The Effect of the Say-on-Pay Vote in the United States

References

• Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J. Finance 23(4):189–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong C, Gow ID, Larcker DF (2013) The efficacy of shareholder voting: Evidence from equity compensation plans. J. Accounting Res. 51(5):909–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atanasov VA, Black BS, Ciccotello CS, Gyoshev SB (2010) How does law affect finance? An examination of equity tunneling in Bulgaria. J. Financial Econom. 96(1):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA (2007) Written testimony submitted before the Committee on Financial Services. United States House of Representatives, Hearing on Empowering Shareholders on Executive Compensation, March 8.Google Scholar
• Becker B, Strömberg PJ (2012) Fiduciary duties and equity-debt holder conflicts. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(6):1931–1969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker B, Bergstresser D, Subramanian G (2013) Does shareholder proxy access improve firm value? Evidence from the business roundtable’s challenge. J. Law Econom. 56(1):127–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M (2009) CEOs. Annual Rev. Econom. 1(1):121–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2001) Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. Quart. J. Econom. 116(3):901–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhandari T, Iliev P, Kalodimos J (2017) Public versus private provision of governance: The case of proxy access. SSRN Working Paper 2635695, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Partnoy F, Thomas R (2008) Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm performance. J. Finance 63(4):1729–1775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai J, Walkling RA (2011) Shareholders’ say on pay: Does it create value? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 46(2):299–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai J, Garner JL, Walkling RA (2009) Electing directors. J. Finance 64(5):2389–2420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calonico S, Cattaneo MD, Farrell MH (2017) On the effect of bias estimation on coverage accuracy in nonparametric inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(522):767–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CBA (2009) Summary of executive compensation limits on TARP recipients. CBA Regulatory Compliance Bulletin (February 23), retrieved from https://www.calbankers.com.Google Scholar
• Correa R, Lel U (2016) Say on pay laws, executive compensation, pay slice, and firm valuation around the world. J. Financial Econom. 122(3):431–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cotter J, Alan P, Thomas R (2013) The first year of Say-on-Pay under Dodd–Frank: An empirical analysis and look forward. George Washington Law Rev. 81(3):967–1010.Google Scholar
• Del Guercio D, Seery L, Woidtke T (2008) Do boards pay attention when institutional investor activists “just vote no?” J. Financial Econom. 90(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) Public Law 111–203, July 21, 2010, Section 951.Google Scholar
• Ertimur Y, Ferri F, Muslu V (2011) Shareholder activism and CEO pay. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(2):535–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertimur Y, Ferri F, Oesch D (2012) Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. J. Accounting Res. 51(5):951–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model. J. Financial Econom. 116(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fee E, Hadlock CJ (2004) Management turnover across the corporate hierarchy. J. Accounting Econom. 37(1):3–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferri F, Maber DA (2013) Say on pay votes and CEO compensation: Evidence from the UK. Rev. Finance 17(2):527–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferri F, Oesch D (2016) Management influence on investors: Evidence from shareholder votes on the frequency of say on pay. Contemporary Accounting Res. 33(4):1337–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferri F, Sandino T (2009) The impact of shareholder activism on financial reporting and compensation: The case of employee stock options expensing. Accounting Rev. 84(2):433–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman RJ, Khurana R, Rhodes-Kropf M, Yim S (2013) Governance and CEO turnover: Do something or do the right thing? Management Sci. 60(2):319–337.Link, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Jenter D (2010) CEO compensation. Ann. Rev. Financial Econom. 2(1):75–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstone M, Oyer P, Vissing-Jorgensen A (2006) Mandated disclosure, stock returns, and the 1964 securities act. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):399–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Masulis RW (2015) Board structure and monitoring: New evidence from CEO turnovers. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(10):2770–2811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gustafson M, Iliev P (2017) The effects of removing barriers to equity issuance. J. Financial Econom. 124(3):580–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton J (2011) Investors get say in exec pay. Chicago Daily Herald (January 26), Section News, 1.Google Scholar
• Hay Group (2015) The Wall Street Journal/Hay Group 2014 CEO compensation study finds the recipe for CEO pay is changing, even as growth remains steady at 4.6 percent (June 14), retrieved from http://www.haygroup.com/us/wsj2014.Google Scholar
• Hayes RM, Schaefer S (2009) CEO pay and the Lake Wobegon effect. J. Financial Econom. 94(2):280–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin B (2005) Trends in corporate governance. J. Finance 60(5):2351–2384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin B, Weisbach M (2012) Information disclosure and corporate governance. J. Finance 67(1):195–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmberg S (2013) Can say-on-pay curb executive compensation? Roosevelt Institute Policy Note (September 25), retrieved from http://rooseveltinstitute.org.Google Scholar
• Holzer J (2011a) SEC, in split vote, adopts “say on pay” rule. Wall Street Journal Online (January 25), retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/.Google Scholar
• Holzer J (2011b) Split SEC adopts “say on pay” rule. Wall Street Journal (January 26), C3.Google Scholar
• Holzer J (2011c) A “yes” in say on pay. Wall Street Journal (July 8), B1.Google Scholar
• Iliev P (2010) The effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, earnings quality and stock prices. J. Finance 65(3):1163–1196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens G, Kalyanaraman K (2012) Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(3):933–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN (2007) Testimony of Steven N. Kaplan on “Empowering Shareholders on Executive Compensation” and H.R. 1257, the “Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation Act” before Committee on Financial Services, United States House of Representatives, March 8.Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Minton BA (2012) How has CEO turnover changed? Internat. Rev. Finance 12(1):57–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kronlund M, Sandy S (2016) Does shareholder scrutiny affect executive compensation? Evidence from Say-on-Pay voting. SSRN Working Paper 2358696, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
• Larcker D, McCall AL, Ormazabal G (2015) Outsourcing shareholder voting to proxy advisory firms. J. Law Econom. 58(1):173–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker D, Ormazabal G, Taylor DJ (2011) The market reaction to corporate governance regulation. J. Financial Econom. 101(2):431–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lel U, Miller DP (2008) International cross-listing, firm performance, and top management turnover: A test of the bonding hypothesis. J. Finance 63(4):1897–1937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lel U, Miller DP (2017) The labor market for directors and externalities in corporate governance: Evidence from the international labor market. SSRN Working Paper 2544152, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
• Lynch SN (2011) Small firms not spared in SEC say-on-pay rule. Reuters (January 24), retrieved from https://www.reuters.com.Google Scholar
• MacKinley C (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. J. Econom. Literature 35(1):13–39.Google Scholar
• Marriage M (2016) Executive pay “rubber stamping” rife. Financial Times (May 8), retrieved from https://www.ft.com.Google Scholar
• McCrary J (2008) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. J. Econometrics 142(2):611–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy K (2013) Executive compensation: Where we are, and how we got there. Constantinides G, Harris M, Stulz R, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson J (2013) ISS, Glass Lewis, and the 2013 proxy season. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Georgetown Law Center, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation (February 11), retrieved from https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/.Google Scholar
• Orol R (2011) SEC approves investor say on CEO pay. MarketWatch (January 25), retrieved from https://www.marketwatch.com.Google Scholar
• Perry T, Zenner M (2001) Pay for performance? Government regulation and the structure of compensation contracts. J. Financial Econom. 62(3):453–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters F, Wagner A (2014) The executive turnover risk premium. J. Finance 69(4):1529–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Ziv M, Wermers R (2015) Which shareholders benefit from low-cost monitoring opportunities? Evidence from Say on Pay. SSRN Working Paper 2510442, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
• Song F, Thakor A (2006) Information control, career concerns, and corporate governance. J. Finance 61(4):1845–1896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S (2005) Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. J. Accounting Res. 43(2):291–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein JC (1989) Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 104(4):655–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2015) SEC adopts rule for pay ratio disclosure. SEC Press Release 2015-160 (August 5), retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-160.html.Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2011) Shareholder approval of executive compensation and golden parachute compensation. Final Rule 33–9178, approved January 25, https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2011/33-9178.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2010) Shareholder approval of executive compensation and golden parachute compensation. Proposed Rule 33–9153, approved October 18, https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2010/33-9153.pdf.Google Scholar
• Yermack D (2010) Shareholder voting and corporate governance. Ann. Rev. Financial Econom. 2(1):103–125.Crossref, Google Scholar