) Data preparation process for construction knowledge generation through knowledge discovery in databases. J. Comput. Civil Engrg. 6(1):39–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tobin J (1969) A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory J. Money, Credit Banking 1(1):15–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (2001) Innovation in Israel, 1968–1997: A comparative analysis using patent data. Res. Policy 30(3):363–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasden C, (2011) Navigating through the mobile healthcare revolution. Medical Device and Diagnostic Indust. (April).Google Scholar