“Hello Jumbo!” The Spatio-Temporal Rollout and Traffic to a New Grocery Chain After Acquisition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3054

References

  • Accenture (2009) Putting customers at the heart of the retail merger. Accessed October 24, 2018, http://www.criticaleye.com/inspiring/insights-detail.cfm?id=1443.Google Scholar
  • Ailawadi KL, Pauwels K, Steenkamp J-BEM (2008) Private-label use and store loyalty. J. Marketing 72(6):19–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison PD (1984) Event History Analysis (SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avery J, Steenburgh TJ, Deighton J, Caravella M (2012) Adding bricks to clicks: Predicting the patterns of cross-channel elasticities over time. J. Marketing 76(3):96–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DR, Ho T-H, Tang CS (1998) Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):352–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Sorensen AT, Rasmussen SJ (2010) Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Sci. 29(5):815–827.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Briesch RA, Chintagunta PK, Fox EJ (2009) How does assortment affect grocery store choice? J. Marketing Res. 46(2):176–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briesch RA, Dillon WR, Fox EJ (2013) Category positioning and store choice: The role of destination categories. Marketing Sci. 32(3):488–509.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Mela CF (2004) Market roll-out and retailer adoption for new brands. Marketing Sci. 23(4):500–518.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Che H, Chen X, Chen Y (2012) Investigating effects of out-of-stock on consumer stockkeeping unit choice. J. Marketing Res. 49(4):502–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Che H, Erdem T, Öncü TS (2015) Consumer learning and evolution of consumer brand preferences. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(3):173–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A (2010) Consumer learning and heterogeneity: Dynamics of demand for prescription drugs after patent expiration. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(6):619–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A, Ishihara M (2010) The effects of detailing on prescribing decisions under quality uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(2):123–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A, Erdem T, Keane MP (2017) Empirical models of learning dynamics: A survey of recent developments. Wierenga B, Van Der Lans R, eds. Handbook of Marketing Decision Models (Springer, Amsterdam), 223–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cording M, Christmann P, King DR (2008) Reducing causal ambiguity in acquisition integration: Intermediate goals as mediators of integration decisions and acquisition performance. Acad. Management J. 51(4):744–767.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford GS, Shum M (2005) Uncertainty and learning in pharmaceutical demand. Econometrica 73(4):1137–1173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Financiële Telegraaf (2009) Ambitieus Jumbo wordt fors groter [Ambitious Jumbo becomes much larger]. (October 19).Google Scholar
  • DeGroot MH (1970) Optimal Statistical Decisions (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Distrifood (2009a) Omzet Super de Boer op peil [Super de Boer revenues on par]. (March 31).Google Scholar
  • Distrifood (2009b) “Casino wil van SdB af” [“Casino wants to divest SdB”]. (April 2).Google Scholar
  • Distrifood (2009c) 40 SdB’s in 2010 om naar Jumbo [40 SdB’s to Jumbo in 2010]. (December 19).Google Scholar
  • Distrifood (2010a) Extra team voor ombouw SdB [Extra team for conversion of SdB]. (October 23).Google Scholar
  • Distrifood (2010b) SdB baalt van slechte vulgraad [SdB fed up with low in-stock rate]. (December 4).Google Scholar
  • Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • EFMI (2009) De overname van Super de Boer: Een EFMI-analyse vanuit Shopperperspectief [The acquisition of Super de Boer: An EFMI-analysis from a shopper’s perspective]. Working paper, EFMI Business School, Leusden, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • EFMI (2011) De ombouw van Super de Boer: Fase 2 van Jumbo’s vlucht [The conversion of Super de Boer: Phase 2 of Jumbo’s flight]. Working paper, EFMI Business School, Leusden, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Ellickson PB, Houghton S, Timmins C (2013) Estimating network economies in retail chains: A revealed preference approach. RAND J. Econom. 44(2):169–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T, Keane MP, Öncü TS, Strebel J (2005) Learning about computers: An analysis of information search and technology choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(3):207–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foodmagazine (2009) Prijsimago AH nog nooit zo goed [Price image AH was never this good]. (December).Google Scholar
  • FoodPersonality (2011a) Ombouwen: De laatste 15 tot 25% zijn het moeilijkst [Conversions: The last 15 to 25% are the most difficult ones]. (February).Google Scholar
  • FoodPersonality (2011b) Ombouw Jumbo and C1000. Eerst filialen, dan ondernemers, of beter andersom? [Conversion to Jumbo and C1000. First company-owned stores, then franchisees, or vice versa?]. (March)Google Scholar
  • Gielens K, Dekimpe MG (2001) Do international entry decisions of retail chains matter in the long run? Internat. J. Res. Marketing 18(3):235–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gielens K, Dekimpe MG (2007) The entry strategy of retail firms into transition economies. J. Marketing 71(2):196–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gijsbrechts E, Campo K, Nisol P (2008) Beyond promotion-based store switching: Antecedents and patterns of systematic multiple-store shopping. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 25(1):5–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton R, Chernev A (2013) Low prices are just the beginning: Price image in retail management. J. Marketing 77(6):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanssens DM, Parsons LJ, Schultz RL (2001) Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Holmes TJ (2011) The diffusion of Wal-Mart and economies of density. Econometrica 79(1):253–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homburg C, Bucerius M (2005) A marketing perspective on mergers and acquisitions: How marketing integration affects postmerger performance. J. Marketing 69(1):95–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homburg C, Bucerius M (2006) Is speed of integration really a success factor of mergers and acquisitions? An analysis of the role of internal and external relatedness. Strategic Management J. 27(4):347–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jia P (2008) What happens when Wal-Mart comes to town: An empirical analysis of the discount retailing industry. Econometrica 76(6):1263–1316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalish S, Mahajan V, Muller E (1995) Waterfall and sprinkler new-product strategies in competitive global markets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 12(2):105–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lam SY, Vandenbosch M, Hulland J, Pearce M (2001) Evaluating promotions in shopping environments: Decomposing sales response into attraction, conversion, and spending effects. Marketing Sci. 20(2):194–215.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee JY, Bell DR (2013) Neighborhood social capital and social learning for experience attributes of products. Marketing Sci. 32(6):960–976.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levensmiddelenkrant (2010) SdB-assortiment vertoont scheurtjes [SdB-assortment shows stock-outs]. (July 17).Google Scholar
  • Lin S, Zhang J, Hauser JR (2015) Learning from experience, simply. Marketing Sci. 34(1):1–19.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Logistiek (2009) Logistieke ommezwaai voor Jumbo [Shift in logistics for Jumbo]. (October 19).Google Scholar
  • Lourenço CJ, Gijsbrechts E, Paap R (2015) The impact of category prices on store price image formation: An empirical analysis. J. Marketing Res. 52(2):200–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mägi AW, Julander C-R (2005) Consumers’ store-level price knowledge: Why are some consumers more knowledgeable than others? J. Retailing 81(4):319–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinsey (2010) The next wave of M&A in US retail. Accessed October 24, 2018, http://www.mckinsey.com/∼/media/McKinsey/dotcom/client_service/retail/articles/the next wave of ma in us retail.ashx.Google Scholar
  • Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2003) Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. 22(1):58–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2004) Role of forgetting in memory-based choice decisions: A structural model. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(2):107–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meng CK, Schmidt P (1985) On the cost of partial observability in the bivariate probit model. Internat. Econom. Rev. 26(1):71–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitra D, Golder PN (2002) Whose culture matters? Near-market knowledge and its impact on foreign market entry timing. J. Marketing Res. 39(3):350–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Manchanda P (2009) Heterogeneous learning and the targeting of marketing communication for new products. Marketing Sci. 28(3):424–441.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • NOS (2010) Jumbo start ombouwen Super de Boer [Jumbo starts the conversion of Super de Boer]. (February 8), http://nos.nl/artikel/135089-jumbo-start-ombouwen-super-de-boer.html.Google Scholar
  • Osborne M (2011) Consumer learning, switching costs, and heterogeneity: A structural examination. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(1):25–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Planet Retail (2009a) Jumbo wins battle for Super de Boer. (October 19), http://www.planetretail.net/News/Article/0/54189.Google Scholar
  • Planet Retail (2009b) Jumbo gets the green light to purchase Super de Boer. (December 8), http://www.planetretail.net/News/Article/0/55353.Google Scholar
  • Planet Retail (2011) Planet Retail’s 2010 mergers and acquisitions ranking. (September 19), http://www.planetretail.net/News/Article/0/71932.Google Scholar
  • Planet Retail (2012) Aldi Nord lists Coca-Cola in the Netherlands. (December 4), http://www.planetretail.net/News/Article/0/81205.Google Scholar
  • Reilly AH, Brett JM, Stroh LK (1993) The impact of corporate turbulence on managers’ attitudes. Strategic Management J. 14(S1):167–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Retail Week (2012) Co-op sales dragged down by former Somerfield stores. (February 28).Google Scholar
  • Rhee H, Bell DR (2002) The inter-store mobility of supermarket shoppers. J. Retailing 78(4):225–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts JH, Urban GL (1988) Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. 34(2):167–185.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seim K (2006) An empirical model of firm entry with endogenous product-type choices. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):619–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin S, Misra S, Horsky D (2012) Disentangling preferences and learning in brand choice models. Marketing Sci. 31(1):115–137.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sirohi N, McLaughlin EW, Wittink DR (1998) A model of consumer perceptions and store loyalty intentions for a supermarket retailer. J. Retailing 74(2):223–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sriram S, Chintagunta PK (2010) Learning models. Rev. Marketing Res. 6:63–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steenkamp J-BEM, Kumar N (2009) Don’t be undersold! Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(12):90–95.Google Scholar
  • Super de Boer (2009) 2009 annual report. Accessed October 24, 2018, http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/LAURUS/0x0x359176/ff315220-61bf-4498-9e1e-71c5553e3e72/SdB_jvs_2009_report_online.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Szymanowski M, Gijsbrechts E (2013) Patterns in consumption-based learning about brand quality for consumer packaged goods. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 30(3):219–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomadsen R (2007) Product positioning and competition: The role of location in the fast food industry. Marketing Sci. 26(6):792–804.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Toivanen O, Waterson M (2005) Market structure and entry: Where’s the beef? RAND J. Econom. 36(3):680–699.Google Scholar
  • Van Heerde HJ, Gijsbrechts E, Pauwels K (2008) Winners and losers in a major price war. J. Marketing Res. 45(5):499–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Heerde HJ, Gijsbrechts E, Pauwels K (2015) Fanning the flames? How media coverage of a price war affects retailers, consumers, and investors. J. Marketing Res. 52(5):674–693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vroegrijk M, Gijsbrechts E, Campo K (2013) Close encounter with the hard discounter: A multiple-store shopping perspective on the impact of local hard-discounter entry. J. Marketing Res. 50(5):606–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vroegrijk M, Gijsbrechts E, Campo K (2016) Battling for the household’s category buck: Can economy private labels defend supermarkets against the hard-discounter threat? J. Retailing 92(3):300–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warlop L, Ratneshwar S, Van Osselaer SMJ (2005) Distinctive brand cues and memory for product consumption experiences. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 22(1):27–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West M, Harrison J (1999) Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Willard Bishop (2010) Refresh or remodel: How to stay relevant in tough times. Accessed May 11, 2017.Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2015) Control function methods in applied econometrics. J. Human Resoures 50(2):420–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Q, Gangwar M, Seetharaman PB (2017) Polygamous store loyalties: An empirical investigation. J. Retailing. 93(4):477–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Helsen K (2011) Consumer learning in a turbulent market environment: Modeling consumer choice dynamics after a product-harm crisis. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):255–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao Y, Yang S, Narayan V, Zhao Y (2013) Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews. Marketing Sci. 32(1):153–169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu T, Singh V (2009) Spatial competition with endogenous location choices: An application to discount retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(1):1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu T, Singh V, Manuszak MD (2009) Market structure and competition in the retail discount industry. J. Marketing Res. 46(4):453–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.