A Bridge Too Far: Divestiture as a Strategic Reaction to Status Inconsistency

References

• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang J, De Jong A, Van der Poel M (2014) Does familiarity with business segments affect CEOs’ divestment decisions? J. Corporate Finance 29:58–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Baetschmann G, Staub KE, Winkelmann R (2015) Consistent estimation of the fixed effects ordered logit model. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 178(3):685–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (2005) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PG, Hann R (2003) The impact of SFAS No. 131 on information and monitoring. J. Accounting Res. 41(2):163–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PG, Ofek E (1995) Diversification’s effect on firm value. J. Financial Econom. 37(1):39–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PG, Ofek E (1999) Causes and effects of corporate refocusing programs. Rev. Financial Stud. 12(2):311–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergh DD (1995) Size and relatedness of units sold: An agency theory and resource-based perspective. Strategic Management J. 16(3):221–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergh DD (1997) Predicting divestiture of unrelated acquisitions: An integrative model of ex ante conditions. Strategic Management J. 18(9):715–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M (2011) Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus internal mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):369–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(5):1170–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kang J, Stuart TE (2007) Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):208–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Podolny JM, Smith EB (2011) Organizing contests for status: The Matthew effect vs. the Mark effect. Management Sci. 57(3):439–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Brauer M (2006) What have we acquired and what should we acquire in divestiture research? A review and research agenda. J. Management 32(6):751–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellucci F, Ertug G (2010) What’s in it for them? Advantages of higher-status partners in exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 53(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang SJ, Singh H (1999) The impact of modes of entry and resource fit on modes of exit by multibusiness firms. Strategic Management J. 20(11):1019–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Wernerfelt B (1991) The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management J. 12(1):33–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleves MA, Gould WW, Gutierrez RG, Marchenko YU (2008) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata (Stata Press Publication, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Collet F, Philippe D (2014) From hot cakes to cold feet: A contingent perspective on the relationship between market uncertainty and status homophily in the formation of alliances. J. Management Stud. 51(3):406–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowen AP (2012) An expanded model of status dynamics: The effects of status transfer and interfirm coordination. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1169–1186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellestrand H, Kappen P (2012) The effects of spatial and contextual factors on headquarters resource allocation to MNE subsidiaries. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(3):219–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmestri G, Greenwood R (2016) How Cinderella became a queen: Theorizing radical status change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4): 507–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimov D, Shepherd DA, Sutcliffe KM (2007) Requisite expertise, firm reputation, and status in venture capital investment allocation decisions. J. Bus. Venturing 22(4):481–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duhaime IM, Grant JH (1984) Factors influencing divestment decision-making: Evidence from a field study. Strategic Management J. 5(4):301–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertug G, Castellucci F (2013) Getting what you need: How reputation and status affect team performance, hiring, and salaries in the NBA. Acad. Management J. 56(2):407–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun C, Shanley M (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. 33(2):233–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Zhang CM (2017) Institutional logics and power sources: Merger and acquisition decisions. Acad. Management J. 60(2):671–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen BL, Pahnke EC (2016) When do entrepreneurs accurately evaluate venture capital firms’ track records? A bounded rationality perspective. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1535–1560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1974) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms (Harcourt Brace, New York).Google Scholar
• Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA (1994) Downscoping: How to Tame the Diversified Firm (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT, Koçak Ö (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2003) The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks’ entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):466–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2006) Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(1):97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2010) Legitimizing illegitimacy: How creating market identity legitimizes illegitimate products. Res. Sociol. Organ. 31:39–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim BK (2014) Great, Madame Butterfly again! How robust market identity shapes opera repertoires. Organ. Sci. 25(1): 109–126.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim H (2015) The real Oscar curse: The negative consequences of positive status shifts. Organ. Sci. 26(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Roy A (2008) Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Management J. 51(3):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Wang P (2018) Not in the same boat: How status inconsistency affects research performance in business schools. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print February 20, https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amj.2015.0969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim BK, Kim H (2011) The importance of status in markets: A market identity perspective. Pearce JJ, ed. Status in Management and Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 87–117.Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Kim H, Kim BK (2012) Meeting expectations: A role-theoretic perspective on reputation. Barnett ML, Pollock TG, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 140–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Madhavan R (2010) Divestiture and firm performance: A meta-analysis. J. Management 36(6):1345–1371.Google Scholar
• Lenski GE (1954) Status crystallization: A non-vertical dimension of social status. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 19(4):405–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung MD, Sharkey AJ (2013) Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence of perceptual factors in the multiple-category discount. Organ. Sci. 25(1):171–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Markides CC (1992) Consequences of corporate refocusing: Ex ante evidence. Acad. Management J. 35(2):398–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marr JC, Thau S (2014) Falling from great (and not-so-great) heights: How initial status position influences performance after status loss. Acad. Management J. 57(1):223–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810): 56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Thomas AR, Kamath R (1984) Divestiture, market valuation, and strategy. Acad. Management J. 27(4):830–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozmel U, Reuer JJ, Gulati R (2013) Signals across multiple networks: How venture capital and alliance networks affect interorganizational collaboration. Acad. Management J. 56(3):852–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolella L, Durand R (2016) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pforr K (2014) Femlogit—Implementation of the multinomial logit model with fixed effects. Stata J. 14(4):847–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Philippe D, Durand R (2011) The impact of norm-conforming behaviors on firm reputation. Strategic Management J. 32(9):969–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Kim YK (2009) Why pseudonyms? Deception as identity preservation among jazz record companies, 1920–1929. Organ. Sci. 20(3):481–499.Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1023–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piao M, Zajac EJ (2016) How exploitation impedes and impels exploration: Theory and evidence. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1431–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piazza A, Castellucci F (2014) Status in organization and management theory. J. Management 40(1):287–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plangger K (2012) The power of popularity: How the size of a virtual community adds to firm value. J. Public Affairs 12(2):145–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plummer LA, Allison TH, Connelly BL (2016) Better together? Signaling interactions in new venture pursuit of initial external capital. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1585–1604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):458–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2005) Status Signals (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Phillips DJ (1996) The dynamics of organizational status. Industrial Corporate Change 5(2):453–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Gulati R (2007) Standing out from the crowd: The visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organ. 5(4):339–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5):631–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Lee PM, Jin K, Lashley K (2015) (Un)tangled: Exploring the asymmetric coevolution of new venture capital firms’ reputation and status. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):482–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin how ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee M, Haunschild PR (2006) The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organ. Sci. 17(1):101–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1974) The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Admin. Sci. Quart. 19(4):453–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlingemann FP, Stulz RM, Walkling RA (2002) Divestitures and the liquidity of the market for corporate assets. J. Financial Econom. 64(1):117–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sgourev SV, Zuckerman EW (2011) Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network. Rationality Soc. 23(1):3–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharkey AJ (2014) Categories and organizational status: The role of industry status in the response to organizational deviance. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(5):1380–1433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen R, Tang Y, Chen G (2014) When the role fits: How firm status differentials affect corporate takeovers. Strategic Management J. 35(13):2012–2030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Hitt MA (2005) What constrains or facilitates divestitures of formerly acquired firms? The effects of organizational inertia. J. Management 31(1):50–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith EB (2011) Identity as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’ evaluation of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):61–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen AB (1996) The structural basis of social inequality. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(5):1333–1365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Rumelt R, Dosi G, Winter S (1994) Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 23(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ter Wal AL, Alexy O, Block J, Sandner PG (2016) The best of both worlds: The benefits of open-specialized and closed-diverse syndication networks for new ventures’ success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):393–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Therneau TM, Grambsch PM (2013) Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A (2014) Imprint-environment fit and performance: How organizational munificence at the time of hire affects subsequent job performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):639–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE (2011) Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Wan WP, Hoskisson RE, Short JC, Yiu DW (2011) Resource-based theory and corporate diversification accomplishments and opportunities. J. Management 37(5):1335–1368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washington M, Zajac EJ (2005) Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. 48(2):282–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams R (2015) Heteroscedasticity. Working paper, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
• Xuan Y (2009) Empire-building or bridge-building? Evidence from new CEOs’ internal capital allocation decisions. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(12):4919–4948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Zhou X (2011) Status inconsistency and product valuation in the California wine market. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1435–1448.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar