Measuring Decreasing and Increasing Impatience

References

• Abdellaoui M, Attema AE, Bleichrodt H (2010) Intertemporal tradeoffs for gains and losses: An experimental measurement of discounted utility. Econom. J. 120(545):845–866.Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, l’Haridon O (2013) Sign-dependence in intertemporal choice. J. Risk Uncertainty 47(3):225–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ameriks J, Caplin A, Leahy J, Tyler T (2007) Measuring self-control problems. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):966–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Sprenger C (2012) Estimating time preferences form convex budgets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3333–3356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attema AE (2012) Developments in time preference and their implications for medical decision making. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 63(10):1388–1399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attema AE, Bleichrodt H, Rohde KIM, Wakker PP (2010) Time-tradeoff sequences for analyzing discounting and time inconsistency. Management Sci. 56(11):2015–2030.Link, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Heukamp FH (2012) Probability and time trade-off. Management Sci. 58(4):831–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Benoît J-P, Ok EA (2007) Delay aversion. Theoret. Econom. 2(1):71–113.Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Gao Y, Rohde KIM (2016) A measurement of decreasing impatience for health and money. J. Risk Uncertainty 52(3):213–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Rohde KIM, Wakker PP (2009) Non-hyperbolic time inconsistency. Games Econom. Behav. 66(1):27–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Kothiyal A, Prelec D, Wakker PP (2013) Compound invariance implies prospect theory for simple prospects. J. Math. Psych. 57(3–4):68–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benhabib J, Bisin A, Schotter A (2010) Present-bias, quasi-hyperbolic discounting, and fixed costs. Games Econom. Behav. 69(2):205–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burks SV, Carpenter JP, Goette L, Rustichini A (2009) Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(19):7745–7750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burks S, Carpenter J, Götte L, Rustichini A (2012) Which measures of time preference best predict outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84(1):308–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cairns J, van der Pol M (2000) Valuing future private and social benefits: The discounted utility model versus hyperbolic discounting models. J. Econom. Psych. 21(2):191–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courtemanche C, Heutel G, McAlvanah P (2015) Impatience, incentives and obesity. Econom. J. 125(582):1–31.Google Scholar
• Delaney L, Lades LK (2017) Present bias and everyday self-control failures: A day reconstruction study. J. Behav. Decision Making 30(5):1157–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert JEJ, Prelec D (2007) The fragility of time: Time-insensitivity and valuation of the near and far future. Management Sci. 53(9):1423–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Epper T, Fehr-Duda H, Bruhin A (2011) Viewing the future through a warped lens: Why uncertainty generates hyperbolic discounting. J. Risk Uncertainty 43(3):169–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature 40(2):351–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galizzi MM, Miraldo M, Stavropoulou C, van der Pol M (2016) Doctor–patient differences in risk and time preferences: A field experiment. J. Health Econom. 50(December):171–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber A, Rohde KIM (2010) Risk and preference reversals in intertemporal choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(3):654–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber A, Rohde KIM (2015) Eliciting discount functions when baseline consumption changes over time. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 116(August):56–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy Y (2015) Time consistency: Stationarity and time invariance. Econometrica 83(1):335–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krantz DH, Duncan Luce R, Suppes P, Tversky A (1971) Additive and Polynomial Representations. Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1992) Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):573–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malkoc SA, Zauberman G (2006) Deferring versus expediting consumption: The effect of outcome concreteness on sensitivity to time horizon. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):618–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier S, Sprenger C (2010) Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(1):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montiel Olea JL, Strzalecki T (2014) Axiomatization and measurement of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1449–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noor J (2011) Intertemporal choice and the magnitude effect. Games Econom. Behav. 72(1):255–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan J, Webb C, Zank H (2015) An extension of quasi-hyperbolic discounting to continuous time. Games Econom. Behav. 89(January):43–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps ES, Pollak RA (1968) On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Rev. Econom. Stud. 35(2):185–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1/2):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (2004) Decreasing impatience: A criterion for non-stationary time preference and “hyperbolic” discounting. Scandinavian J. Econom. 106(3):511–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rohde KIM (2010) The hyperbolic factor: A measure of time inconsistency. J. Risk Uncertainty 41(2):125–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 4(2):155–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Kocher MG, Gltzle-Retzler D, Trautmann ST (2013) Impatience and uncertainty: Experimental decisions predict adolescents’ field behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):510–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger DS, Edwards CS (1994) The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(4):742–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takahashi T (2007) A comparison of intertemporal choices for oneself versus someone else based on Tsallis’ statistics. Physica A 385(2):637–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeuchi K (2011) Non-parametric test of time consistency: Present bias and future bias. Games Econom. Behav. 71(2):456–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Camerer CF, Nguyen Q (2010) Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):557–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Sattath S, Slovic P (1988) Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. 95(3):371–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P (1989) Additive Representations of Preferences, A New Foundation of Decision Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zauberman G, Kyu Kim B, Malkoc SA, Bettman JR (2009) Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. J. Marketing Res. 46(4):543–556.Crossref, Google Scholar