Intertemporal Price Discrimination with Complementary Products: E-Books and E-Readers

References

• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica: J. Econom. Soc. 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D, Winston WL (1990) Optimal price skimming by a monopolist facing rational consumers. Management Sci. 36(5):555–567.Link, Google Scholar
• Book Industry Study Group, Inc. (2019) Bookstats. Available at https://www.bookstats.org/.Google Scholar
• Bowker Market Research (2012a) Consumer attitudes toward e-book reading. Available at http://www.bowker.com/retailer-business.Google Scholar
• Bowker Market Research (2012b) U.S. book consumer demographics and buying behaviors annual review. Available at http://www.bowker.com/news/2012.Google Scholar
• Chandukala SR, Kim J, Otter T, Rossi PE, Allenby GM (2008) Choice models in marketing: Economic assumptions, challenges and trends. Foundations Trends (R) Marketing 2(2):97–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Dubé JP (2005) Estimating a stockkeeping-unit-level brand choice model that combines household panel data and store data. J. Marketing Res. 42(3):368–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clements MT, Ohashi H (2005) Indirect network effects and the product cycle: U.S. video games, 1994–2002. J. Indust. Econom. 53(4):515–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Chintagunta P (2010) Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. 29(2):216–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2009) Do switching costs make markets less competitive? J. Marketing Res. 46(4):435–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Seim K, Viard VB (2008) Quantifying the benefits of entry into local phone service. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):699–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandal N, Kende M, Rob R (2000) The dynamics of technological adoption in hardware/software systems: The case of compact disc players. RAND J. Econom. 31(1):43–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M (2007) Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: Online newspapers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):713–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gil R, Hartmann WR (2009) Empirical analysis of metering price discrimination: Evidence from concession sales at movie theaters. Marketing Sci. 28(6):1046–1062.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilbert R (2015) E-books: A tale of digital disruption. J. Econom. Perspect. 29(3):165–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler R, Gordon B (2011) Does AMD spur Intel to innovate more? J. Political Econom. 119(6):1141–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon B (2009) A dynamic model of consumer replacement cycles in the processor industry. Marketing Sci. 28(5):846–867.Link, Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran G, Rysman M (2012) Dynamics of consumer demand for new durable goods. J. Political Econom. 120(6):1173–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Nair HS (2010) Retail competition and the dynamics of demand for tied goods. Marketing Sci. 29(2):366–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2013) Intertemporal price discrimination in storable goods markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2722–2751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu YJ, Smith MD (2013) The impact of e-book distribution on print sales: Analysis of a natural experiment.Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Lancaster T (1994) Combining micro and macro data in microeconometric models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 61(4):655–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1995) Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(4):515–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee R (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu H (2010) Dynamics of pricing in the video game console market: Skimming or penetration? J. Marketing Res. 47(3):428–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melnikov (2013) Demand for differentiated durable products: The case of the U.S. computer printer market. Econom. Inquiry 51(2):1277–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H (2007) Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the U.S. market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(3):239–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H, Chintagunta P, Dubé JP (2004) Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(1):23–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Inc. (2012a) BookScan. Available at https://www.nielsen.com/us/en.html.Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Inc. (2012b) Online shopping trend report. Available at https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/solutions/capabilities/ecommerce.html.Google Scholar
• Oi W (1971) A Disneyland dilemma: Two-part tariffs for a Mickey Mouse monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. 85(1):77–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2013) The rise of e-reading. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/04/04/the-rise-of-e-reading-5/.Google Scholar
• Reimers I, Waldfogel J (2017) Throwing the books at them: Amazon’s puzzling long run pricing strategy. Southern Econom. J. 83(4):869–885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S, Rosenfield A (1997) Ticket pricing. J. Law Econom. 40(2):351–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust J (1987) Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica 55(5):999–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stokey NL (1979) Intertemporal price discrimination. Quart. J. Econom. 93(3):355–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su CL, Judd KL (2012) Constrained optimization approaches to estimation of structural models. Econometrica 80(5):2213–2230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White House (2015) Big data and differential pricing. Available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/docs/Big_Data_Report_Nonembargo_v2.pdf.Google Scholar