Mobile Messaging for Offline Group Formation in Prosocial Activities: A Large Field Experiment

References

• Andreoni J (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Political Econom. 97(6):1447–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Bernheim BD (2009) Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Rao JM (2011) The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. J. Public Econom. 95(7):513–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews M, Luo X, Fang Z, Ghose A (2016) Mobile ad effectiveness: Hyper-contextual targeting with crowdedness. Marketing Sci. 35(2):218–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S (2016) Networked experiments: A review of methods and innovations. The Oxford Handbook on the Economics of Networks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Aral S, Nicolaides C (2017) Exercise contagion in a global social network. Nature Comm. 8:14753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2012) Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337(6092):337–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.Link, Google Scholar
• Beaman L, Magruder J (2012) Who gets the job referral? Evidence from a social networks experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3574–3593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1991) A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. J. Political Econom. 99(5):1109–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruhin A, Goette L, Roethlisberger A, Markovic A, Buchli R, Frey BM (2015) Call of duty: The effects of phone calls on blood donor motivation. Transfusion 55(11):2645–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2015) The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 61(5):949–962.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2017) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.Link, Google Scholar
• Buyx A (2009) Blood donation, payment, and non-cash incentives: Classical questions drawing renewed interest. Transfusion Medicine Hemotherapy 36(5):329–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calvó-Armengol A, Jackson M (2010) Peer pressure. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 8(1):62–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):431–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Maxwell F, Konstan J, Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on movielens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi J, Bell DR, Lodish LM (2012) Traditional and IS-enabled customer acquisition on the Internet. Management Sci. 58(4):754–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Crumpler H, Grossman P (2008) An experimental test of warm glow giving. J. Public Econom. 92(5):1011–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List J, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dube JP, Luo X, Fang Z (2017) Self-signaling and pro-social behavior: A cause marketing mobile field experiment. Marketing Sci. 36(2):161–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Fang Z, Gu B, Luo X, Xu Y (2015) Contemporaneous and delayed sales impact of location-based mobile promotions. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):552–564.Link, Google Scholar
• Firth D (1993) Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 80(1):27–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong NM, Fang Z, Luo X (2015) Geo-conquesting: Competitive locational targeting of mobile promotions. J. Marketing Res. 52(5):726–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Goldfarb A, Han SP (2013) How is the mobile Internet different? Search costs and local activities. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):613–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Li B, Liu S (2019) Mobile advertising using customer trajectory patterns. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print March 25, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3188.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilchrist DS, Sands EG (2016) Something to talk about: Social spillovers in movie consumption. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1339–1382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn S, Williams A, Nass CC, Bethel J, Kessler D, Scott E, Fridey J, Kleinman S, Schreiber GB (2003) Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: Implications for donor recruitment. Transfusion 43(1):7–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Meier S, Rey-Biel P (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(4):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D, Chen Y, Das S, Dellarocas C, Libai B, Pfeiffer B, Sen S, Shi M (2005) The firm’s management of social interactions. Marketing Lett. 16(3/4):415–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godin G, Vézina-Im LA, Bélanger-Gravel A, Amireault S (2012) Efficacy of interventions promoting blood donation: A systematic review. Transfusion Medicine Rev. 26(3):224–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Lin M, Au Yeung CM (2014) Popularity effect in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Goette L, Stutzer A (2008) Blood donations and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. Working paper, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Goette L, Stutzer A, Frey BM (2010) Prosocial motivation and blood donations: A survey of the empirical literature. Transfusion Medicine Hemotherapy 37(3):149–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicus V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consumer Res. 35:472–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyman J, Ariely D (2004) Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psych. Sci. 15(11):787–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill S, Provost F, Volinsky S (2006) Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statist. Sci. 21(2):256–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iajya V, Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2013) The effects of information, social and financial incentives on voluntary undirected blood donations: Evidence from a field experiment in Argentina. Soc. Sci. Medicine 98:214–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens G, Wooldridge J (2007) What’s new in econometrics? Lecture 11 Discrete Choice Model, NBER Lectures, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Jabr W, Mookerjee R, Tan Y, Mookerjee V (2014) Leveraging philanthropic behavior for customer support: The case of user support forums. MIS Quart. 38(1):187–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, McConnell MA (2014) Hey look at me: The effect of giving circles on giving. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 106:402–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler J, Roth A (2012) Organ allocation policy and the decision to donate. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2018–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Zeng L (2001a) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Anal. 9:137–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Zeng L (2001b) Explaining rare events in international relations. Internat. Organ. 55(3):693–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera BN, Macis M, Slonim R (2012) Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 4(1):186–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2013) Economic rewards to motivate blood donations. Science 340(6135):927–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2014) Rewarding volunteers: A field experiment. Management Sci. 60(5):1107–1129.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Bell DR (2013) Neighborhood social capital and social learning for experience attributes of products. Marketing Sci. 32(6):960–976.Link, Google Scholar
• Li C, Luo X, Cheng Z, Wang X (2016) Sunny, rainy, and cloudy with a chance of mobile promotion effectiveness. Marketing Sci. 36(5):762–779.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Andrews M, Fang Z, Phang CW (2014) Mobile targeting. Management Sci. 60(7):1738–1756.Link, Google Scholar
• Meier S (2007) A survey of economic theories and field evidence on pro-social behavior. Frey BS, Stutzer A, eds. Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 51–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2000) A practitioner’s guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(4):513–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2014) Social networking fact sheet. Accessed December 1, 2017, http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet/.Google Scholar
• Ramanathan S, Vohs K, McGill AL (2013) How do friends and strangers interpret shared experiences? Synchrony as relationship-bolstering or experience-heightening. Botti S, Labroo A, eds. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 41 (Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN).Google Scholar
• Ren R, Chen J, Riedl J (2016). The impact and evolution of group diversity in online open collaboration. Management Sci. 62(6):1668–1686.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun T, Lu SF, Jin GZ (2016) Solving shortage in a priceless market: Insights from blood donation. J. Health Econom. 48:149–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Susarla A, Oh J, Tan Y (2012) Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):23–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Valente TW (2012) Network interventions. Science 337(6090):49–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO) (2015) Blood Safety and Availability, fact sheet #279, updated June 2015. Accessed December 1, 2017, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs279/en/.Google Scholar
• Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–15.Crossref, Google Scholar