The Effects of Asymmetric Social Ties, Structural Embeddedness, and Tie Strength on Online Content Contribution Behavior

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3087

References

  • Angst CM, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V, Kelley K (2010) Social contagion and information technology diffusion: The adoption of electronic medical records in U.S. hospitals. Management Sci. 56(8):1219–1241.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth tradeoff. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Walker D (2011) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arndt J (1967) Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. J. Marketing Res. 4(3):291–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Austin PC, Small DS (2014) The use of bootstrapping when using propensity‐score matching without replacement: A simulation study. Statist. Medicine 33(24):4306–4319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bateman PJ, Gray PH, Butler BS (2011) The impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):841–854.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JJ, Reingen PH (1987) Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. J Consumer Res. 14(3):350–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Bruyn A, Lilien GL (2008) A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 25(3):151–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke M, Marlow C, Lento T (2009) Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 945–954.Google Scholar
  • Burt R (1992) Structural Holes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R (2000) The network structure of social capital. Res. Organ. Behav. 22:345–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler BS (2001) Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. 12(4):346–362.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen YF, Harper M, Konstan J, Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on MovieLens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiu C-M, Hsu M-H, Wang E (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42(3):1872–1888.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:95–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dehaan E, Hodge F, Shevlin T (2013) Does voluntary adoption of a clawback provision improve financial reporting quality? Contemporary Accounting Res. 30(3):1027–1062.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dholakia UM, Bagozzi RP, Pearo LK (2004) A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 21(3):241–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feld SL (1997) Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations. Soc. Networks 19(1):91–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2008) Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 337:a2338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Han S (2011) An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior on the mobile Internet. Management Sci. 57(9):1671–1691.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D, Silva JC (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goes PB, Lin M, Au Yeung CM (2014) “Popularity effect” in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo S, Fraser MW (2010) Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci Quart. 44:82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargreaves DJ, North AC (1999) The functions of music in everyday life: Redefining the social in music psychology. Psych. Music. 27(1):71–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Q, Nijs VR, Hansen K, Anderson ET (2012) Wal-Mart’s impact on supplier profits. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):131–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes D, Coulson G, Walkerdine J (2005) Free riding on Gnutella revisited: The bell tolls? IEEE Distributed Systems Online 6(6), https://doi.org/10.1109/MDSO.2005.31.Google Scholar
  • Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF (1955) Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lampel J, Bhalla A (2007) The role of status seeking in online communities: Giving the gift of experience. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 12(2):434–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levine DI, Toffel MW (2010) Quality management and job quality: How the ISO 9001 standard for quality management systems affects employees and employers. Management Sci. 56(6):978–996.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ling K, Beenen G, Ludford P, Wang X, Chang K, Li X, Cosley D, et al. (2005) Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. J Comput.-Mediated Comm. 10(4).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma M, Agarwal R (2007) Through a glass darkly: Information technology design identity verification and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 18(1):42–67.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Makela K, Kalla HK, Piekkari R (2007) Interpersonal similarity as a driver of knowledge sharing within multinational corporations. Internat. Bus. Rev. 16(1):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nair HS, Manchanda P, Bhatia T (2010) Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. 47(5):883–895.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • North AC, Hargreaves DJ, O’Neill SA (2000) The importance of music to adolescents. Br. J. Ed. Psych. 70(2):255–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oestreicher-Singer G, Zalmanson L (2013) Content or community? A digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):591–616.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng J, Agarwal A, Hosanagar K, Iyengar R (2014) Toward effective social contagion: A micro level analysis of the impact of dyadic network relationship. Internat. Conf. Information Sys. (ICIS 2014): Building a Better World Through Information Systems (Curan Associates, Red Hook, NY), 4349–4364.Google Scholar
  • Ransbotham S, Kane GC (2011) Online communities: Explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(3):613–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1985) The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics 41(1):103–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR (2002) Design of Observational Studies (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D (2000) Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. 21(3):369–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shalizi CR, Thomas AC (2011) Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 40(2):211–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shi Z, Rui H, Whinston AB (2014) Content sharing in a social broadcasting environment: Evidence from Twitter. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):123–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Susarla A, Oh J, Tan Y (2012) Social networks and diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):23–41.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tafjel, H, Turner, JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
  • Trusov M, Bodapati AV, Bucklin RE (2010) Determining influential users in Internet social networks. J. Marketing Res. 47:643–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai HT, Bagozzi RP (2014) Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):143–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C, Joshi YV (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. 26(3):400–421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL (2001) Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion vs. marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(5):1409–1435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442.Google Scholar
  • Xia M, Huang Y, Duan W, Whinston AB (2012) To continue sharing or not to continue sharing? An empirical analysis of user decision in peer-to-peer sharing networks. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):247–259.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zeng X, Wei L (2013) Social ties and user content generation: Evidence from Flickr. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu F, Zhang XM (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.