Extracting the Wisdom of Crowds When Information Is Shared

References

• Armstrong SJ (2001) Combining forecasts. Armstrong SJ, ed. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA), 417–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron J, Mellers BA, Tetlock PE, Stone E, Ungar LH (2014) Two reasons to make aggregated probability forecasts more extreme. Decision Anal. 11(2):133–145.Link, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Chen E (2015) Identifying expertise to extract the wisdom of crowds. Management Sci. 61(2):267–280.Link, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Yu HT (2007) Aggregation of opinions based on correlated cues and advisors. J. Behavioral Decision Making 20(2):153–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen K, Fine LR, Huberman BA (2004) Eliminating public knowledge biases in information-aggregation mechanisms. Management Sci. 50(7):983–994.Link, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT (1989) Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. Internat. J. Forecasting 5(4):559–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Winkler RL (1985) Limits for the precision and value of information from dependent sources. Oper. Res. 33(2):427–442.Link, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Winkler RL (1986) Combining economic forecasts. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 4(1):39–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frongillo RM, Chen Y, Kash IA (2015) Elicitation for aggregation. Bonet B, Koenig S, eds. Proc. Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 900–906.Google Scholar
• Galton F (1907) Vox populi. Nature 1949(75):450–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigone D, Hastie R (1993) The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(5):959–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jose VRR, Winkler RL (2008) Simple robust averages of forecasts: Some empirical results. Internat. J. Forecasting 24:163–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jurca R, Faltings B (2009) Mechanisms for making crowds truthful. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 34(1):209–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim O, Lim SC, Shaw KW (2001) The inefficiency of the mean analyst forecast as summary of forecast of earnings. J. Accounting Res. 39:329–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrick RP, Soll JB (2006) Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Sci. 52(1):111–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Larrick RP, Mannes AE, Soll JB (2012) The social psychology of the wisdom of crowds. Krueger JI, ed. Social Psychology and Decision Making (Psychology Press, New York), 227–242.Google Scholar
• Lichtendahl KC, Grushka-Cockayne Y, Pfeifer PE (2013) The wisdom of competitive crowds. Oper. Res. 61(6):1383–1398.Link, Google Scholar
• Makridakis S, Winkler RL (1983) Averages of forecasts: Some empirical results. Management Sci. 29(9):987–996.Link, Google Scholar
• Mannes AE, Soll JB, Larrick RP (2014) The wisdom of select crowds. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(2):276–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCoy J, Prelec D (2017) A statistical model for aggregating judgments by incorporating peer predictions. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Miller N, Resnick P, Zeckhauser R (2005) Eliciting informative feedback: The peer-prediction method. Management Sci. 51(9):1359–1373.Link, Google Scholar
• Ottaviani M, Sørensen PN (2006) The strategy of professional forecasting. J. Financial Econom. 81:441–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page SE (2008) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (2004) A Bayesian truth serum for subjective data. Science 306:462–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D, Seung HS (2006) An algorithm that finds truth even if most people are wrong.Google Scholar
• Prelec D, Seung HS, McCoy J (2017) A solution to the single-question crowd wisdom problem. Nature 541:532–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soll JB (1999) Intuitive theories of information: Beliefs about the value of redundancy. Cognitive Psych. 38(2):317–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soll JB, Larrick RP (2009) Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 35(3):780–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J (2005) The Wisdom of Crowds (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Winkler RL (1981) Combining probability distributions from dependent information sources. Management Sci. 27(4):479–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Witkowski J, Bachrach Y, Key P, Parkes DC (2013) Dwelling on the negative: Incentivizing effort in peer prediction. First AAAI Conf. Human Comput. Crowdsourcing.Google Scholar
• Yaniv I, Choshen-Hillel S, Milyavsky M (2009) Spurious consensus and opinion revision: Why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments? J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 35(2):558–563.Crossref, Google Scholar