Multiple Goals as Reference Points: One Failure Makes Everything Else Feel Worse

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3097

References

  • Allen EJ, Dechow PM, Pope DG, Wu G (2017) Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon-runners. Management Sci. 63(6):1657–1672.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhatia S (2018) Decision making in environments with non-independent dimensions. J. Behav. Decision Making 31(2):294–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnbaum MH (1972) Morality judgments: Tests of an averaging model. J. Experiment. Psych. 93(1):35–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnbaum MH (1973) Morality judgments: Tests of an averaging model with differential weights. J. Experiment. Psych. 99(3):395–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnbaum MH (1974) The nonadditivity of personality impressions. (Monograph.) J. Experiment. Psych. 102(3):543–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnbaum MH (2008) New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psych. Rev. 115(2):463–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnbaum MH, Stegner SE (1979) Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge’s point of view. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(1):48–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birnbaum MH, Coffey G, Mellers BA, Weiss R (1992) Utility measurement: Configural-weight theory and the judge’s point of view. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance 18(2):337–346.Google Scholar
  • Brenner L, Rottenstreich Y, Sood S, Bilgin B (2007) On the psychology of loss aversion: Possession, valence, and reversals of the endowment effect. J. Consumer Res. 34(3):369–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cherry B, Ordóñez LD, Gilliland SW (2003) Grade expectations: the effects of expectations on fairness and satisfaction perceptions. J. Behav. Decision Making 16(5):375–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes RM (1964) Social selection based on multidimensional criteria. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 68(1):104–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhar R, Simonson I (1999) Making complementary choices in consumption episodes: Highlighting vs. balancing. J. Marketing Res. 36(1):29–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Einhorn HJ (1970) The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psych. Bull. 73(3):221–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein SR, Fishbach A (2010) When healthy food makes you hungry. J. Consumer Res. 37(3):357–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer GW (1976) Multidimensional utility models for risky and riskless choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 17(1):127–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishbach A, Dhar R (2005) Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. J. Consumer Res. 32(3):370–377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC, Wakker PP (1995) The invention of the independence condition for preferences. Management Sci. 41(7):1130–1144.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002a) What can economists learn from happiness research? J. Econom. Literature 40(2):402–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002b) Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Well-Being (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Fulford D, Johnson SL, Llabre MM, Carver CS (2010) Pushing and coasting in dynamic goal pursuit: Coasting is attenuated in bipolar disorder. Psych Sci. 21(7):1021–1027.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchinson JW, Kamakura WA, Lynch JG (2000) Unobserved heterogeneity as an alternative explanation for “reversal” effects in behavioral research. J. Consumer Res. 27(3):324–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (1992) Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(2):296–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Knetsch J, Thaler R (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1325–1348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • King LA, Burton CM (2003) The hazards of goal pursuit. Chang EC, Sanna LJ, eds. Vice, Virtue, and Personality: The Complexity of Behavior (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 53–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham G (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Louro MJ, Pieters R, Zeelenberg M (2007) Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(2):174–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markle A, Wu G, White R, Sackett A (2018) Goals as reference points in marathon running: A novel test of reference-dependence. J. Risk Uncertainty 56(1):19–50.Google Scholar
  • Masicampo EJ, Baumeister RF (2011) Consider it done! Plan making can eliminate cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(4):667–683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGraw AP, Larsen JT, Kahneman D, Schkade D (2010) Comparing gains and losses. Psych. Sci. 21(10):1438–1445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mellers BA (2000) Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psych. Bull. 126(6):910–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mellers BA, Schwartz A, Ritov I (1999) Emotion-based choice. J. Experiment. Psych. General 128(3):332–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mellers BA, Schwartz A, Ho K, Ritov I (1997) Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psych Sci. 8(6):423–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novemsky N, Kahneman D (2005) The boundaries of loss aversion. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):119–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ordóñez LD, Wu G (2014) Goals and decision making. Highhouse S, Dalal RS, Salas E, eds. Judgment and Decision Making (Routledge, New York), 123–139.Google Scholar
  • Ordóñez LD, Connolly T, Coughlan R (2000) Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. J. Behav. Decision Making 13(3):329–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osviankina M (1928) Die Wiederaufnahme unterbrochener Handlungen. Psych. Forsch. 11(1):302–379.Google Scholar
  • Pope D, Schweitzer M (2011) Is Tiger Woods loss averse? Persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):129–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riskey DR, Birnbaum MH (1974) Compensatory effects in moral judgment: Two rights don’t make up for a wrong. J. Experiment. Psych. 103(1):171–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt K-H, Kleinbeck U, Brockmann W (1984) Motivational control of motor performance by goal setting in a dual-task situation. Psych. Res. 46(1):129–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. 16(2):158–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sullivan K, Kida T (1995) The effect of multiple reference points and prior gains and losses on managers’ risky decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 64(1):76–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R (1999) Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3):183–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039–1061.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang XT, Johnson JG (2012) A tri-reference point theory of decision making under risk. J. Experiment. Psych. General 141(4):743–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weaver R, Frederick S (2012) A reference price theory of the endowment effect. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):696–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolfinger R, Chang M (1998) Comparing the SAS GLM and MIXED procedures for repeated measures. White paper, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.