Moral Perceptions of Advised Actions

References

• Azrieli Y, Chambers CP, Healy PJ (2018) Incentives in experiments: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. 126(4):1472–1503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fischbacher U (2012) Shifting the blame: On delegation and responsibility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(1):67–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Engl F, Weber RA (2014a) Does willful ignorance deflect punishment?—An experimental study. Eur. Econom. Rev. 70(August 2014):512–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fehr E, Herz H (2014b) The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica 82(6):2005–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Fried JM (2003) Executive compensation as an agency problem. J Econom. Perspect. 17(3):71–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonaccio S, Dalal RS (2006) Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2):127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bornstein G, Yaniv I (1998) Individual and group behavior in the ultimatum game: Are groups more “rational” players? Experimental Econom. 1(1):101–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Wang JT-Y (2006) Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games. Games Econom. Behav. 56(1):7–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Moore DA (2005) The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of Interest. J. Legal Stud. 34(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Mui V-L (1998) Social influence in the sequential dictator game. J. Math. Psych. 42(2–3):248–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Çelen B, Kariv S, Schotter A (2010) An experimental test of advice and social learning. Management Sci. 56(10):1687–1701.Link, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Schram A (2015) Inducing social norms in laboratory allocation choices. Management Sci. 61(7):1531–1546.Link, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Sutter M (2012) Groups make better self-interested decisions. J. Econom. Perspect. 26(3):157–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Gesche T (2017) Persistent bias in advice-giving. Working Paper No. 228, University of Zurich, Switzerland.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu J, Faasse J, Raghavendra Rau P (2018) Do compensation consultants enable higher CEO pay? A disclosure rule change as a separating device. Management Sci. 64(10):4915–4935.Google Scholar
• Coffman LC (2011) Intermediation reduces punishment (and reward). Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(4):77–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC (2002) Trust, reciprocity, and other-regarding preferences: Groups vs. individuals and males vs. females. Zwick R, Rapoport A, eds. Experimental Business Research (Springer, Boston), 331–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Weber RA, Kuang JX (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demski JS (2003) Corporate conflicts of interest. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(2):51–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickhaut JW, McCabe KA, Mukherji A (1995) An experimental study of strategic information transmission. Econom. Theory 6(3):389–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Herz H, Wilkening T (2013) The lure of authority: Motivation and incentive effects of power. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1325–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C, Gneezy U (2001) Strategic delegation: An experiment. RAND J. Econom. 32(2):352–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerster SR, Linnainmaa JT, Melzer BT, Previtero A (2017) Retail financial advice: Does one size fit all? J. Finance. 72(4):1441–1482.Google Scholar
• Gehrig T, Güth W, Levínskỳ R, Popova V (2010) On the evolution of professional consulting. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(1):113–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Saccardo S, Serra-Garcia M, Veldhuizen RV (2016) Bribing the self. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Green JR, Stokey NL (2007) A two-person game of information transmission. J. Econom. Theory 135(1):90–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2004) The online recruitment system ORSEE 2.0–A guide for the organization of experiments in economics. Working Paper Series in Economics 10(23):63–104, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Hamman JR, Loewenstein G, Weber RA (2010) Self-interest through delegation: An additional rationale for the principal-agent relationship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1826–1846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey N, Fischer I (1997) Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 70(2):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He H, Villeval MC (2017) Are group members less inequality averse than individual decision makers? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 138 (June):111–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inderst R, Khalmetski K, Ockenfels A (2019) Sharing guilt: How better access to information may backfire. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print March 29, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3101.Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, McGee P (2016) Team versus individual play in finitely repeated prisoner dilemma games. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 8(2):253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray L, Gonzalez R (1999) Differential weighting in choice versus advice: I’ll do this, you do that. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3):207–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuang XJ, Weber RA, Dana J (2007) How effective is advice from interested parties? An experimental test using a pure coordination game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 62(4):591–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kugler T, Bornstein G, Kocher MG, Sutter M (2007) Trust between individuals and groups: Groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy. J. Econom. Psych. 28(6):646–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhan WJ, Kocher MG, Sutter M (2009) Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered. Exp. Econom. 12(1):26–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Shanthikumar D (2007) Are small investors naive about incentives? J. Financial Econom. 85(2):457–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Shanthikumar D (2014) Do security analysts speak in two tongues? Rev. Financial Stud. 27(5):1287–1322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S, Noeth M, Schoar A (2012) The market for financial advice: An audit study. NBER Working Paper 17929, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Murphy KJ, Sandino T (2010) Executive pay and “independent” compensation consultants. J. Account. Econom. 49(3):247–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oexl R, Grossman ZJ (2013) Shifting the blame to a powerless intermediary. Exp. Econom. 16(3):306–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paharia N, Kassam KS, Greene JD, Bazerman MH (2009) Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109(2):134–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sah S, Loewenstein G, Cain DM (2013) The burden of disclosure: Increased compliance with distrusted advice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(2):289–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schotter A (2003) Decision making with naive advice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):196–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skapinker M (2015) Executive pay: The battle to align risks and rewards. Financial Times (April 30), http://www.ft.com/content/9265406a-eaaf-11e4-96ec-00144feab7de.Google Scholar