Sharing Guilt: How Better Access to Information May Backfire

References

• Ahmad F, Hudak PL, Bercovitz K, Hollenberg E, Levinson W (2006) Are physicians ready for patients with internet-based health information? J. Medical Internet Res. 8(3):e22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alicke MD, Mandel DR, Hilton DJ, Gerstenberg T, Lagnado DA (2015) Causal conceptions in social explanation and moral evaluation: A historical tour. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 10(6):790–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambuehl S, Ockenfels A, Stewart C (2018) Attention and selection effects. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Anagol S, Kim HH (2012) The impact of shrouded fees: Evidence from a natural experiment in the Indian mutual funds market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):576–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attanasi G, Battigalli P, Manzoni E (2015) Incomplete-information models of guilt aversion in the trust game. Management Sci. 62(3):648–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos JY (1997) Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. 43(12):1676–1692.Link, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fischbacher U (2012) Shifting the blame: On delegation and responsibility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(1):67–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fischbacher U, Schudy S (2015) Pivotality and responsibility attribution in sequential voting. J. Public Econom. 128(August):133–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battigalli P, Dufwenberg M (2007) Guilt in games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):170–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battigalli P, Dufwenberg M (2009) Dynamic psychological games. J. Econom. Theory 144(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck A, Kerschbamer R, Qiu J, Sutter M (2013) Shaping beliefs in experimental markets for expert services: Guilt aversion and the impact of promises and money-burning options. Games Econom. Behav. 81(September):145–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellemare C, Sebald A, Strobel M (2011) Measuring the willingness to pay to avoid guilt: Estimation using equilibrium and stated belief models. J. Appl. Econometrics 26(3):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2—Correlation between subjects. BMJ 310(6980):633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Fatas E, Haruvy E, Lagos F (2015) The impact of relative position and returns on sacrifice and reciprocity: An experimental study using individual decisions. Soc. Choice Welfare 45(3):489–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Moore DA (2005) The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. J. Legal Stud. 34(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Moore DA (2011) When sunlight fails to disinfect: Understanding the perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. J. Consumer Res. 37(5):836–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Fest S, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2016) Choice and personal responsibility: What is a morally relevant choice? NHH Department of Economics Discussion Paper 27/2014, NHH Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen.Google Scholar
• Charness G (2000) Responsibility and effort in an experimental labor market. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 42(3):375–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74(6):1579–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Jiménez N, Lacomba JA, Lagos F (2012) The hidden advantage of delegation: Pareto improvements in a gift exchange game. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2358–2379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman LC (2011) Intermediation reduces punishment (and reward). Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(4):77–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Friedman D, Sadiraj V (2008) Revealed altruism. Econometrica 76(1):31–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Servátka M, Vadovič R (2010) Saliency of outside options in the lost wallet game. Experiment. Econom. 13(1):66–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis CG, Lehman DR, Silver RC, Wortman CB, Ellard JH (1996) Self-blame following a traumatic event: The role of perceived avoidability. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(6):557–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duarte F, Hastings JS (2012) Fettered consumers and sophisticated firms: Evidence from Mexico’s privatized social security market. NBER Working Paper w18582, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Gneezy U (2000) Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games Econom. Behav. 30(2):163–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Kirchsteiger G (2004) A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. 47(2):268–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2008) Pride and prejudice: The human side of incentive theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):990–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M, Tjøtta S, Torsvik G (2010) Testing guilt aversion. Games Econom. Behav. 68(1):95–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engl F (2017) A theory of causal responsibility attribution. Working paper, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Szech N (2013) Organizations, diffused pivotality and immoral outcomes. CESifo Working Paper 4300, Ifo Institute, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C, Gneezy U (2001) Strategic delegation: An experiment. RAND J. Econom. 32(2):352–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garofalo O, Rott C (2018) Shifting blame? Experimental evidence on delegating communication. Management Sci. 64(8):3911–3925.Link, Google Scholar
• Geanakoplos J, Pearce D, Stacchetti E (1989) Psychological games and sequential rationality. Games Econom. Behav. 1(1):60–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillen B, Snowberg E, Yariv L (2015) Experimenting with measurement error: Techniques with applications to the Caltech Cohort Study. NBER Working Paper w21517, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rockenbach B, Serra-Garcia M (2013) Measuring lying aversion. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 93(September):293–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golan E, Kuchler F, Mitchell L, Greene C, Jessup A (2001) Economics of food labeling. J. Consumer Policy 24(2):117–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldmanis M, Hortaçsu A, Syverson C, Emre Ö (2010) E‐commerce and the market structure of retail industries. Econom. J. 120(545):651–682.Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamman JR, Loewenstein G, Weber RA (2010) Self-interest through delegation: An additional rationale for the principal-agent relationship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1826–1846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2012) Competition through commissions and kickbacks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):780–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kartik N (2009) Strategic communication with lying costs. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(4):1359–1395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaufmann D, Bellver A (2005) Transparenting transparency: Initial empirics and policy applications. World Bank policy research working paper, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Kawagoe T, Narita Y (2014) Guilt aversion revisited: An experimental test of a new model. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 102(June):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khalmetski K (2016) Testing guilt aversion with an exogenous shift in beliefs. Games Econom. Behav. 97(May):110–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khalmetski K, Ockenfels A, Werner P (2015) Surprising gifts: Theory and laboratory evidence. J. Econom. Theory 159(A):163–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozup J, Hogarth JM (2008) Financial literacy, public policy, and consumers’ self‐protection—More questions, fewer answers. J. Consumer Affairs 42(2):127–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacko J, Pappalardo J (2007) Improving consumer mortgage disclosures: An empirical assessment of current and prototype disclosure forms. Bureau of Economics staff report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Levine DK (1998) Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Rev. Econom. Dynam. 1(3):593–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandel D (2003) Counterfactuals, emotions, and context. Cognition Emotion 17(1):139–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Turnbull W (1990) The counterfactual fallacy: Confusing what might have been with what ought to have been. Soc. Justice Res. 4(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oexl R, Grossman ZJ (2013) Shifting the blame to a powerless intermediary. Experiment. Econom. 16(3):306–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2009) Is mistrust self–fulfilling? Econom. Lett. 104(2):89–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Servátka M, Vadovič R (2009) Unequal outside options in the lost wallet game. Econom. Bull. 29(4):2870–2883.Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(3):393–410.Google Scholar
• Stoddard GJ (2011) Biostatistics and Epidemiology Using Stata: A Course Manual (University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City).Google Scholar
• Vanberg C (2008) Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76(6):1467–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woods D, Servátka M (2016) Testing psychological forward induction and the updating of beliefs in the lost wallet game. J. Econom. Psych. 56(October):116–125.Crossref, Google Scholar