Dynamic Agency and Endogenous Risk-Taking

References

• Biais B, Casamatta C (1999) Optimal leverage and aggregate investment. J. Finance 54(4):1291–1323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Mariotti T, Rochet J-C (2013) Dynamic financial contracting. Acemoglu D, Arellano M, Dekel E, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Tenth World Congress, Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, New York), 125–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Mariotti T, Plantin G, Rochet J-C (2007) Dynamic security design: Convergence to continuous time and asset pricing implications. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):345–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Mariotti T, Rochet J-C, Villeneuve S (2010) Large risks, limited liability, and dynamic moral hazard. Econometrica 78(1):73–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier M (2009) Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008. J. Econom. Perspect. 23(1):77–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvitanić J, Zhang J (2012) Contract Theory in Continuous-Time Models (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Cvitanić J, Possamai D, Touzi N (2017) Moral hazard in dynamic risk management. Management Sci. 63(10):3328–3346.Link, Google Scholar
• DeMarzo P, Sannikov Y (2006) Optimal security design and dynamic capital structure in a continuous-time agency model. J. Finance 61(6):2681–2724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeMarzo P, Livdan D, Tchistyi A (2014) Risking other people’s money: Gambling, limited liability, and optimal incentives. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• DeMarzo P, Fishman M, He Z, Wang N (2012) Dynamic agency and the q theory of investment. J. Finance 67(6):2295–2340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drechsler I (2014) Risk choice under high-water marks. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(7):1–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z (2009) Optimal executive compensation when firm size follows geometric Brownian motion. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):859–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann F, Pfeil S (2010) Reward for luck in a dynamic agency model. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(9):3329–3345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann F, Pfeil S (2017) Dynamic multitasking and managerial investment incentives model. Working paper, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Karatzas I, Sherve S (1991) Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy A (2010) How debt markets have malfunctioned in the crisis. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(2):3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolokolova O, Mattes A (2015) Recovering managerial risk-taking from daily hedge funds returns: Incentives at work? Working paper, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
• Lan Y, Wang N, Yang J (2013) The economics of hedge funds. J. Financial Econom. 110(2):300–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miao J, Rivera A (2016) Robust contracts in continuous time. Econometrica 84(4):1405–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreno-Bromberg S, Roger G (2016) Leverage and risk-taking. Working paper, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Oksendal B, Sulem A (2005) Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diffusions (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Panageas S, Westerfield M (2009) High-water marks: High risk appetites? Convex compensation, long horizons, and portfolio choice. J. Finance 64(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piskorski T, Tchistyi A (2010) Optimal mortgage design. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(8):3098–3140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piskorski T, Westerfield MM (2016) Optimal dynamic contracts with moral hazard and costly monitoring. J. Econom. Theory 166(November):242–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Roger G (2016) Risky utilities. Econom. Theory 62(1):361–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sannikov Y (2008) A continuous-time version of the principal–agent problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(3):957–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sannikov Y (2012) Dynamic security design and corporate financing. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of Economics and Finance, Vol. 2A (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 71–122.Google Scholar
• Shelef O (2012) Incentive thresholds, risk-taking, and performance—Evidence from hedge funds. Working paper, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
• Sung J (1995) Linearity with project selection and controllable diffusion rate in continuous-time principal-agent problems. RAND J. Econom. 26(4):720–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szydlowski M (2016) Incentives, project choice, and dynamic multitasking. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Varas F (2018) Managerial short-termism, turnover policy, and the dynamics of incentives. Rev. Financial Stud. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams N (2011) Persistent private information. Econometrica 79(4):1233–1274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams N (2015) A solvable continuous time dynamic principal–agent model. J. Econom. Theory 159(part B):989–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y (2009) Dynamic contracting with persistent shocks. J. Econom. Theory 144(2):635–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu JY (2013) Optimal contracts with shirking. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(2):812–839.Crossref, Google Scholar