When You Work with a Superman, Will You Also Fly? An Empirical Study of the Impact of Coworkers on Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3135

References

  • Abowd JM, Kramarz F, Margolis DN (1999) High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica 67(2):251–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akşin Z, Armony M, Mehrotra V (2007) The modern call center: A multi-disciplinary perspective on operations management research. Production Oper. Management 16(6):665–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akşin Z, Deo S, Jonasson J, Ramdas K (2015) Learning from many: Partner diversity and team familiarity in fluid teams. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
  • Albright S, Winston WL (2014) Business Analytics: Data Analysis & Decision Making (Nelson Education, Toronto).Google Scholar
  • Angrist J, Krueger AB (1994) Why do World War II veterans earn more than nonveterans? J. Labor Econom. 12(1):74–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arlotto A, Chick SE, Gans N (2013) Optimal hiring and retention policies for heterogeneous workers who learn. Management Sci. 60(1):110–129.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ata B, Van Mieghem JA (2009) The value of partial resource pooling: Should a service network be integrated or product-focused? Management Sci. 55(1):115–131.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2009) Social connections and incentives in the workplace: Evidence from personnel data. Econometrica 77(4):1047–1094.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):417–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barankay I (2012) Rank incentives: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Working paper, Wharton School, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Bard JF, Wan L (2008) Workforce design with movement restrictions between workstation groups. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(1):24–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhulai S, Koole G, Pot A (2008) Simple methods for shift scheduling in multiskill call centers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):411–420.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown DJ, Ferris DL, Heller D, Keeping LM (2007) Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(1):59–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buunk BP, Collins RL, Taylor SE, VanYperen NW, Dakof GA (1990) The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(6):1238–1249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D, Frei F (2011) Market heterogeneity and local capacity decisions in services. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(1):2–19.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carrell SE, Fullerton RL, West JE (2009) Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. J. Labor Econom. 27(3):439–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carrell SE, Sacerdote BI, West JE (2013) From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica 81(3):855–882.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cezik MT, L’Ecuyer P (2008) Staffing multiskill call centers via linear programming and simulation. Management Sci. 54(2):310–323.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chan DC (2016) Teamwork and moral hazard: Evidence from the emergency department. J. Political Econom. 124(3):734–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014a) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014b) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management 23(3):239–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeHoratius N, Raman A (2007) Store manager incentive design and retail performance: An exploratory investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):518–534.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman R (2008) Labour Productivity Indicators: Comparison of Two OECD Databases, Productivity Differentials and the Balassa-Samuelson Effect (OECD Statistics Directorate, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Freeman M, Savva N, Scholtes S (2015) Gatekeepers at work: An empirical analysis of a maternity unit. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
  • Gans N, Koole G, Mandelbaum A (2003) Telephone call centers: Tutorial, review, and research prospects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(2):79–141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gray JV, Siemsen E, Vasudeva G (2015) Colocation still matters: Conformance quality and the interdependence of R&D and manufacturing in the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. 61(11):2760–2781.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guimera R, Uzzi B, Spiro J, Amaral LAN (2005) Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 308(5722):697–702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guryan J, Kroft K, Notowidigdo MJ (2009) Peer effects in the workplace: Evidence from random groupings in professional golf tournaments. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(4):34–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoegl M, Proserpio L (2004) Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects. Res. Policy 33(8):1153–1165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hölmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoorens V (1993) Self-enhancement and superiority biases in social comparison. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 4(1):113–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp WJ, Tekin E, Van Oyen MP (2004) Benefits of skill chaining in serial production lines with cross-trained workers. Management Sci. 50(1):83–98.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iravani SMR, Kolfal B, Van Oyen MP (2007) Call-center labor cross-training: It’s a small world after all. Management Sci. 53(7):1102–1112.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Itoh H (1991) Incentives to help in multi-agent situations. Econometrica 59(3):611–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kandel E, Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. 100(4):801–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katzenbach JR, Smith DK (1993) The Discipline of Teams (Harvard Business Press, Watertown, MA).Google Scholar
  • Kennedy P (2003) A Guide to Econometrics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Kesavan S, Staats BR, Gilland W (2014) Volume flexibility in services: The costs and benefits of flexible labor resources. Management Sci. 60(8):1884–1906.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuziemko I, Buell RW, Reich T, Norton MI (2014) Last-place aversion: Evidence and redistributive implications. Quart. J. Econom. 129(1):105–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré MA, Mukherjee AS, Van Wassenhove LN (2000) Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Sci. 46(5):597–611.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lind JT, Mehlum H (2010) With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 72(1):109–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luttmer EF (2004) Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehrotra V, Ross K, Ryder G, Zhou YP (2012) Routing to manage resolution and waiting time in call centers with heterogeneous servers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(1):66–81.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mill RC (2006) Restaurant Management: Customers, Operations, and Employees (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Moretti E (2004a) Estimating the social return to higher education: Evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data. J. Econom. 121(1):175–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moretti E (2004b) Workers’ education, spillovers, and productivity: Evidence from plant-level production functions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):656–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Balasubramanian S, Swaminathan JM (2009) A matter of balance: Specialization, task variety, and individual learning in a software maintenance environment. Management Sci. 55(11):1861–1876.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nembhard IM, Tucker AL (2011) Deliberate learning to improve performance in dynamic service settings: Evidence from hospital intensive care units. Organ. Sci. 22(4):907–922.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Connor EJ, Peters LH, Pooyan A, Weekley J, Frank B, Erenkrantz B (1984) Situational constraint effects on performance, affective reactions, and turnover: A field replication and extension. J. Appl. Psych. 69(4):663–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano GP, Bohmer RM, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roels G, Su X (2013) Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Sci. 60(3):606–627.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz KL, Schoenherr T, Nembhard D (2010) An example and a proposal concerning the correlation of worker processing times in parallel tasks. Management Sci. 56(1):176–191.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shafer SM, Nembhard DA, Uzumeri MV (2001) The effects of worker learning, forgetting, and heterogeneity on assembly line productivity. Management Sci. 47(12):1639–1653.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siebert WS, Zubanov N (2010) Management economics in a large retail company. Management Sci. 56(8):1398–1414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siemsen E, Balasubramanian S, Roth AV (2007) Incentives that induce task-related effort, helping, and knowledge sharing in workgroups. Management Sci. 53(10):1533–1550.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simonsohn U (2016) Two-lines: The first valid test of u-shaped relationships. Working paper, Wharton School, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Song H, Tucker A, Murrel K, Vinson D (2015) Learning from the best: The effects of public relative performance feedback on variability and productivity. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Staats BR, Gino F (2012) Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Sci. 58(6):1141–1159.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Staats B, KC DS, Gino F (2015) Blinded by experience: Prior experience, negative news and belief updating. Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  • Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan TF, Netessine S (2014) When does the devil make work? An empirical study of the impact of workload on worker productivity. Management Sci. 60(6):1574–1593.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Velleman PF, Hoaglin DC (1981) Applications, Basics, and Computing of Exploratory Data Analysis (Duxbury Press, Independence, KY).Google Scholar
  • Villas-Boas JM, Winer RS (1999) Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. 45(10):1324–1338.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walker JR (2007) The Restaurant, Study Guide: From Concept to Operation (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Wallace RB, Whitt W (2005) A staffing algorithm for call centers with skill-based routing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(4):276–294.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ward AR, Armony M (2013) Blind fair routing in large-scale service systems with heterogeneous customers and servers. Oper. Res. 61(1):228–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wiersma E (2007) Conditions that shape the learning curve: Factors that increase the ability and opportunity to learn. Management Sci. 53(12):1903–1915.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.