The Impact of Time Shifting on TV Consumption and Ad Viewership

References

• Abreu J, Nogueira J, Becker V, Cardoso B (2016) Survey of catch-up TV and other time-shift services: A comprehensive analysis and taxonomy of linear and nonlinear television. Telecomm. Systems 64(1):1–18.Google Scholar
• Acland D, Levy MR (2015) Naiveté, projection bias, and habit formation in gym attendance. Management Sci. 61(1):146–160.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Gans JS (2011) Platform siphoning: Ad-avoidance and media content. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 3(4):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Waldfogel J (2015) Chapter 1—Preference externalities in media markets. Anderson SP, Waldfogel J, Strmberg D, eds. Handbook of Media Economics, Vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 3–40.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Imbens GW (1995) Two-stage least squares estimation of average causal effects in models with variable treatment intensity. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(430):431–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91(434):444–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• BARB (2011) Time-shift viewing. Technical report, Broadcasters Audience Research Board, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Dube J-P, Mela CF (2010) Do digital video recorders influence sales? J. Marketing Res. 47(6):998–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Simester D (2011a) Goodbye Pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Sci. 57(8):1373–1386.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu YJ, Simester D (2011b) Goodbye Pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Sci. 57(8):1373–1386.Link, Google Scholar
• Bulte E, Lensink R, Vu N (2017) Do gender and business trainings affect business outcomes? Experimental evidence from Vietnam. Management Sci. 63(9):2885–2902.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlson M (2006) Tapping into Tivo: Digital video recorders and the transition from schedules to surveillance in television. New Media Soc. 8(1):97–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downey K (2007) Study: First ad does get more eyeballs. Media Life Magazine (August 21).Google Scholar
• Elberse A, Oberholzer-Gee F (2006) Superstars and underdogs: An examination of the long tail phenomenon in video sales. Working paper series, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Ferguson DA, Perse EM (2000) The World Wide Web as a functional alternative to television. J. Broadcasting Electronic Media 44(2):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh B, Stock A (2010) Advertising effectiveness, digital video recorders, and product market competition. Marketing Sci. 29(4):639–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Hollis S, Campbell F (1999) What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 319(7211):670–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• iSuppli Screen Digest (2011) Time-shifted TV audience measurement starts in France (January 7).Google Scholar
• Mochon D, Schwartz J, Maroba J, Patel D, Ariely D (2017) Gain without pain: The extended effects of a behavioral health intervention. Management Sci. 63(1):58–72.Link, Google Scholar
• Pearson S, Barwise P (2007) PVRs and advertising exposure: A video ethnographic study. Internat. J. Internet Marketing Advertising 4(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin AM (2002) The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. Bryant J, Zillmann D, eds. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (Routledge, New York), 525–548.Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008a) How the digital video recorder (DVR) changes traditional television advertising. J. Advertising 37(1):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008b) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. 27(3):356–378.Link, Google Scholar