Optimal Product Design by Sequential Experiments in High Dimensions

References

• Allenby GM, Ginter JL (1995) Using extremes to design products and segment markets. J. Marketing Res. 32(4):392–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby GM, Rossi PE (1991) There is no aggregation bias: Why macro logit models work. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 9(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan PV, Jacob VS (1996) Genetic algorithms for product design. Management Sci. 42(8):1105–1117.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry ST (1994) Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):242–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brezzi M, Lai TL (2002) Optimal learning and experimentation in bandit problems. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 27(1):87–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cavagnaro DR, Myung JI, Pitt MA, Kujala JV (2010) Adaptive design optimization: A mutual information-based approach to model discrimination in cognitive science. Neural Comput. 22(4):887–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dzyabura D, Hauser JR (2011) Active machine learning for consideration heuristics. Marketing Sci. 30(5):801–819.Link, Google Scholar
• George EI, McCulloch RE (1993) Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88(423):881–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George EI, McCulloch RE (1997) Approaches for Bayesian variable selection. Statist. Sinica 7:339–373.Google Scholar
• Gilbride TJ, Allenby GM, Brazell JD (2006) Models for heterogeneous variable selection. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):420–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang D, Luo L (2016) Consumer preference elicitation of complex products using fuzzy support vector machine active learning. Marketing Sci. 35(3):445–464.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Optim. 13(4):455–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Otter T, Allenby GM (2007) Investigating endogeneity bias in marketing. Marketing Sci. 26(5):642–650.Link, Google Scholar
• Malek KM (2001) Analytical and interpretive practices in design and new product development: Evidence from the automobile industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Mockus J (1994) Application of Bayesian approach to numerical methods of global and stochastic optimization. J. Global Optim. 4(4) 347–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch RE (2005) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauré D, Vielma JP (2017) Ellipsoidal methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. Working paper, University of Chile, Santiago.Google Scholar
• Schonlau M, Welch WJ, Jones DR (1997) A data-analytic approach to Bayesian global optimization. American Statistical Association Proceedings, Section of Physical Engineering Sciences, 186–191.Google Scholar
• Schonlau M, Welch WJ, Jones DR (1998) Global versus local search in constrained optimization of computer models. Flournoy N, Rosenberger WF, Wong WK, eds. New Developments and Applications in Experimental Design (Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA), 11–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz EM, Bradlow E, Fader P (2017) Customer acquisition via display advertising using multi-armed bandit experiments. Marketing Sci. 36(4):500–522.Link, Google Scholar
• Scott SL (2010) A modern Bayesian look at the multi-armed bandit. Appl. Stochast. Models Bus. Indust. 26(6):639–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B 58(1):267–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Hauser JR, Garcia R (2007) Probabilistic polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis: Theory and application. Marketing Sci. 26(5):596–610.Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Houser JR, Simester DL (2004) Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. 41(1):116–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Simester DI, Hauser JR, Dahan E (2003) Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. 22(3):273–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Viappiani P, Boutilier C (2010) Optimal Bayesian recommendation sets and myopically optimal choice query sets. Lafferty JD, Williams CKI, Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel RS, Culotta A, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Proc. Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 2352–2360.Google Scholar
• Wang T, Boutilier C (2003) Incremental utility elicitation with the minimax regret decision criterion. Gottlob G, Walsh T, eds. Proc. 18th Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA), 309–316.Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar