Choice Architecture, Framing, and Cascaded Privacy Choices

References

• Acquisti A, Adjerid I, Brandimarte L (2013) Gone in 15 seconds: The limits of privacy transparency and control. IEEE Security and Privacy (4):72–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, John LK, Loewenstein G (2012) The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):160–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, John LK, Loewenstein G (2013) What is privacy worth? J. Legal Stud. 42(2):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Peer E, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the privacy paradox: Objective versus relative risk in privacy decision making. Management Inform. Systems Quart. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id2765097.Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Telang R, Padman R, Adler-Milstein J (2015) The impact of privacy regulation and technology incentives: The case of health information exchanges. Management Sci. 62(4):1042–1063.Link, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almuhimedi H, Schaub F, Sadeh N, Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Gluck J, …Agarwal Y (2015) Your location has been shared 5,398 times!: A field study on mobile app privacy nudging. Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM), 787–796.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balebako R, Leon P, Shay R, Ur B, Wang Y, Cranor L (2012) Measuring the effectiveness of privacy tools for limiting behavioral advertising. Workshop on Web 2.0 Security and Privacy (W2SP 2012, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2013) Misplaced confidences privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):340–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burnham T, McCabe K, Smith VL (2000) Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 43(1):57–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chavez P (2011) Re: Preliminary FTC staff report on “Protecting consumer privacy in an era of rapid change: A proposed framework for businesses and policymakers.” Google.Google Scholar
• Crandall RW, Graham JD (1984) Automobile safety regulation and offsetting behavior: Some new empirical estimates. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):328–331.Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. 10(1):104–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Dave D, Kaestner R (2009) Health insurance and ex ante moral hazard: Evidence from Medicare. Internat. J. Health Care Finance Econom. 9(4):367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):61–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Egelman S, Felt AP, Wagner D (2013) Choice architecture and smartphone privacy: There’s a price for that. Böhme R, eds. The Economics of Information Security and Privacy (Springer, Berlin), 211–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Caruso E, Bazerman MH (2006) When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(5):872–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (2012) Protecting consumer privacy in an era of rapid change: Recommendations for businesses and policymakers. Report, http://www.ftc.gov/os/2012/03/120326privacyreport.pdf.Google Scholar
• Fischer-Hübner S (2001) IT-Security and Privacy: Design and Use of Privacy-Enhancing Security Mechanisms (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganzach Y, Karsahi N (1995) Message framing and buying behavior: A field experiment. J. Bus. Res. 32(1):11–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB (2013) Editor’s comments: Information systems research and behavioral economics. MIS Quart. 37(3):3–8.Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Goodman JK, Cryder CE, Cheema A (2013) Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. J. Behavioral Decision Making 26(3):213–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossklags J, Acquisti A (2007) When 25 cents is too much: An experiment on willingness-to-sell and willingness-to-protect personal information. Workshop on the Economics of Information Systems (WEIS 2017, Pittsburgh, PA).Google Scholar
• Hui K-L, Teo HH, Lee SYT (2007) The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quart. 31(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen C, Potts C, Jensen C (2005) Privacy practices of Internet users: Self-reports versus observed behavior. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 63(1):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Goldstein D (2003) Do defaults save lives? Science 302(5649):1338–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Bellman S, Lohse GL (2002) Defaults, framing and privacy: Why opting in-opting out. Marketing Lett. 13(1):5–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Häubl G, Keinan A (2007) Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 33(3):461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Shu SB, Dellaert BG, Fox C, Goldstein DG, Häubl G, Weber EU (2012) Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Lett. 23(2):487–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica J. Econometric Soc. 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller PA, Harlam B, Loewenstein G, Volpp KG (2011) Enhanced active choice: A new method to motivate behavior change. J. Consumer Psych. 21(4):376–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly IR, Markowitz S (2009) Incentives in obesity and health insurance. Inquiry 46(4):418–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim DJ, Ferrin DL, Rao HR (2008) A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems 44(2):544–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klick J, Stratmann T (2007) Diabetes treatments and moral hazard. J. Law Econom. 50(3):519–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klopfer PH, Rubenstein DI (1977) The concept privacy and its biological basis. J. Soc. Issues 33(3):52–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kühberger A (1998) The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 75(1):23–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin IP, Gaeth GJ (1988) How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. J. Consumer Res. 15(3):374–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ (1998) All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(2):149–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Miller T (1999) Review: Risk compensation literature, the theory and evidence. J. Crash Prevention Injury Control 2(1):75–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman V, Samuels SM, Ross L (2004) The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(9):1175–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Bryce C, Hagmann D, Rajpal S (2015) Warning: You are about to be nudged. Behavioral Sci. Policy 1(1):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohr S (2013) Big data is opening doors, but maybe too many. New York Times (March 3), http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/24/technology/big-data-and-a-renewed-debate-over-privacy.html.Google Scholar
• Milne GR, Gordon EM (1993) Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. J. Public Policy Marketing 12(2):206–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miyazaki AD, Krishnamurthy S (2002) Internet seals of approval: Effects on online privacy policies and consumer perceptions. J. Consumer Affairs 36(1):28–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon Y (2000) Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. J. Consumer Res. 26(4):323–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N (2009) Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):867–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peltzman S (1975) The effects of automobile safety regulation. J. Political Econom. 83(4):677–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pew Center on the States (2012) Overdraft America: Confusion and concerns about bank practices. Accessed July 26, 2018, http://www.pewtrusts.org/∼/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/pcs_assets/2012/sciboverdraft20america1pdf.pdf.Google Scholar
• Richter M (2011) Re: Preliminary FTC staff report on “Protecting consumer privacy in an era of rapid change: A proposed framework for businesses and policymakers.” Accessed July 26, 2018, https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_comments/preliminary-ftc-staff-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change-proposed-framework/00413-58069.pdf.Google Scholar
• Schneider SL (1992) Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, current theories of risky choice. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 18(5):1040–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoorman FD, Mayer RC, Douglas CA, Hetrick CT (1994) Escalation of commitment and the framing effect: An empirical investigation. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 24(6):509–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz PM (2005) Privacy inalienability and the regulation of spyware. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 20(3):1269–1282.Google Scholar
• Shafir E (1993) Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory Cognition 21(4):546–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solove DJ (2013) Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Rev. 126(7):1879–2139.Google Scholar
• Steelman ZR, Hammer BI, Limayem M (2014) Data collection in the digital age: Innovative alternatives to student samples. MIS Quart. 38(2):355–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stutzman F, Gross R, Acquisti A (2013) Silent listeners: The evolution of privacy and disclosure on Facebook. J. Privacy Confidentiality 4(2):7–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeney L (2013) Discrimination in online ad delivery. Queue 11(3):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takemura K (1994) Influence of elaboration on the framing of decision. J. Psych. 128(1):33–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR, Balz JP (2014) Choice architecture. The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 428–439.Google Scholar
• Turow J, Hennessy M (2007) Internet privacy and institutional trust insights from a national survey. New Media Soc. 9(2):300–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilde GJ (1982) The theory of risk homeostasis: Implications for safety and health. Risk Analysis 2(4):209–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum (2013) Unlocking the value of personal data: From collection to usage. Report, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_IT_UnlockingValuePersonalData_CollectionUsage_Report_2013.pdf.Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BC, Agarwal R (2009) The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):135–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BC, Agarwal R (2012) Research note. Effects of individual self-protection, industry self-regulation, and government regulation on privacy concerns: A study of location-based services. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1342–1363.Link, Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Liang KY (1986) Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 42(1):121–130.Crossref, Google Scholar