The More You Know: Information Effects on Job Application Rates in a Large Field Experiment

References

• Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9):1082–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3003–3037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Ubaydli O, List JA (2015) On the generalizability of experimental results in economics. Fréchette GR, Schotter A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economic Methodology (Oxford University Press, New York), 420–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson LR, Holt CA (1997) Information cascades in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(5):847–862.Google Scholar
• Anik L, Norton MI, Ariely D (2014) Contingent match incentives increase donations. J. Marketing Res. 51(6):790–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M (2011) New perspectives on gender. Card D, Ashenfelter O, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4, Part B (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1543–1590.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bougheas S, Nieboer J, Sefton M (2013) Risk-taking in social settings: Group and peer effects. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 92(August):273–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chade H, Smith L (2006) Simultaneous search. Econometrica 74(5):1293–1307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Lu F, Zhang J (2017) Social comparisons, status and driving behavior. J. Public Econom. 155(November):11–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on MovieLens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):1015–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman LC, Featherstone CR, Kessler JB (2017) Can social information affect what job you choose and keep? Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 9(1):96–117.Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Shang JY (2008) The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions. Experiment. Econom. 11(3):221–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das S, Tsitsiklis JN (2010) When is it important to know you’ve been rejected? A search problem with probabilistic appearance of offers. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 74(12):104–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deming DJ, Yuchtman N, Abulafi A, Goldin C, Katz LF (2016) The value of postsecondary credentials in the labor market: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(3):778–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):556–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008) Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1061–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson S, Rooth D-O (2014) Do employers use unemployment as a sorting criterion when hiring? Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(3):1014–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fradkin A (2017) Search, matching, and the role of digital marketplace design in enabling trade: Evidence from Airbnb. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing” conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1717–1722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galenianos M, Kircher P (2009) Directed search with multiple job applications. J. Econom. Theory 144(2):445–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garratt RJ, Weinberger C, Johnson N (2013) The state street mile: Age and gender differences in competition aversion in the field. Econom. Inquiry 51(1):806–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunasti K, Ross WT (2009) How inferences about missing attributes decrease the tendency to defer choice and increase purchase probability. J. Consumer Res. 35(5):823–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy Y, Feltkamp V (2005) A Bayesian approach to uncertainty aversion. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(2):449–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallsworth M, List JA, Metcalfe RD, Vlaev I (2017) The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. J. Public Econom. 148(April):14–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellerstein JK, Neumark D, Troske KR (2002) Market forces and sex discrimination. J. Human Resources 37(2):353–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoxby C, Turner S (2013) Expanding college opportunities for high-achieving, low income students. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 12-014, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Kohavi R, Deng A, Longbotham R, Xu Y (2014) Seven rules of thumb for web site experimenters. Proc. 20th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM, New York), 1857–1866.Google Scholar
• Kohn M, Shavell S (1974) The theory of search. J. Econom. Theory 9(2):93–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroft K, Lange F, Notowidigdo MJ (2013) Duration dependence and labor market conditions: Evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 128(3):1123–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahey JN (2008) Age, women, and hiring an experimental study. J. Human Resources 43(1):30–56.Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Shaw KL, Stanton CT (2018) Who gets hired? The importance of competition among applicants. J. Labor Econom. 36(S1):S133–S181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do women avoid salary negotiations? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Management Sci. 61(9):2016–2024.Link, Google Scholar
• List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2016) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. NBER Working Paper 21875, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin R, Randal J (2008) How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 67(1):228–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Pallais A (2016) Valuing alternative work arrangements. NBER Working Paper 22708, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• McGregor J (2014) 2% of Google employees are black and just 30% are women. Forbes (May 29), https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaymcgregor/2014/05/29/2-of-google-employees-are-black-and-just-30-are-women/#7904359b490e.Google Scholar
• Mobius M, Rosenblat T (2014) Social learning in economics. Annual Rev. Econom. 6(1):827–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore E, Eckel C (2003) Measuring ambiguity aversion. Working paper, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery, AL.Google Scholar
• Mortensen DT (1970) Job search, the duration of unemployment, and the Phillips curve. Amer. Econom. Rev. 60(5):847–862.Google Scholar
• Nachman DC (1975) Risk aversion, impatience, and optimal timing decisions. J. Econom. Theory 11(October):196–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumark D, Bank RJ, Van Nort KD (1996) Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. Quarterly J. Econom. 101(3):915–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oreopoulos P (2011) Why do skilled immigrants struggle in the labor market? A field experiment with thirteen thousand resumes. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 3(3):148–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petit P (2007) The effects of age and family constraints on gender hiring discrimination: A field experiment in the French financial sector. Labour Econom. 14(3):371–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (2006) An experimental investigation of sexual discrimination in hiring in the English labor market. Adv. Econom. Anal. Policy 5(2):1–22.Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2008) What have we learned from market design? Econom. J. 118(527):285–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samek AS (2015) A university-wide field experiment on gender differences in job entry decisions. Working paper, Center for Economic and Social Research, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Schubert R, Brown M, Gysler M, Brachinger HW (1999) Financial decision-making: Are women really more risk-averse? Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(2):381–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shang J, Croson R (2006) The impact of social comparisons on nonprofit fundraising. Res. Experiment. Econom. 11:143–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith L, Sørensen PN (2011) Observational learning. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online Edition (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK), 29–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith S, Windmeijer F, Wright E (2015) Peer effects in charitable giving: Evidence from the (running) field. Econom. J. 125(585):1053–1071.Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Telser LG (1973) Searching for the lowest price. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(2):40–49.Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Ours J, Ridder G (1992) Vacancies and the recruitment of new employees. J. Labor Econom. 10(2):138–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandegrift D, Yavas A (2009) Men, women, and competition: An experimental test of behavior. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 72(1):554–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber A, Zulehner C (2010) Female hires and the success of start-up firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(2):358–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber A, Zulehner C (2014) Competition and gender prejudice: Are discriminatory employers doomed to fail? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(2):492–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yechiam E, Druyan M, Ert E (2008) Observing others’ behavior and risk taking in decisions from experience. Judgment Decision Making 3(7):493–500.Crossref, Google Scholar