Technology Conglomeration, Strategic Alliances, and Corporate Innovation

References

• Aghion P, Van Reenen J, Zingales L (2013) Innovation and institutional ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103:277–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen JW, Phillips GM (2000) Corporate equity ownership, strategic alliances, and product market relationships. J. Finance 55:2791–2815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Manso G (2017) Independent boards and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 123:536–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21:267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bena J, Li K (2014) Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. J. Finance 69:1923–1960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman M (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47:676–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81:1347–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J (1999) Market shares, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66:529–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Griffith R, Windmeijer F (2002) Individual effects and dynamics in count data models. J. Econometrics 128:113–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodnaruk A, Massa M, Simonov A (2013) Alliances and corporate governance. J. Financial Econom. 107:671–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone AL, Ivanov VI (2012) Bankruptcy spillover effects on strategic alliance partners. J. Financial Econom. 103:551–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branstetter LG, Sakakibara (2002) When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92:143–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A, Jiang W, Ma S, Tian X (2017) How does hedge fund activism reshape corporate innovation? J. Financial Econom. 130:237–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown G, Mergoupis T (2010) Treatment interactions with non-experimental data in Stata. Bath Economics Research Paper No. 10/10, University of Bath, Bath, UK.Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52:68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan SH, Kensinger JW, Keown AJ, Martin JD (1997) Do strategic alliances create value? J. Financial Econom. 46:199–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur T, Loutskina E, Tian X (2014) Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27:2434–2473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemmanur T, Shen Y, Xie J (2017) Innovation beyond firm boundaries: Common blockholders, strategic alliances, and corporate innovation. Working paper, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4:386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. 99:569–596.Google Scholar
• Fee CE, Hadlock CJ, Thomas S (2006) Corporate equity ownership and the governance of product market relationship. J. Finance 61:1217–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frésard L, Hoberg G, Phillips G (2015) Innovative activities and the incentives for vertical acquisitions and integration. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Fulghieri P, Sevilir M (2009) Organization and financing of innovation, and the choice between corporate and independent venture capital. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 44:1291–1321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Hsu D, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. 33:571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao H, Hsu P-H, Li K (2018) Innovation strategy of private firms. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 53:1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres B, Hagedoorn J, Jaffe AB (2006) Do alliances promote knowledge flows? J. Financial Econom. 80:5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94:691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg MM (2005) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, eds. Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 403–470.Google Scholar
• Hart O (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Management Rev. 20:986–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98:1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He J, Tian X (2018) Finance and corporate innovation: A survey. Asia-Pacific J. Financial Stud. 47:165–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer DA, Hsu P-H, Li D (2014) Don’t hide your light under a bushel: Innovative diversity and stock returns. Working paper, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2010) Product market synergies and competition in mergers and acquisitions: A text-based analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. 23:3773–3811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G, Prabhala N (2014) Product market threats, payouts, and financial flexibility. J. Finance 69:293–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B, Roberts J (1998) The boundaries of the firm revisited. J. Econom. Perspect. 12:73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huddleston J, Sicilian S (2008) History and considerations for combined reporting: Will states adopt a model combined reporting statute? State Local Tax Lawyer Sympos. Edition, 3–20.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76:984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1992) Specific and general knowledge, and organizational structure. Werin L, Wijkander H, eds. Contract Economics (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 251–274.Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45:1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132:665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kortum S, Lerner J (2000) Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. RAND J. Econom. 31:674–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Shane H, Tsai A (2003) Do equity financing cycles matter? Evidence from biotechnology alliances. J. Financial Econom. 67:411–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Sorensen M, Strömberg P (2011) Private equity and long-run investment: The case of innovation. J. Finance 66:445–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G-C, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Yu AZ, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43:941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li K, Prabhala N (2007) Self-selection models in corporate finance. Eckbo BE, ed. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam), 37–86.Google Scholar
• Lindsey L (2008) Blurring firm boundaries: The role of venture capital in strategic alliances. J. Finance 63:1137–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu T, Servilir M, Tian X (2016) Acquiring innovation. Working paper, Wharton School, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66:1823–1869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin JD, Sayrak A (2003) Corporate diversification and shareholder value: A survey of recent literature. J. Corporate Finance 9:37–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazerov M (2009) A majority of states have now adopted a key corporate tax reform—“Combined reporting.” Working paper, Center on Budget and Policy Priority, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers of Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. 44:118–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DJ (2006) Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 27:601–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mody A (1993) Learning through alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 20:151–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17:77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peeters C, van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B (2006) Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms. J. Evolutionary Econom. 16:109–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips GM, Zhdanov A (2013) R&D and the incentives from merger and acquisition activity. Rev. Financial Stud. 26:34–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39:458–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhodes-Kropf M, Robinson DT (2008) The market for mergers and the boundaries of the firm. J. Finance 63:1169–1211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson DT (2008) Strategic alliances and the boundaries of the firm. Rev. Financial Stud. 21:649–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson DT, Stuart TE (2007) Financial contracting in biotech strategic alliances. J. Law Econom. 50:559–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1990) Why do firms do basic research? Res. Policy 19:165–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson RC (2005) Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. 26:1009–1031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seru A (2014) Firm boundaries matter: Evidence from conglomerates and R&D activity. J. Financial Econom. 111:381–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16:522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Solomon SD (2014) New buying strategy as Facebook and Google transform into web conglomerates. New York Times (August 5), https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/08/05/new-strategy-as-tech-giants-transform-into-conglomerates/.Google Scholar
• Stuart TE (1998) Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formulation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43:668–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tian X, Wang T (2014) Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27:211–255.Crossref, Google Scholar