Institutional Investors and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies: Evidence from Toxics Release Data

References

• Aggarwal R, Erel I, Ferreira M, Matos P (2011) Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. J. Financial Econom. 100:154–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Williams CA, Conley JM, Rupp DE (2006) Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance Internat. Rev. 14(3):147–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Allen R, Letourneau H, Hebb T (2012) Shareholder engagement in the extractive sector. J. Sustainable Finance Investment 2(1):3–25.Google Scholar
• Almeida H, Campello M, Weisbach MS (2004) The cash flow sensitivity of cash. J. Finance 59(4):1777–1804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amore MD, Bennedsen M (2016) Corporate governance and green innovation. J. Environ. Econom. Management 75:54–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora S, Cason T (1995) An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: Participation in EPA’s 33/50 program. J. Environ. Econom. Management 28:271–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayers B, Ramalingegowda S, Yeung PE (2011) Hometown advantage: The effects of monitoring institution location on financial reporting discretion. J. Accounting Econom. 52(1):41–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnea A, Rubin A (2010) Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. J. Bus. Ethics 97:71–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer R, Clark GL, Viehs M (2013) The geography of shareholder engagement: Evidence from a large British asset manager. ECCE working paper, Maastricht University and Oxford University.Google Scholar
• Bear S, Rahman N, Post C (2010) The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 97(2):207–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:783–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becht M, Franks J, Mayer C, Rossi S (2010) Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK focus fund. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(3):3093–3129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beder S (2013) Environmental Principles and Policies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction (Routledge).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bialkowski J, Starks LT (2016) SRI funds: Investor demand, exogenous shocks and ESG profiles. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Borgers A, Derwall J, Koedijk K, Ter Horst J (2015) Do social factors influence investment behavior and performance? Evidence from mutual fund holdings. J. Banking Finance 60:112–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bratton W, Wachter M (2010) The case against shareholder empowerment. University Pennsylvania Law Rev. 158:653–728.Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Partnoy F, Thomas R (2008) Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. J. Finance 63(4):1729–1775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown WO, Helland E, Smith JK (2006) Corporate philanthropic practices. J. Corporate Finance 12(5):855–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier MK, Nagel S (2004) Hedge funds and the technology bubble. J. Finance 59(5):2013–2040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan B, Netter J, Poulsen A, Yang T (2012) Shareholder proposal rules and practice: Evidence from a comparison of the United States and United Kingdom. Amer. Bus. Law J. 49:739–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bui LT, Mayer CJ (2003) Regulation and capitalization of environmental amenities: Evidence from the toxic release inventory in Massachusetts. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(3):693–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee B (2001) Do institutional investors prefer near term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Res. 18:207–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carleton W, Nelson J, Weisbach M (1998) The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF. J. Finance 53:1335–1362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chava S (2014) Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Sci. 60:2223–2247.Link, Google Scholar
• Chhaochharia V, Kumar A, Niessen-Ruenzi A (2012) Local investors and corporate governance. J. Accounting Econom. 54:42–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chidambaran NK, Woidtke T (1999) The role of negotiations in corporate governance: Evidence from withdrawn shareholder-initiated proposals. Working paper, Tulane University and Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J. Law Econom. 3:1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW, Coff DC, Eastvold R (2006) The knowledge-leveraging paradox: How to achieve scale without making knowledge imitable. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):452–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval J, Moskowitz T (1999) Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J. Finance 54:2045–2073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darabaris J (2007) Corporate Environmental Management (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Guercio D, Hawkins J (1999) The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. J. Financial Econom. 52(3):293–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Toffel M (2012) Institutional pressures and organizational characteristics: Implications for environmental strategy. Bansal, Pratima, Hoffman A, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Deng X, Kang JK, Low BS (2013) Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. J. Financial Econom. 110:87–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derezinski DD, Lacy MG, Stretesky PB (2003) Chemical accidents in the United States, 1990–1996. Soc. Sci. Quart. 84(1):122–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Giuli A, Kostovetsky L (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 111:158–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimson E, Karakaş O, Li X (2015) Active ownership. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(12):3225–3268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dooley R, Lerner L (1994) Pollution, profits, and stakeholders: The constraining effect of economic performance on CEO concern with stakeholder expectations. J. Bus. Ethics 13:701–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doshi AR, Dowell GWS, Toffel MW (2013) How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1209–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowell G, Hart S, Yeung B (2000) Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Sci. 46(8):1059–1074.Link, Google Scholar
• Dyck IJA, Lins KV, Roth HF, Wagner HF (2015) Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Working paper.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earnhart D (2004) The effects of community characteristics on polluter compliance levels. Land Econom. 80(3):408–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Sci. 60(11):2835–2857.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmans A (2011) Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. J. Financial Econom. 101:621–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Ghoul S, Guedhami O, Kwok C, Mishra D (2011) Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? J. Banking Finance 35:2388–2406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrell A, Liang H, Renneboog L (2016) Socially responsible firms. J. Financial Econom. 122(3):585–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finke R, Scheitle CP (2005) Accounting for the uncounted: Computing correctives for the 2000 RCMS data. Rev. Religious Res. 5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management J. 36:1469–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freudenberg N, Steinsapir C (1991) Not in our backyards: The grassroots environmental movement. Soc. Natl. Resources 4(3):235–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillan S, Starks LT (2007) The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 19(1):55–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillan S, Hartzell JC, Koch A, Starks LT (2010) Firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) choices, performance and managerial motivation. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Giroud X (2013) Proximity and investment: Evidence from plant-level data. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):861–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman J, Louche C, Van Cranenburgh KC, Arenas D (2014) Social shareholder engagement: The dynamics of voice and exit. J. Bus. Ethics 125:193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant D, Jones AW (2003) Are subsidiaries more prone to pollute? New evidence from the EPA’s toxics release inventory. Soc. Sci. Quart. 84(1):162–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant D, Trautner MN, Jones AW (2004) Do facilities with distant headquarters pollute more? How civic engagement conditions the environmental performance of absentee managed plants. Soc. Forces 83(1):189–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant D, Trautner MN, Downey L, Thiebaud L (2010) Bringing the polluters back in environmental inequality and the organization of chemical production. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(4):479–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal J, Serafeim G, Yoon AS (2016) Shareholder activism on sustainability issues. Working paper.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton JT (1993) Politics and social costs: Estimating the impact of collective action on hazardous waste facilities. RAND J. Econom. 24(1):101–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton JT (1995) Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. J. Environ. Econom. Management 28:98–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanna R (2010) US environmental regulation and FDI: Evidence from a panel of US-based multinational firms. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):158–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartzell J, Starks L (2003) Institutional investors and executive compensation. J. Finance 58:2351–2374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasan I, Hoi CKS, Wu Q, Zhang H (2017) Social capital and debt contracting: Evidence from bank loans and public bonds. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 52(3):1017–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He J, Huang J (2016) Product market competition in a world of cross-ownership: Evidence from institutional blockholdings. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(8):2674–2718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson JV, Ono Y (2008) Where do manufacturing firms locate their headquarters? J. Urban Econom. 63(2):431–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kacperczyk M (2009) The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. J. Financial Econom. 93:15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kostovetsky L (2012) Red and blue investing: Values and finance. J. Financial Econom. 103(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kubik J, Scheinkman J (2012) Financial constraints on corporate goodness. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang J (2016) Shareholder coordination, corporate governance, and firm value. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign.Google Scholar
• Husted BW, Jamali D, Saffar W (2015) Near and dear? The role of location in CSR engagement. Strategic Management J. 37:2050–2070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2001) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and corporate objective function. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 14:8–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiao Y (2010) Stakeholder welfare and firm value. J. Banking Finance 34:2549–2561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn M (2002) Demographic change and the demand for environmental regulation. J. Policy Anal. Management 21:45–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kassinis G, Vafeas N (2006) Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Acad. Management J. 49(1):145–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A, Lenox M (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad. Management J. 43:698–716.Google Scholar
• King A, Lenox M (2001) Does it really pay to be green. J. Indust. Ecol. 5:105–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A, Lenox M (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. 48:289–299.Link, Google Scholar
• King BG, Soule SA (2007) Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):413–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitzmueller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. J. Econom. Literature 50:51–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landier A, Nair VB, Wulf J (2009) Trade-offs in staying close: Corporate decision making and geographic dispersion. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(3):1119–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MD, Lounsbury M (2009) Social movement activism and corporate environmental performance: Direct action, community norms and organizational heterogeneity. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
• Levit D (2014) Soft shareholder activism. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Macey GP, Susskind L (2003) Using dispute resolution techniques to address environmental justice concerns: Case studies, prepared by the consensus building institute for the U.S. E.P.A. office of environmental justice. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/case-study-report_adr_in_ej.pdf.Google Scholar
• Maksimovic V, Phillips G (2008) The industry life cycle, acquisitions and investment: Does firm organization matter? J. Finance 63(2):673–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Elfenbein H, Walsh J (2007) Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Maxwell J, Lyon T, Hackett S (2000) Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. J. Law Econom. 43:583–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCahery JA, Sautner Z, Starks LT (2016) Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. J. Finance 71(6):2905–2932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management J. 21:603–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 26:117–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer S (1995) The economic impact of environmental regulation. J. Environ. Law Practice 3:4–15.Google Scholar
• Munnell AH, Chen A (2016) New Developments in Social Investing by Public Pensions (No. ibslp53).Google Scholar
• Natan TE, Miller CG (1998) Are toxic release inventory reductions real? Environ. Sci. Tech. 32(15):368A–374A.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M, Schmidt F, Rynes S (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 24:403–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pagano M, Sinclair G, Yang T (2018) Understanding ESG ratings and ESG indexes. Boubaker S, Cummings D, Nguyen DK, eds. Handbook of Finance and Sustainability (Edward Elgar), 339–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez LD, Soydemir G (2010) Faith-based and sin portfolios. Managerial Finance 36(10):876–885.Google Scholar
• Petersen MA (2004) Information: Hard and soft. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Petrenko OV, Aime F, Ridge J, Hill A (2016) Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 37(2):262–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prechel H, Zheng L (2012) Corporate characteristics, political embeddedness and environmental pollution by large U.S. corporations. Soc. Forces 90(3):947–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renneboog L, Horst J, Zhang C (2008) Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. J. Banking Finance 32:1723–1742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rounds CE Jr (2005) Social investing threatens public pension funds, charitable trusts and the social security trust fund. Entine JH, ed. Pension Fund Politics: The Dangers of Socially Responsible Investing (American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Rynn J (2011) Six reasons manufacturing is central to the economy. Roosevelt Institute. Accessed January 5, 2017, http://rooseveltforward.org/six-reasons-manufacturing-central-economy.Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci. 59:1045–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Sigman H, Stafford SL (2010) Management of hazardous waste and contaminated land. Working paper.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith A (1776) The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Penguin, New York), [1st ed. 1759].Google Scholar
• Stephan M, Kraft ME, Abel TD (2005) Information politics and environmental performance: The impact of the toxics release inventory on corporate decision making. Annual Meetings Amer. Political Sci. Assoc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Lancaster R (2003) Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. 49(4):383–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Beurden P, Gössling T (2008) The worth of values: A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. J. Bus. Ethics 82:407–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Velte P (2016) Women on management board and ESG performance. J. Global Responsibility 7(1):98–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viederman S (2002) Community Organizing and Shareholder Activity (European Policy Forum, London).Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Mao CX (2015) Shareholder activism of public pension funds: The political facet. J. Banking Finance 60:138–152.Crossref, Google Scholar