Multidimensional Bargaining and Inventory Risk in Supply Chains: An Experimental Study

References

• Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann UW (2013) Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Sci. 59(8):1800–1816.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Karagözoǧlu E (2016) On the influence of hard leverage in a soft leverage bargaining leverage program: The importance of credible claims. Games Econom. Behav. 99(September):164–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Graves S, de Kok T, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 227–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP (2004) The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: Push, pull and advance-purchase discount contracts. Management Sci. 50(2):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Fisher M (1997) Campbell’s Soup’s continuous replenishment program: Evaluation and enhanced inventory decision rules. Production Oper. Management 6(3):266–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Fisher M (2000) Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Sci. 46(8):1032–1048.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Leider SG (2018) Contracts and capacity investment in supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(3):403–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis A, Katok E, Santamaría N (2014) Push, pull, or both? A behavioral study of how the allocation of inventory risk affects channel efficiency. Management Sci. 60(11):2666–2683.Link, Google Scholar
• Devlin A, Elmaghraby W, Hamilton RW (2014) The effect of contract type on retailer’s willingness to accept product risk. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donohue K, Zhang Y, Cui T (2016) Contract preferences and performance for the loss averse supplier: Buyback versus revenue sharing. Management Sci. 62(6):1734–1754.Link, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Riedl A (2005) Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible claims. Management Sci. 51(2):249–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Mussweiler T (2001) First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(4):657–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E, Katok E, Pavlov V (2017) Bargaining process and channel efficiency. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Roth AE (1995) The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Chen K-Y, Erhun F (2011) Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information: An experimental evaluation. Management Sci. 57(4):689–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Wu D (2009) Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Sci. 55(12):1953–1968.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaya M, Özer Ö (2012) Pricing in business-to-business contracts: Sharing risk, profit and information. Özalp Ö, Phillips R, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 738–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YS, Siemsen E (2017) Task decomposition and newsvendor decision making. Management Sci. 63(10):3226–3245.Link, Google Scholar
• Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2016) Bargaining in supply chains. Management Sci. 62(10):3039–3058.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy WS (2010) Bargaining chains. Management Sci. 56(12):2282–2301.Link, Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Rudi N (2006) Supply chain choice on the Internet. Management Sci. 52(6):844–864.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer O, Wei W (2006) Strategic commitment for optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Sci. 52(8):1238–1257.Link, Google Scholar
• Ramachandran K, Tereyaǧoǧlu N, Xia Y (2018) Multidimensional decision making in operations: An experimental investigation of joint pricing and quantity decisions. Management Sci. 64(12):5544–5558.Google Scholar
• Randall T, Netessine S, Rudi N (2002) Should you take the virtual fulfillment path? Supply Chain Management Rev. 6(November/December):54–58.Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Malouf MWK (1979) Game-theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining. Psych. Rev. 86(6):574–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.Link, Google Scholar