“Dice”-sion–Making Under Uncertainty: When Can a Random Decision Reduce Risk?

References

• Agranov M, Ortoleva P (2017) Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. J. Political Econom. 125(1):40–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• An B, Tambe M, Sinha A (2016) Stackelberg security games (SSG): Basics and application overview. Abbas A, Tambe M, von Winterfeldt D, eds. Improving Homeland Security Decisions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 485–507.Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barks C (1953) Flip Decision, Walt Disney Comics & Stories 149, vol. 13, no. 5 (Walt Disney Company, Burbank, CA).Google Scholar
• Bäuerle N, Müller A (2006) Stochastic orders and risk measures: Consistency and bounds. Insurance, Math., Econom. 38(1):132–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellini F, Bignozzi V (2015) On elicitable risk measures. Quant. Finance 15(5):725–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Teboulle M (2007) An old-new concept of convex risk measures: The optimized certainty equivalent. Math. Finance 17(3):449–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Ghaoui LE, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust Optimization (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Nasrabadi E, Orlin JB (2016) On the power of randomization in network interdiction. Oper. Res. Lett. 44(1):114–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birge JR, Louveaux F (2000) Introduction to Stochastic Programming (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Bryan G, Karlan D, Nelson S (2010) Commitment devices. Ann. Rev. Econom. 2(1):671–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical Inference, 2nd ed. (Duxbury Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Cettolin E, Riedl A (2016) Revealed incomplete preferences under uncertainty: Evidence for bewley preferences. Working paper, Tilburg University, Warandelaan, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Shen ZJM, Siddiq A (2015) Robust facility location under demand location uncertainty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Delage E, Lisser A (2014) Distributionally robust stochastic knapsack problem. SIAM J. Optim. 24(3):1485–1506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Leung J, Lisser A (2016) New reformulations of distributionally robust shortest path problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 74:196–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeJarnette P, Dillenberger D, Gottlieb D, Ortoleva P (2018) Time lotteries. PIER Working Paper No. 15-026.Google Scholar
• Delage E, Ye Y (2010) Distributionally robust optimization under moment uncertainty with application to data-driven problems. Oper. Res. 58(3):595–612.Link, Google Scholar
• Dhaene J, Kukush A (2011) Comonotonic modification of random vector in its own probability space. Working paper, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
• Dominiak A, Schnedler W (2011) Attitudes towards uncertainty and randomization: An experimental study. Econom. Theory 48(2):289–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwenger N, Kübler D, Weizsäcker G (2016) Flipping a coin: Evidence from laboratory and field. Technical report, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
• Eichberger J, Kelsey D (1996) Uncertainty aversion and preference for randomisation. J. Econom. Theory 71(1):31–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eichberger J, Grant S, Kelsey D (2016) Randomization and dynamic consistency. Econom. Theory 63(3):547–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein LG (1999) A definition of uncertainty aversion. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(3):579–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard EE (1976) Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the Azande (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Fishburn P (1970) Utility Theory for Decision Making, Operations Research Society of America Edition (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2011) Stochastic Finance—An Introduction in Discrete Time, 3rd ed. (Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghaoui LE, Oks M, Oustry F (2003) Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach. Oper. Res. 51(4):543–556.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh J, Sim M (2010) Distributionally robust optimization and its tractable approximations. Oper. Res. 58(4):902–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Gounaris CE, Wiesemann W, Floudas CA (2013) The robust capacitated vehicle routing problem under demand uncertainty. Oper. Res. 61(3):677–693.Link, Google Scholar
• Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2006) Random expected utility. Econometrica 74(1):121–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey JD, Carbone E (1995) Stochastic choice with deterministic preferences: An experimental investigation. Econom. Lett. 47(2):161–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Guan Y, Watson JP (2016) Risk-averse stochastic unit commitment with incomplete information. IIE Trans. 48(9):838–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jouini E, Schachermayer W, Touzi N (2006) Law invariant risk measures have the Fatou property. Kusuoka S, Yamazaki A, eds. Advances in Mathematical Economics (Springer, Tokyo), 49–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellerer H, Mansini R, Speranza MG (2000) Selecting portfolios with fixed costs and minimum transaction lots. Ann. Oper. Res. 99(1):287–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keynes JM (1921) A Treatise on Probability (Macmillan & Co., London).Google Scholar
• Kircher P, Ludwig S, Sandroni A (2013) On the difference between social and private goods. B. E. J. Theoret. Econom. 13(1):151–177.Google Scholar
• Klibanoff P (1996) Uncertainty, decision and normal form games. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Korzhyk D, Yin Z, Kiekintveld C, Conitzer V, Tambe M (2011) Stackelberg vs. Nash in security games: An extended investigation of interchangeability, equivalence, and uniqueness. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 41(2):297–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kusuoka S (2001) On law invariant coherent risk measures. Kusuoka S, Maruyama T, eds. Advances in Mathematical Economics, vol. 3 (Springer, Tokyo), 83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo KC (1996) Equilibrium in beliefs under uncertainty. J. Econom. Theory 71(2):443–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manzini P, Mariotti M (2014) Stochastic choice and consideration sets. Econometrica 82(3):1153–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mastin A, Jaillet P, Chin S (2014) Randomized minmax regret for combinatorial optimization under uncertainty Elbassioni K, Makino K, eds. Algorithms and Computation. Proc. 26th Internat. Sympos., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9472 (Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany), 491–501.Google Scholar
• Meng F, Qi J, Zhang M, Ang J, Chu S, Sim M (2015) A robust optimization model for managing elective admission in a public hospital. Oper. Res. 63(6):1452–1467.Link, Google Scholar
• Mittal S, Schulz A, Stiller S (2014) Robust appointment scheduling. Jansen K, Rolim J, Devanur N, Moore C, eds. Proc. 17th Internat. Workshop Approximation Randomized Algorithms, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, vol. 28 (Schloss Dagstuhl, Wadern, Germany), 356–370.Google Scholar
• Nash J (1951) Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54(2):286–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postek KS, den Hertog D, Melenberg B (2016) Computationally tractable counterparts of distributionally robust constraints on risk measures. SIAM Rev. 58(4):603–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt M (1952) Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann. Math. Statist. 23(3):470–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2002) Irrational diversification in multiple decision problems. Eur. Econom. Rev 46(8):1369–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saito K (2012) Subjective timing of randomization and ambiguity, Working paper, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.Google Scholar
• Saito K (2015) Preferences for flexibility and randomization under uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(3):1246–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P (1952) Probability, utility, and the independence axiom. Econometrica 20(4):1670–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3):571–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2009) Lectures on Stochastic Programming (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sopher B, Narramore JM (2000) Stochastic choice and consistency in decision making under risk: An experimental study. Theory Decision 48(4):323–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone P (2011) A Treatise on Probability (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Strotz RH (1955–56) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23(3):165–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallec YL (2007) Robust, risk-sensitive, and data-driven control of Markov decision processes. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Rustem B (2014a) Robust Markov decision processes. Math. Oper. Res. 38(1):153–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Sim M (2014b) Distributionally robust convex optimization. Oper. Res. 62(6):1358–1376.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu Z (2007) Spatial energy market risk analysis using the semivariance risk measure. Internat. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 29(8):600–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Fukushima M (2009) Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management. Oper. Res. 57(5):1155–1168.Link, Google Scholar
• Zymler S, Kuhn D, Rustem B (2013) Worst-case value at risk of nonlinear portfolios. Management Sci. 59(1):172–188.Link, Google Scholar