Buyer Uncertainty About Seller Capacity: Causes, Consequences, and a Partial Solution

References

• Agrawal AK, Lacetera N, Lyons E (2016) Does standardized information in online markets disproportionately benefit job applicants from less developed countries? J. Internat. Econom. 103:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal AK, Horton J, Lacetera N, Lyons E (2015) Digitization and the contract labor market: A research agenda. Goldfarb A, Greenstein SM, Tucker CE, eds. Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allon G, Bassamboo A, Çil EB (2012) Large-scale service marketplaces: The role of the moderating firm. Management Sci. 58(10):1854–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnosti N, Johari J, Kanoria Y (2014) Managing congestion in decentralized matching markets. Proc. ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 451–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Tadelis S (2001) Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. 32(3):387–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barach M, Horton J, Golden J (2018) “Skin-in-the-game” and platform credibility: Evidence from field experiments. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(430):443–450.Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Halaburda H (2014) When does a platform create value by limiting choice? J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):464–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimoka A, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2012) On product uncertainty in online markets: Theory and evidence. MIS Quart. 36(2):395–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farronato C, Cullen Z (2015) Outsourcing tasks online: Matching supply and demand on peer-to-peer internet platforms. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Filippas A, Horton J, Golden J (2018) Reputation inflation. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Fradkin A (2014) Search frictions and the design of online marketplaces. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Carmel E (2008) Is the world really flat? A look at offshoring at an online programming marketplace. MIS Quart. 32(2):367–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes P, Lin M (2012) Does information really ‘unravel’? Understanding factors that motivate sellers to seek third-party certifications in an online labor market. Working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Piskorski M (2010) When should a platform give people fewer choices and charge more for them? Antitrust Chronicle 7(2).Google Scholar
• Hall JV, Krueger AB (2016) An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2017) On buyer selection of service providers in online outsourcing platforms for IT services. Inform. Res. 28(3):547–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Wang C, Pavlou PA (2015) Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from online labor markets. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):49–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Horton J (2017a) The effects of algorithmic labor market recommendations: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):345–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horton J (2017b) Price floors and employer preferences: Evidence from a minimum wage experiment. Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business, New York.Google Scholar
• Horton J, Johari R (2018) Engineering a separating equilibrium. Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business, New York.Google Scholar
• Lewis G, Wang A (2013) Who benefits from improved search in platform markets? Working paper, Microsoft Research New England, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Pallais A (2014) Inefficient hiring in entry-level labor markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(11):3565–3599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J, Lockwood K (2006) The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experiment. Econom. 9(2):79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snir EM, Hitt LM (2003) Costly bidding in online markets for it services. Management Sci. 49(11):1504–1520.Link, Google Scholar
• Stanton CT, Thomas C (2016) Landing the first job: The value of intermediaries in online hiring. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):810–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tadelis S, Zettelmeyer F (2015) Information disclosure as a matching mechanism: Theory and evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):886–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2013) The value of reputation in an online freelance marketplace. Marketing Sci. 32(6):860–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Young A (2018) Consistency without inference: Instrumental variables in practical application. Working paper, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar