Information Transparency in Business-to-Business Auction Markets: The Role of Winner Identity Disclosure

References

• Abadie A (2005) Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adair JG (1984) The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. J. Appl. Psych. 69(2):334–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Curley S, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2012) Effect of information feedback on bidder behavior in continuous combinatorial auctions. Management Sci. 58(4):811–830.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Greenwald A, Kannan K, Krishnan R (2007) Effects of information-revelation policies under market-structure uncertainty. Management Sci. 53(8):1234–1248.Link, Google Scholar
• Aseff J, Chade H (2008) An optimal auction with identity-dependent externalities. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):731–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Levin J, Seira E (2011) Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from timber auctions. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):207–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Yeo J (2009) Auction design and tacit collusion in FCC spectrum auctions. Inform. Econom. Policy 21(2):90–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beggs A, Graddy K (1997) Declining values and the afternoon effect: Evidence from art auctions. RAND J. Econom. 28(3):544–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Hörner J (2017) Should auctions be transparent? Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1764R2, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bichler M, Gupta A, Ketter W (2010) Designing smart markets. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):688–699.Link, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Kannan KN, Siebert R (2011) An experimental study of information revelation policies in sequential auctions. Management Sci. 57(4):667–688.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho S, Paarsch H, Rust J (2014) Is the “linkage principle” valid? Evidence from the field. J. Indust. Econom. 62(2):346–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton P, Schwartz J (2000) Collusive bidding: Lessons from the FCC spectrum auctions. J. Regul. Econom. 17(3):229–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delgado MR, Schotter A, Ozbay EY, Phelps EA (2008) Understanding overbidding: Using the neural circuitry of reward to design economic auctions. Science 321(5897):1849–1852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donald SG, Paarsch HJ, Robert J (2006) An empirical model of the multi-unit, sequential, clock auction. J. Appl. Econometrics 21(8):1221–1247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Selten R (2002) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes P, Karuga G, Tripathi A (2010) Understanding willingness to pay formation of repeat bidders in online sequential auction. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):907–924.Link, Google Scholar
• Greenwood B, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Quart. 41(1):163–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haberbush KL (2000) Limiting the government’s exposure to bid rigging schemes: A critical look at the sealed bidding regime. Public Contract Law J. 30(1):97–122.Google Scholar
• Harrington JE (2012) A theory of tacit collusion. Working paper No. 588, Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University,Baltimore.Google Scholar
• Heyman JE, Orhun Y, Ariely D (2004) Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations. J. Interactive Marketing 18(4):7–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Wang C, Pavlou P (2016) Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from online labor markets. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):49–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econom. Lit. 47(1):5–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehiel P, Moldovanu B (1996) Strategic nonparticipation. RAND J. Econom. 27(1):84–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeitschko TD (1998) Learning in sequential auctions. Southern Econom. J. 65(1):98–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1999) Auction theory: A guide to the literature. J. Econom. Surveys 13(3):227–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koppius OR (2002) Information architecture and electronic market performance. PhD thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Tan Y (2015) The demand effects of joint product advertising in online videos. Management Sci. 61(8):1921–1937.Link, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Larsen BJ, Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2016) Bid takers or market makers? The effect of auctioneers on auction outcome. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 8(4):195–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Gupta A, Ketter W, van Heck E (2016) Exploring bidder heterogeneity in multichannel sequential B2B auctions. MIS Quart. 40(3):645–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall R, Marx L (2009) The vulnerability of auctions to bidder collusion. Quart. J. Econom. 124(2):883–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee R, Vincent D (1993) The declining price anomaly. J. Econom. Theory 60(1):191–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Weber RJ (1982) The value of information in a sealed-bid auction. J. Math. Econom. 10(1):105–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Selten R (2005) Impulse balance equilibrium and feedback in first price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 51(1):155–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Overby E, Kannan K (2015) How reduced search costs and the distribution of bidder participation affect auction prices. Management Sci. 61(6):1398–1420.Link, Google Scholar
• Perry M, Reny P (1999) On the failure of the linkage principle in multi-unit auctions. Econometrica 67(4):895–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2002) The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70(4):1341–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlag K (1998) Why imitate, and if so, how? A boundedly rational approach to multi-armed bandits. J. Econom. Theory 78(1):130–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R, Abbink K, Cox R (2005) Learning direction theory and the winner’s curse. Experiment. Econom. 8(1):5–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sherstyuk K, Dulatre J (2008) Market performance and collusion in sequential and simultaneous multi-object auctions: Evidence from an ascending auctions experiment. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(2):557–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith C (2007) Markets as definitional practices. Canadian J. Sociol. 32(1):1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snir E, Hitt L (2003) Costly bidding in online markets for it services. Management Sci. 49(11):1504–1520.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Dawande M, Janakiraman G, Mookerjee V (2016) The making of a good impression: Information hiding in ad exchanges. MIS Quart. 40(3):717–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tadelis S, Zettelmeyer F (2015) Information disclosure as a matching mechanism: Theory and evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(2):886–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tu Z (2005) Why do we use the Dutch auction to sell flowers? Information disclosure in sequential auctions. Discussion paper, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• van den Berg GJ, van Ours J, Pradhan M (2001) The declining price anomaly in Dutch Dutch rose auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):1055–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varma GD (2002a) Standard auctions with identity-dependent externalities. RAND J. Econom. 33(4):689–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varma GD (2002b) Who else is bidding? The Pareto optimality of disclosing bidder identities. Rev. Econom. Design 7(2):155–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, vol. 8 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber R (1983) Multiple-object auctions. Engelbrecht-Wiggans R, Shubik M, Stark R, eds. Auctions, Bidding, and Contracting: Uses and Theory (New York University Press, New York), 165–191.Google Scholar
• Weibull JW (1997) Evolutionary Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zeithammer R (2007) Strategic bid-shading and sequential auctioning with learning from past prices. Management Sci. 53(9):1510–1519.Link, Google Scholar