A Sharp Test of the Portability of Expertise
Published Online:27 Feb 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3063
References
- (2015) On the generalizability of experimental results in economics. Fréchette GR, Schotter A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economic Methodology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 420–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 15(1):153–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The promise and success of lab-field generalizability in experimental economics: A critical reply to Levitt and List. Working paper, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.Google Scholar
- (2010) On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: New experimental evidence regarding Linda. Games Econom. Behav. 68(2):551–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psych. 4(1):55–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Testing mixed-strategy equilibria when players are heterogeneous: The case of penalty kicks in soccer. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):1138–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition 58(1):1–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Bidding in common value auctions: How the commercial construction industry corrects for the winner’s curse. Management Sci. 42(10):1463–1475.Link, Google Scholar
- (1989) A comparison of naive and experienced bidders in common value offer auctions: A laboratory analysis. Econom. J. 99(394):108–115.Google Scholar
- (2009) Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1953) Essays in Positive Economics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
- (1992) Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change. Cognition 43(2):127–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Bayes rule as a descriptive model: The representativeness heuristic. Quart. J. Econom. 95(3):537–557.Google Scholar
- (1992) Testing Bayes rule and the representativeness heuristic: Some experimental evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 17(1):31–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. J. Finance 60(1):523–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Theory and misbehavior of first price auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(4):749–762.Google Scholar
- (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Naturally occurring markets and exogenous laboratory experiments: A case study of the winner’s curse. Econom. J. 118(528):822–843.Google Scholar
- (2001) When to trust your gut. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(2):59–65.Google Scholar
- (2001) Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behav. Brain Sci. 24(3):383–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):894–920.Google Scholar
- (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
- (2009) Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. Amer. Psychologist 64(6):515–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Don’t take “no” for an answer: An experiment with actual organ donor registrations. NBER Working Paper No. w20378, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Professionals do not play minimax: Evidence from Major League Baseball and the National Football League. NBER Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007a) Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field. Canadian J. Econom./Revue Canadienne économique 40(2):347–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007b) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J. Econom. Perspectives 21(2):153–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Homo economicus evolves. Science 319(5865):909–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) What happens in the field stays in the field: Exploring whether professionals play minimax in laboratory experiments. Econometrica 78(4):1413–1434.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Checkmate: Exploring backward induction among chess players. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):975–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) A simple test of expected utility theory using professional traders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(3):945–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. Experiment. Econom., ePub ahead of print January 29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-018-09597-5.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. Econom. J. 109(453):25–34.Google Scholar
- (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) A further test of noncooperative bargaining theory: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(4):824–836.Google Scholar
- (2003) Professionals play minimax. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(2):395–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Experientia docet: Professionals play minimax in laboratory experiments. Econometrica 76(1):71–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Field centipedes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1619–1635.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psych. Rev. 90(4):293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
