Hidden Persuaders: Do Small Gifts Lubricate Business Negotiations?

References

• Abbink K, Irlenbusch B, Renner E (2002) An experimental bribery game. J. Law Econom. Organ. 18(2):428–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Ubaydli O, List JA (2015) On the generalizability of experimental results in economics. Frechette G, Scotter A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economic Methodology (Oxford University Press, New York), 420–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester D (2011) A step-by-step guide to smart business. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(3):98–105.Google Scholar
• Bawa K, Shoemaker R (2004) The effects of free sample promotions on incremental brand sales. Marketing Sci. 23(3):345–363.Link, Google Scholar
• Bellemare C, Shearer B (2009) Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment. Games Econom. Behav. 67(1):233–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolle F (2001) Why to buy your darling flowers: On cooperation and exploitation. Theory Decision 50(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2016) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3085–3099.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer C (1988) Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(Suppl.):S180–S214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Miller DL (2015) A Practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J. Human Resource 50(2):317–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell EG, Gruen RL, Mountford J, Miller LG, Cleary PD, Blumenthal D (2007) A national survey of physician–industry relationships. New England J. Med. 356(17):1742–1750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmichael HL, MacLeod WB (1997) Gift giving and the evolution of cooperation. Internat. Econom. Rev. 38(3):485–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J (2017) The sequencing of gift exchange: A field trial. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 139:26–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Ernan H, Sonsino D (2007) Social distance and reciprocity: An internet experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63(1):88–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (1985) Influence: Science and Practice (Scott, Foresman and Company, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Goette L (2015) Fair wages and effort provision: Combining evidence from a choice experiment and a field experiment. Management Sci. 61(8):1777–1794.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Herrmann B, Schneider F (2014) Social comparison and effort provision: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):877–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Currie J, Lin W, Meng J (2013) Social networks and externalities from gift exchange: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Public Econom. 107:19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Lit. 47(2):315–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna, S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G (2016) Estimating social preferences and gift exchange at work. NBER Working Paper 22043, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2011) Conspicuous generosity. J. Public Econom. 95(9):1131–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esteves-Sorenson C (2018) Gift exchange in the workplace: Addressing the conflicting evidence with a careful test. Management Sci. 64(9):4365–4388.Link, Google Scholar
• Fain H (2002) The case for a zero gift policy. Public Integrity 4(1):61–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A (2007) Gift-exchange in the field. Econometrica 75(5):1501–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Heckmann JJ (2009) Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(3):159–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Goette L, Zehnder C (2009) A behavioral account of the labor market: The role of fairness concerns. Annual Rev. Econom. 1(1):355–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher J (2007) Business marketing and the ethics of gift giving. Indust. Marketing Management 36(1):99–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagnon M-A, Lexchin J (2008) The cost of pushing pills: A new estimate of pharmaceutical promotion expenditures in the United States. PLoS Medicine 5(1):e1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rey-Biel P (2014) On the relative efficiency of performance pay and noncontingent incentives. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(1):62–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Saccardo S, Veldhuizen V (2015) Bribery: Behavioral drivers of distorted decisions. Working paper, University of California San Diego, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grande D (2010) Limiting the influence of pharmaceutical industry gifts on physicians: Self-regulation or government intervention? J. Gen. Internal Medicine 25(1):79–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Lit. 42(4):1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith VL (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):653–660.Google Scholar
• Kaplan TR, Ruffle BJ (2009) Search of welfare-improving gifts. Eur. Econom. Rev. 53(4):445–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz D, Caplan AL, Merz JF (2003) All gifts large and small: Toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. Amer. J. Bioethics 3(3):39–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirchler M, Palan S (2018) Immaterial and monetary gifts in economic transactions: Evidence from the field. Experiment. Econom. 21(1):205–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2012) The currency of reciprocity: Gift-exchange in the workplace. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1644–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2013) Do wage cuts damage work morale? Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(4):853–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lammers BH (1991) The effect of free samples on the immediate consumer purchase. J. Consumer Marketing 8(2):31–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences tell us about the real world. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(2):153–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2006) The behavioralist meets the market: Measuring social preferences and reputation effects in actual transactions. J. Political Econom. 114(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2011) Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(3):3–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2016) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. NBER Working Paper 21875, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Schmidt K (2017) You owe me. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(2):493–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maréchal MA, Thöni C (2007) Do managers reciprocate? Field experimental evidence from a competitive market. Discussion Paper 2007-09, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Mauss M (1967) The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies (W. W. Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• McCracken GK, Callahan TJ (1996) Is there such a thing as a free lunch? Internat. J. Purchasing Materials Management 32(4):44–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislators (2018) Legislator gift restrictions overview. Retrieved July 13, http://tinyurl.com/mhvqvcr.Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2006) Evidence-based management. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(1):62–74.Google Scholar
• Prendergast C, Stole L (2001) The non-monetary nature of gifts. Eur. Econom. Rev. 45(10):1793–1810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman S (1998) Bribes and gifts. Ben-Ner A, Putterman L, eds. Economics, Values and Organization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 296–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott CA (1976) The effects of trial incentives on repeat purchase behavior. J. Marketing Res. 13(3):263–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer E, Van Hoewyk J, Maher MP (2000) Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quart. 64(2):171–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sozou PD, Seymour RM (2005) Costly but worthless gifts facilitate courtship. Proc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272(1575):1877–1884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinberg SA, Yalch RF (1978) When eating begets buying: The effects of food samples on obese and nonobese shoppers. J. Consumer Res. 4(4):243–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strohmetz DB, Rind B, Fisher R, Lynn M (2002) Sweetening the till: The use of candy to increase restaurant tipping. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 32(2):300–3009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Susman TM (2008) Private ethics, public conduct: An essay on ethical lobbying, campaign contributions, reciprocity, and the public good. Stanford Law Policy Rev. 19:10–22.Google Scholar
• Trawick IF, Swan JE, Rink D (1989) Industrial buyer evaluation of the ethics of salesperson gift giving; value of the gift and customer vs. prospect status. J. Personal Selling Sales Management 9(2):31–38.Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (1993) The deadweight loss of Christmas. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1328–1336.Google Scholar
• Wazana A (2000) Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: Is a gift ever just a gift? J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 283(3):373–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weintraub A (2007) Will pharma finally have to fess up? Bloomberg Business (October 8), http://tinyurl.com/zxtgq3y.Google Scholar
• Williams P, Fitzsimons GJ, Block LG (2004) When consumers do not recognize “benign” intention questions as persuasion attempts. J. Consumer Res. 31(3):540–550.Crossref, Google Scholar