Sunk Cost as a Self-Management Device

References

• Arkes HR, Blumer C (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 35(1):124–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baliga S, Ely J (2011) Mnemonomics: The sunk cost fallacy as a memory kludge. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 3(4):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R (2013) Groupthink: Collective delusions in organizations and markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(2):429–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2002) Self-confidence and personal motivation. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):871–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2004) Willpower and personal rules. J. Political Econom. 122(4):848–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2016) Mindful economics: The production, consumption, and value of beliefs. J. Econom. Perspect. 30(3):141–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrillo J, Mariotti T (2000) Strategic ignorance as a self-disciplining device. Rev. Econom. Stud. 67(3):529–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew S, Huang W, Zhao X (2018) Motivated false memory. Mimeo.Google Scholar
• Cho I, Kreps D (1987) Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quart. J. Econom. 102(2):179–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dessi R, Zhao X (2018) Overconfidence, stability and investments. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 145(January):474–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doody R (2013) The sunk cost “fallacy” is not a fallacy. Mimeo, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Ericson K (2017) On the interaction of memory and procrastination: Implications for reminders, deadlines, and empirical estimation. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(3):692–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eyster E (2002) Rationalizing the past: A taste for consistency. Mimeo, Nuffield College, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folkes VS (1998) Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions. J. Consumer Res. 14(4):548–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D (2006) Advancing beyond Advances in Behavioral Economics. J. Econom. Literature 44(3):694–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gottlieb D (2014) Imperfect memory and choice under risk. Games Econom. Behav. 85(May):127–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L (2016) Contextual deliberation and preference construction. Management Sci. 62(10):2977–2993.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Zhang J (2012) Consumer deliberation and product line design. Marketing Sci. 31(6):995–1007.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Png IPL, Reza S (2018) Sunk cost fallacy in driving the world’s costliest cars. Management Sci. 64(4):1761–1778.Link, Google Scholar
• Jain S (2012) Self-control and incentives: An analysis of multiperiod quota plans. Marketing Sci. 31(5):855–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Just DR, Wansink B (2011) The flat-rate pricing paradox: Conflicting effects of “all-you-can-eat” buffet pricing. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(1):193–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanodia C, Bushman R, Dickhaut J (1989) Escalation errors and the sunk cost effect: An explanation based on reputation and information asymmetries. J. Accounting Res. 27(1):59–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Villas-Boas M (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Kwak J, Park J (2011) Effects of a regulatory match in sunk-cost effects: A mediating role of anticipated regret. Marketing Lett. 23(1):209–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mailath GJ (1987) Incentive compatibility in signaling games with a continuum of types. Econometrica 55(6):1349–1365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mailath GJ (1992) Signalling games. Creedy J, Borland J, Eichberger J, eds. Recent Development in Game Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing, Hants, UK), 65–93.Google Scholar
• Mailath GJ, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Postlewaite A (1993) Belief-based refinements in signalling games. J. Econom. Theory 60(2):241–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston M, Green J (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Matthews C (2014) Fortune 5: The biggest organized crime groups in the world. Fortune (September 14), http://fortune.com/2014/09/14/biggest-organized-crime-groups-in-the-world/.Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, Mialon HM, Mialon SH (2010) Do sunk costs matter? Econom. Inquiry 48(2):323–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nozick R (1993) The Nature of Rationality (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers T, Milkman KL, Volpp KG (2014) Commitment devices: Using initiatives to change behavior. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 311(20):2065–2066.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruffle B, Wilson A (2017) Tat will tell: Tattoos and time preferences. Mimeo, Wilfred Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
• Sela A, Berger J (2012) How attribute quantity influences option choice. J. Marketing Res. 49(6):942–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soman D, Cheema A (2001) The effect of windfall gains on the sunk-cost effect. Marketing Lett. 12(1):51–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strotz R (1955) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23(3):165–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1(1):39–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yang B (2010) The sunk-cost effect and optimal two-part pricing. J. Econom. 101(2):133–148.Google Scholar