The Value of Personal Information in Online Markets with Endogenous Privacy

References

• Acquisti A, Varian H (2005) Conditioning prices on purchases history. Marketing Sci. 14(3):367–381.Link, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Taylor C, Wagman L (2016) The economics of privacy. J. Econom. Literature 54(2):442–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Recent developments in the economics of price discrimination. Blundell R, Newey W, Persson T, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Vol. 2, Chap. 4 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 97–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Peitz M (2010) Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• BlueKai O (2018) Oracle BlueKai platform/exchange FAQs—How does the auction work? What can I expect to pay? Accessed May 20, 2018, https://docs.oracle.com/en/cloud/saas/data -cloud/dsmkt/oracle-bluekai-platform-exchange-faqs.html #GUID-418EDA59-1BD9-40F6-9D57-DD7C266FF.Google Scholar
• Burke J, Taylor C, Wagman L (2012) Information acquisition in competitive markets: An application to the U.S. mortgage market. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 4(4):65–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Hervas-Drane A (2015) Competing with privacy. Management Sci. 61(1):229–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y (1999) Oligopoly price discrimination and resale price maintenance. RAND J. Econom. 30(3):441–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Iyer G (2002) Consumer addressability and customized pricing. Marketing Sci. 22(2):197–208.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhang T (2011) Equilibrium price dispersion with heterogeneous searchers. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 29(6):645–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Narasimhan C, Zhang ZJ (2001) Individual marketing with imperfect targetability. Marketing Sci. 20(1):23–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Coase R (1972) Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. 15(1):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conitzer V, Taylor C, Wagman L (2012) Hide and seek: Costly consumer privacy in a market with repeat purchases. Marketing Sci. 31(2):277–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Esteves R (2010) Pricing with customer recognition. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(6):669–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ezrachi A, Stucke M (2016) Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission [FTC] (2014) Data brokers: A call for transparency and accountability. Report, FTC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission [FTC] (2016) Big data: A tool for inclusion or exclusion? Understanding the issues. Report, FTC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (2000) Customer poaching and brand switching. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):634–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Villas-Boas J (2012) Price discrimination in the digital economy. Peitz M, Waldgofel J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 254–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Laibson D (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E (1985) Information sharing in oligopoly. Econometrica 53(2):329–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2012) Shifts in privacy concerns. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 102(3):349–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer J (1971) The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 61(4):561–574.Google Scholar
• Isidore C (2015) RadioShack sale protects most customer data. CNN Money (June 10), http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/10/news/companies/radioshack-customer-data-sale/index.html.Google Scholar
• Jehiel P, Moldovanu B (2000) Auctions with downstream interaction among buyers. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):768–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang C (2016) F.C.C. proposes privacy rules for internet providers. New York Times (March 10), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/—SQ03/11/technology/fcc-proposes-privacy-rules-for-internet-providers.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Koh B, Raghunathan S, Nault B (2017) Is voluntary profiling welfare enhancing? MIS Quart. 41(1):23–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane J, Stodden V, Bender S, Nissenbaum H (2014) Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Serfes K (2006) Customer information sharing among rival firms. Eur. Econom. Rev. 50(6):1571–1600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattioli D (2012) On Orbitz, Mac users steered to pricier hotels. Wall Street Journal (August 23), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304458604577488822667325882.Google Scholar
• Mayer J (2012) Tracking the trackers: Early results. The Center for Internet and Society (July 12), http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2011/07//tracking-trackers-early-results.Google Scholar
• Mikians J, Gyarmati L, Erramilli V, Laoutaris N (2012) Detecting price and search discrimination on the Internet. Proc. 11th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (ACM, New York), 79–84.Google Scholar
• Mikians J, Gyarmati L, Erramilli V, Laoutaris N (2013) Crowd-assisted search for price discrimination in e-commerce: First results. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Emerging Networking Experiments Technol. (ACM, New York), 1–6.Google Scholar
• Pancras J, Sudhir K (2007) Optimal marketing strategies for a customer data intermediary. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):560–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasquale F (2014) The dark market for personal data. New York Times (October 16), http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/17/opinion/the-dark-market-for-personal-data.html?_r=1.Google Scholar
• Ponssard J (1979) The strategic role of information on the demand function in an oligopolistic market. Management Sci. 25(3):243–250.Link, Google Scholar
• Posner R (1981) The economics of privacy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(2): 405–409.Google Scholar
• Shelanski H (2013) Information, innovation, and competition policy for the Internet. University of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 161(6):1663–1705.Google Scholar
• Shen Q, Villas-Boas JM (2018) Behavior-based advertising. Management Sci. 64(5):2047–2064.Link, Google Scholar
• Shy O, Stenbacka R (2016) Customer privacy and competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy 25(3):539–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler G (1980) An introduction to privacy in economics and politics. J. Legal Stud. 9(4):623–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stole L (2007) Price discrimination and competition. Armstrong M, Porter R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. III, Chap. 34 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2221–2299.Google Scholar
• Taylor C (2004) Consumer privacy and the market for customer information. RAND J. Econom. 35(4):631–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Wagman L (2014) Customer privacy in oligopolistic markets: Winners, losers, and welfare. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 34(May):80–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thisse J, Vives X (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):122–137.Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Valentino-DeVries J, Singer-Vine J, Soltani A (2012) Websites vary prices, deals based on users’ information. Wall Street Journal (December 24), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323777204578189391813881534.Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J (1999) Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J (2004) Price cycles in markets with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. 35(3):486–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vives X (1984) Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. J. Econom. Theory 34(1):71–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weeds H (2016) TV wars: Exclusive content and platform competition in pay TV. Econom. J. 126(594):1600–1633.Google Scholar