Team Creativity, Cognition, and Cognitive Style Diversity

References

• Aggarwal I, Woolley AW (2013) Do you see what I see? The effect of members’ cognitive styles on team processes and errors in task execution. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(1):92–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1982) Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43(5):997–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10(1):123–167.Google Scholar
• Ancona D, Bresman H (2007) X-Teams: How to Build Teams That Lead, Innovate, and Succeed (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Anderson N, Potočnik K, Zhou J (2014) Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J. Management 40(5):1297–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Ren Y (2012) Transactive memory systems: A microfoundation of dynamic capabilities. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1375–1382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong SJ, Priola V (2001) Individual differences in cognitive style and their effects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams. Small Group Res. 32(3):283–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashby WR (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ausburn LJ, Ausburn FB (1978) Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design. Educational Tech. Res. Development 26(4):337–354.Google Scholar
• Austin JR (1997) A cognitive framework for understanding demographic influences in groups. Internat. J. Organ. Anal. 5(4):342–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. 10:107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basadur M, Hausdorf PA (1996) Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Res. J. 9(1):21–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blazhenkova O, Kozhevnikov M (2008) The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 23(5):638–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blazhenkova O, Kozhevnikov M (2010) Visual-object ability: A new dimension of non-verbal intelligence. Cognition 117(3):276–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blazhenkova O, Becker M, Kozhevnikov M (2011) Object–spatial imagery and verbal cognitive styles in children and adolescents: Developmental trajectories in relation to ability. Learn. Individual Differences 21(3):281–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blazenkova O, Kozhevnikov M, Motes MA (2006) Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 20(2):239–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohns VK, Higgins ET (2011) Liking the same things, but doing things differently: Outcome versus strategic compatibility in partner preferences for joint tasks. Soc. Cognition 29(5):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Castellan NJ, ed. Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 221–246.Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers JA, Tannenbaum SI, Salas E, Volpe CE (1995) Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. Guzzo RA, Salas E, eds. Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 333–381.Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Diószegi B (2015) Social networks, cognitive style and innovative performance: A contingency perspective. Acad. Management J. 58(3):881–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chabris CF, Jerde TE, Woolley AW, Gerbasi ME, Schuldt JP, Bennett SL, Hackman JR, Kosslyn SM (2006) Spatial and Object Visualization Cognitive Styles: Validation Studies in 3,800 Individuals (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cox TH, Blake S (1991) Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. The Executive 5(3):45–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin MA, Weingart LR (2007) Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):761–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropley A (2006) In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Res. J. 18(3):391–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damon W (1991) Problems of direction in socially shared cognition. Resnick LB, Levine JM, Teasley SD, eds. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (American Psychological Association, Washington DC), 384–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeChurch LA, Mesmer-Magnus JR (2010) The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):32–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, West MA (2001) Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1191–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Nijstad BA, van Knippenberg D (2008) Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 12(1):22–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Jong BA, Elfring T (2010) How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Acad. Management J. 53(3):535–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM (2007) Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):439–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson LL, Shalley CE (2004) A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. J. Management 30(4):453–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Argote L, Miron-Spektor E, Todorova G (2010) First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111(2):102–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman JC, Cooke NJ (2011) Changes in team cognition after a retention interval: The benefits of mixing it up. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 17(4):303–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Morris CG (1975) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 8:45–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hayes J, Allinson CW (1998) Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations 51(7):847–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennessey BA, Amabile TM (1999) Consensual assessment. Runco MA, Pritzker SR, eds. Encyclopedia of Creativity (Academic Press, San Diego), 347–359.Google Scholar
• Hinsz VB (1990) Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(4):705–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinsz VB, Tindale RS, Vollrath DA (1997) The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psych. Bull. 121(1):43–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoever IJ, van Knippenberg D, van Ginkel WP, Barkema HG (2012) Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. J. Appl. Psych. 97(5):982–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB (1998) Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 34(5):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, Buengeler C, Eckhoff RA, van Ginkel WP, Voelpel SC (2015) The interplay of diversity training and diversity beliefs on team creativity in nationality diverse teams. J. Appl. Psych. 100(5):1456–1467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hülsheger UR, Anderson N, Salgado JF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1128–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson SE, Joshi A (2011) Work team diversity. Zedeck S, ed. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Vol. 1 (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC),651–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson SE, Joshi A, Erhardt NL (2003) Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J. Management 29(6):801–830.Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonassen DH, Grabowski B (1993) Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Roh H (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Acad. Management J. 52(3):599–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:623–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirstetter E, Eagar R, Kolk M, Roos D (2013) The creativity era—A new paradigm for business. Prism 2013(2):12–29.Google Scholar
• Klimoski R, Mohammed S (1994) Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? J. Management 20(2):403–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight D, Pearce CL, Smith KG, Olian JD, Sims HP, Smith KA, Flood P (1999) Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management J. 20(5):445–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov M (2007) Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psych. Bull. 133(3):464–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov M, Evans C, Kosslyn SM (2014) Cognitive style as environmentally sensitive individual differences in cognition—A modern synthesis and applications in education, business, and management. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 15(1):3–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory Cognition 33(4):710–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov M, Louchakova O, Josipovic Z, Motes MA (2009) The enhancement of visuospatial processing efficiency through Buddhist deity meditation. Psych. Sci. 20(5):645–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW, Bell BS (2003) Work groups and teams in organizations. Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ, eds. Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12 (John Wiley & Sons, London), 333–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kravitz DA (2005) Diversity in teams a two-edged sword requires careful handling. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 6(2):i–ii.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langan-Fox J, Code S, Langfield-Smith K (2000) Team mental models: Techniques, methods, and analytic approaches. Human Factors: J. Human Factors Ergonom. Soc. 42(2):242–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR (2010) In Search of Synergy in Small Group Performance (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Levine JM, Moreland RL (2004) Collaboration: The social context of theory development. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(2):164–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine JM, Smith ER (2013) Group cognition: Collective information search and distribution. Carlston D, ed. Oxford Handbook Social Cognition (Oxford University Press, New York), 616–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine JM, Resnick LB, Higgins ET (1993) Social foundations of cognition. Annual Rev. Psych. 44(1):585–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2003) Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):587–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Herndon B (2011) Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1254–1265.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang DW, Moreland R, Argote L (1995) Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(4):384–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lonergan DC, Scott GM, Mumford MD (2004) Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Res. J. 16(2–3):231–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, More PH, Faraj S (2012) Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organ. Sci. 23(4):951–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Mannix E, Neale MA (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 6(2):31–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L (2008) Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Management 34(3):410–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matousek J (2002) Lectures on Discrete Geometry (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• McLeod PL, Lobel SA, Cox TH (1996) Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Res. 27(2):248–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mello AL, Rentsch JR (2015) Cognitive diversity in teams: A multidisciplinary review. Small Group Res. 46(6):623–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Erez M, Naveh E (2011) The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Acad. Management J. 54(4):740–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Harrison DA (2013) The clocks that time us are not the same: A theory of temporal diversity, task characteristics, and performance in teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(2):244–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Klimoski R, Rentsch JR (2000) The measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema. Organ. Res. Methods 3(2):123–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL (1999) Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Thompson LL, Levine JM, Messick DM, eds. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL (2006) Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Levine JM, Moreland RL, eds. Small Groups: Key Readings (Psychology Press, New York), 327–346.Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Myaskovsky L (2000) Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Argote L, Krishnan R (2002) Training people to work in groups. Tindale RS, ed. Theory and Research on Small Groups: Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues, Vol. 4 (Springer, New York), 37–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Levine JM, Wingert ML (1996) Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. Davis J, Witte E, eds. Understanding Group Behavior, Vol. 2 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 11–35.Google Scholar
• Mullen B (1983) Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 19(4):295–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullen B (1987) Self-attention theory: The effects of group composition on the individual. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer-Verlag, New York), 125–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullen B (1991) Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 27(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth CJ (1992) Minority dissent as a stimulant to group performance. Worchel S, Wood W, Simpson JA, eds. Group Process and Productivity (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 95–111.Google Scholar
• Neuberg SL, Newsom JT (1993) Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(1):113–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, De Dreu CK (2012) Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects. Res. Organ. Behav. 32:87–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, Levine JM (2007) Group creativity and the stages of creative problem solving. Hewstone M, Schut HA, de Wit JB, van den Bos K, Stroebe MS, eds. The Scope of Social Psychology: Theory and Applications (Psychology Press, New York), 159–172.Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, Diehl M, Stroebe W (2003) Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea generating groups. Paulus PB, Nijstad BA, eds. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, New York), 137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Williams KY, Barsade S (1998) Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help? Mannix EA, Gruenfeld DH, eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 183–207.Google Scholar
• Paletz SB, Pavisic I, Miron-Spektor E, Lin CC (2018) Diversity in creative teams: Reaching across cultures and disciplines. Kwan LYY, Liou S, Leung AKY, eds. Handbook of Culture and Creativity (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus P (2000) Groups, Teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Appl. Psych. 49(2):237–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB, Nijstad BA (2003) Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi V (2008) Transactive memory systems. Rev. General Psych. 12(4):378–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieterse AN, van Knippenberg D, van Ginkel WP (2011) Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 114(2):153–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pil FK, Cohen SK (2006) Modularity: Implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):995–1011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):189–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resick CJ, Murase T, Randall KR, DeChurch LA (2014) Information elaboration and team performance: Examining the psychological origins and environmental contingencies. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 124(2):165–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reus TH, Liu Y (2004) Rhyme and reason: Emotional capability and the performance of knowledge-intensive work groups. Human. Performance 17(2):245–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riding R, Cheema I (1991) Cognitive styles—An overview and integration. Ed. Psych. 11(3–4):193–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riding RJ, Ashmore J (1980) Verbaliser-imager learning style and children’s recall of information presented in pictorial versus written form. Ed. Stud. 6(2):141–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudin W (1987) Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Runco MA (2003) Critical Creative Processes (Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ).Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management 30(6):933–958.Google Scholar
• Shea GP, Guzzo RA (1987) Groups as human resources. Rowland KM, Ferris GR, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 5 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 323–356.Google Scholar
• Shemla M, Meyer B, Greer LL, Jehn KA (2016) A review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team’s composition affect team processes and outcomes? J. Organ. Behav. 37(S1):S89–S106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Zhou J (2007) When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1709–1721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch KA, Mathieu JE, Kraiger K (2005) Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. J. Appl. Psych. 90(3):523–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somech A, Drach-Zahavy A (2013) Translating team creativity to innovation implementation the role of team composition and climate for innovation. J. Management 39(3):684–708.Google Scholar
• Sorkin RD, Hays CJ, West R (2001) Signal-detection analysis of group decision making. Psych. Rev. 108(1):183–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sternberg RJ (2014) Introduction: Adopted at last! Psych. Sci. Public Interest 15(1):1–2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sung SY, Choi JN (2012) Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(1):4–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson L (2003) Improving the creativity of organizational work groups. Acad. Management Executive 17(1):96–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijk H, van Engen ML, van Knippenberg D (2012) Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 119(1):38–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58:515–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CK, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals JR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer, New York), 185–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Cummings LL, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77–140.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge B, Floyd SW (1989) Research notes and communications strategic process effects on consensus. Strateg. Management J. 10(3):295–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW (2009a) Means vs. ends: Implications of process and outcome focus for team adaptation and performance. Organ. Sci. 20(3):500–515.Link, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW (2009b) Putting first things first: Outcome and process focus in knowledge work teams. J. Organ. Behav. 30(3):427–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Hackman JR, Jerde TE, Chabris CF, Bennett SL, Kosslyn SM (2007) Using brain-based measures to compose teams: How individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance. Soc. Neurosci. 2(2):96–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Maloney MM, Bhappu AD, Salvador RB (2008) When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(1):41–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Shalley CE (2008) Expanding the scope and impact of organizational creativity research. Zhou J, Shalley CE, eds. Handbook of Organizational Creativity (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York), 125–147.Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Shalley CE (2010) Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. Zedeck S, Aguinis H, Cascio W, Gelfand M, Leung K, Parker S, Zhou J, eds. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1 (American Psychological Association, Washington DC), 275–302.Google Scholar