Consumer Subsidies with a Strategic Supplier: Commitment vs. Flexibility

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2962

References

  • Alizamir S, de Véricourt F, Sun P (2016) Efficient feed-in-tariff policies for renewable energy technologies. Oper. Res. 64(1):52–66.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anand K, Anupindi R, Bassok Y (2008) Strategic inventories in vertical contracts. Management Sci. 54(10):1792–1804.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aviv Y, Pazgal A (2008) Optimal pricing of seasonal products in the presence of forward-looking consumers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):339–359.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Babich V (2010) Independence of capacity ordering and financial subsidies to risky suppliers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(4):583–607.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnes-Schuster D, Bassok Y, Anupindi R (2002) Coordination and flexibility in supply contracts with options. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 4(3):171–207.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Feldman P (2015) Price commitments with strategic consumers: Why it can be optimal to discount more frequently? Than optimal. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(3):399–410.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Swinney R (2009) The impact of strategic consumer behavior on the value of operational flexibility. Netessine S, Tang CS, eds. Consumer-Driven Demand and Operations Management Models (Springer, New York), 371–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caro F, Martínez-de-Albéniz V (2010) The impact of quick response in inventory-based competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):409–429.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chick SE, Hasija S, Nasiry J (2014) Incentive alignment and information elicitation from manufacturers for public goods procurement. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
  • Chod J, Rudi N (2005) Resource flexibility with responsive pricing. Oper. Res. 53(3):532–548.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chod J, Pyke D, Rudi N (2010) The value of flexibility in make-to-order systems: The effect of demand correlation. Oper. Res. 58(4, Part 1):834–848.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M, Lobel R, Perakis G (2016) The impact of demand uncertainty on consumer subsidies for green technology adoption. Management Sci. 62(5):1235–1258.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MC, Perakis G, Thraves C (2017) The effects of competition in green technology adoption. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment Under Uncertainty (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elmaghraby W, Gülcü A, Keskinocak P (2008) Designing optimal preannounced markdowns in the presence of rational customers with multiunit demands. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(1):126–148.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erhun F, Keskinocak P, Tayur S (2008) Dynamic procurement, quantity discounts, and supply chain efficiency. Production Oper. Management 17(5):543–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goyal M, Netessine S (2011) Volume flexibility, product flexibility, or both: The role of demand correlation and product substitution. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):180–193.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Granot D, Yin S (2007) On sequential commitment in the price-dependent newsvendor model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177(2):939–968.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho TH, Savin S, Terwiesch C (2002) Managing demand and sales dynamics in new product diffusion under supply constraint. Management Sci. 48(2):187–206.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes JE, Podolefsky M (2015) Getting green with solar subsidies: Evidence from the California Solar Initiative. J. Assoc. Environment. Resource Economists 2(2):235–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingersoll JE Jr, Ross SA (1992) Waiting to invest: Investment and uncertainty. J. Bus. 65(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaya M, Özer Ö (2012) Pricing in business to business contracts: Sharing risk, profit and information. Özer Ö, Phillips R, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim SH, Netessine S (2013) Collaborative cost reduction and component procurement under information asymmetry. Management Sci. 59(1):189–206.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kök AG, Shang K, Yücel Ş (2018) Impact of electricity pricing policies on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Management Sci. 64(1):131–148.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krass D, Nedorezov T, Ovchinnikov A (2013) Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1035–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kulatilaka N, Perotti EC (1998) Strategic growth options. Management Sci. 44(8):1021–1031.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Taylor TA, Whang S (2000) Price protection in the personal computer industry. Management Sci. 46(4):467–482.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, McCardle KF (1997) The competitive newsboy. Oper. Res. 45(1):54–65.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu H, Özer Ö (2010) Channel incentives in sharing new product demand information and robust contracts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(3):1341–1349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lobel I, Patel J, Vulcano G, Zhang J (2015) Optimizing product launches in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Sci. 62(6):1778–1799.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lobel R, Perakis G (2017) Consumer choice model for forecasting demand and designing incentives for solar technology. Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Lutze H, Özer Ö (2008) Promised lead-time contracts under asymmetric information. Oper. Res. 56(4):898–915.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mamani H, Adida E, Dey D (2012) Vaccine market coordination using subsidy. IIE Trans. Healthcare Systems Engrg. 2(1):78–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olsen TL, Parker RP (2014) On Markov equilibria in dynamic inventory competition. Oper. Res. 62(2):332–344.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raz G, Ovchinnikov A (2015) Coordinating pricing and supply of public interest goods using rebates and subsidies. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 62(1):65–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sallee JM (2011) The surprising incidence of tax credits for the Toyota Prius. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 3(2):189–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • See CT, Sim M (2010) Robust approximation to multiperiod inventory management. Oper. Res. 58(3):583–594.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seel J, Barbose GL, Wiser RH (2014) An analysis of residential {PV} system price differences between the united states and Germany. Energy Policy 69:216–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor TA, Xiao W (2014) Subsidizing the distribution channel: Donor funding to improve the availability of malaria drugs. Management Sci. 60(10):2461–2477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor TA, Xiao W (2017) Donor product-subsidies to increase consumption: Implications of consumer awareness and profit-maximizing intermediaries. Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  • Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2012) Public incentives for green innovation. Working paper, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  • Yin R, Aviv Y, Pazgal A, Tang CS (2009) Optimal markdown pricing: Implications of inventory display formats in the presence of strategic customers. Management Sci. 55(8):1391–1408.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.