Open Source Software and Firm Productivity

References

• Acharya RC (2015) ICT use and total factor productivity growth: Intangible capital or productive externalities? Oxford Econom. Papers 68(1):16–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman E, Nagle F, Tushman M (2014) Innovating without information constraints: Organizations, communities, and innovation when information costs approach zero. Hitt MA, Shalley C, Zhou J, eds. Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (Oxford University Press, New York), 353–378.Google Scholar
• Andreessen M (2011) Why software is eating the world. Wall Street Journal (August 20), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111903480904576512250915629460.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Wu L (2012) Three-way complementarities: Performance pay, human resource analytics, and information technology. Management Sci. 58(5):913–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asay M (2013) Is Facebook the world’s largest open source company? ReadWrite (October 17), http://readwrite.com/2013/10/17/is-facebook-the-worlds-largest-open-source-company.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Ellison G (2014) Dynamics of open source movements. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):294–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1399–1417.Link, Google Scholar
• Bardhan I, Krishnan V, Lin S (2013) Business value of information technology: Testing the interaction effect of IT and R&D on Tobin’s q. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1147–1161.Link, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y (2002) Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law J. 112(3):369–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black Duck Software (2014) The Eighth Annual Future of Open Source Survey. Accessed October 31, 2014, https://www.blackducksoftware.com/future-of-open-source.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bridgman B (2013) Home productivity. Bureau of Economic Analysis Working Paper 2013-03, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):793–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Milgrom P (2012) Complementarity in organizations. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ), 11–55.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Saunders A (2009) What the GDP gets wrong (why managers should care). Sloan Management Rev. 51(1):95–96.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM, Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 2002(1):137–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne D, Oliner S, Sichel D (2013) Is the information technology revolution over? Internat. Productivity Monitor 25(Spring), 20–36.Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Llanes G (2011) Mixed source. Management Sci. 57(7):1212–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang YB, Gurbaxani V (2012) Information technology outsourcing, knowledge transfer, and firm productivity: An empirical analysis. MIS Quart. 36(4):1043–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corrado C, Hulten R (2013) Innovation accounting. Jorgenson DW, Landefeld JS, Schreyer P, eds. Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress, Chap. 18 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Corrado C, Hulten C, Sichel D (2009) Intangible capital and US economic growth. Rev. Income Wealth 55(3):661–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cragg JG, Donald SG (1993) Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variable models. Econometric Theory 9(2):222–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Min CK (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Sci. 43(12):1660–1675.Link, Google Scholar
• Finley K (2013) Apple’s operating system guru goes back to his roots. Wired (August 8), www.wired.com/2013/08/jordan-hubbard/.Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald B (2006) The transformation of open source software. MIS Quart. 30(3):587–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C (2005) The corporate digital divide: Determinants of Internet adoption. Management Sci. 51(4):641–654.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. J. Urban Econom. 58(3):389–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2008) Understanding the inputs into innovation: Do cities substitute for internal firm resources? J. Econom. Management Strategy 17(2):295–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A, Giarratana MS, Luzzi A (2008) The penguin has entered the building: The commercialization of open source software products. Organ. Sci. 19(2):292–305.Link, Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Porter ME, Stern S (2002) The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy 31(6):899–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartner (2010) Forecast: PC market by operating system, worldwide, 2001–2009. Report, Gartner, Stamford, CT.Google Scholar
• Giera J, Brown A (2004) The costs and risks of open source—Debunking the myths. White paper, Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gilder G (1995) The coming software shift. Forbes (August 28), 154.Google Scholar
• Graham R (2014) 300k vulnerable to Heartbleed two months later. Errata Security (blog) (June 21), http://blog.erratasec.com/2014/06/300k-vulnerable-to-heartbleed-two.html.Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Nagle F (2014) Digital dark matter and the economic contribution of Apache. Res. Policy 43(4):623–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hamilton D (2014) Mirantis gains $100M in the largest series-B investment round in open-source software history. Whir (October 21), http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/mirantis-gains-100m-largest-series-b-investment-round-open-source-software-history.Google Scholar
• Han K, Mithas S (2013) Information technology outsourcing and non-IT operating costs: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 37(1):315–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han K, Kauffman RJ, Nault BR (2011) Returns to information technology outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):824–840.Link, Google Scholar
• Hann I, Roberts J, Slaughter S (2013) All are not equal: An examination of the economic returns to different forms of participation in open source software communities. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):520–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Hann I, Roberts J, Slaughter S, Fielding R (2002) Economic incentives for open source projects: Can participation be explained by career concerns? Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS), Barcelona, Spain, 365–372.Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Henkel J, von Hippel E (2003) Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res. Policy 32(10):1753–1769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35(4):519–530.Google Scholar
• Henkel J (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux. Res. Policy 35(7):953–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirano K, Imbens GW, Ridder G (2003) Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71(4):1161–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. 20(2):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ (1952) A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 47(260):663–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe J (2008) Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Huang P, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Wu DJ (2016) IT knowledge spillovers, absorptive capacity, and productivity: Evidence from enterprise software. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Huber M (2013) Identifying causal mechanisms (primarily) based on inverse probability weighting. J. Appl. Econometrics 29(6):920–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hulten C (2010) Decoding Microsoft: Intangible capital as a source of company growth. NBER Working Paper 15799, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Kolesar M (2016) Robust standard errors in small samples: Some practical advice. Rev. Econom. Statist. 98(4):701–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jorgenson DW (2001) Information technology and the US economy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jorgenson DW, Ho MS, Stiroh KJ (2005) Productivity, Information Technology and the American Growth Resurgence, Vol. 3 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Metiu A (2001) Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 17(2):248–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy S (2005) An analysis of open source business models. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani K, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA),279–296.Google Scholar
• Lakhani K, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani K, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Tushman M (2012) Open innovation and organizational boundaries. Grandori A, ed. Handbook of Economic Organization: Integrating Economic and Organization Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 355–382.Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Schankerman M (2010) The Comingled Code: Open Source and Economic Development (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Pathak PA, Tirole J (2006) The dynamics of open-source contributors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):114–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(2):317–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li WCY, Hall BH (2016) Depreciation of business R&D capital. NBER Working Paper 22473, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lindenberg EB, Ross SA (1981) Tobin’s q and industrial organization. J. Bus. 54(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A (2003) Evaluating total cost of ownership for software platforms: Comparing apples, oranges, and cucumbers. AEI-Brookings Center for Regulatory Studies Related Publication, AEI, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• McCue TJ (2013) Ford Motor Company sees open source. Forbes (January 10), http://www.forbes.com/sites/tjmccue/2013/01/10/ford-motor-company-sees-open-source/.Google Scholar
• McElheran KS (2014) Delegation in multi-establishment firms: Adaptation vs. coordination in I.T. purchasing authority. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):225–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newbart D (2001) Microsoft CEO takes launch break with the Sun-Times. Chicago Sun-Times (June 1), https://web.archive.org/web/20011115003306/http://www.suntimes.com/output/tech/cst-fin-micro01.html.Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S (2003) Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy 32(7):1179–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1079–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pang MS, Lee G, DeLone WH (2014) IT resources, organizational capabilities, and value creation in public-sector organizations. J. Inform. Tech. 29(3):187–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phipps S (2014) Walmart’s investment in open source isn’t cheap. InfoWorld (August 22), http://www.infoworld.com/article/2608897/open-source-software/walmart-s-investment-in-open-source-isn-t-cheap.html.Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S (2010) An empirical analysis of exploitation attempts based on vulnerabilities in open source software. Proc. 9th Workshop Econom. Inform. Security, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Raymond E (1999) The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Tech. Policy 12(3):23–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo B, Braghin B, Gasperi P, Sillitti A, Succi G (2005) Defining TCO for the transition to open source systems. Proc. First Internat. Conf. Open Source Systems, 108–112.Google Scholar
• Saunders A, Brynjolfsson E (2016) Valuing IT-related intangible assets. MIS Quart. 40(1):83–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) The process of creative destruction. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York), 81–86.Google Scholar
• Schwarz M, Takhteyev Y (2011) Half a century of public software institutions. J. Public Econom. Theory 12(4):609–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shirky C (2008) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations (Penguin Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sorkin A, Peters J (2006) Google to acquire YouTube for $1.65 billion. New York Times (3, Part 1), http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/09/business/09cnd-deal.html.Google Scholar
• Stiroh KJ (2002) Information technology and the US productivity revival: What do the industry data say? Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1559–1576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Syverson C (2011) What determines productivity? J. Econom. Literature 49(2):326–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt L, Brynjolfsson E (2011) The price and quantity of IT-related intangible capital. ICIS 2011 Proceed. 16. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/economicvalueIS/16.Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Varian HR, Shapiro C (2003) Linux adoption in the public sector: An economic analysis. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Nichols SJ (2016) Why Microsoft is turning into an open-source company. ZDNet (June 9), http://www.zdnet.com/article/why-microsoft-is-turning-into-an-open-source-company/Google Scholar
• Villalonga B (2004) Intangible resources, Tobin’s q, and sustainability of performance differences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 54(4):205–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vrionis J (2015, December 6) It’s actually open source software that’s eating the world. VentureBeat (December 6), http://venturebeat.com/2015/12/06/its-actually-open-source-software-thats-eating-the-world/.Google Scholar
• West J, Lakhani KR (2008) Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Indust. Innovation 15(2):223–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• WhatsApp (2016) WhatsApp and Open Source. Accessed March 23, 2016, https://web.archive.org/web/20160304091651/whatsapp.com/opensource.Google Scholar
• Wheeler D (2005) Why open source software/free software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the numbers! Accessed September 25, 2017, http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html.Google Scholar
• Woods D, Guliani G (2005) Open Source for the Enterprise: Managing Risks, Reaping Rewards (O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Inverse probability weighted M-estimators for sample selection, attrition, and stratification. Portuguese Econom. J. 1(2):117–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2007) Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. J. Econometrics 141(2):1281–1301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Fuchs E (2011) Collective intelligence in the organization of science. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1359–1367.Link, Google Scholar
• Yarow J (2013) Microsoft’s biggest problem in one chart. Bus. Insider (September 13), http://www.businessinsider.com/microsofts-biggest-problem-in-one-chart-2013-9.Google Scholar