Voting Rules in Sequential Search by Committees: Theory and Experiments

References

• Abdelaziz FB, Krichen S (2007) Optimal stopping problems by two or more decision makers: A survey. Comput. Management Sci. 4(2):89–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agranov M, Potamites E, Schotter A, Tergiman C (2012) Beliefs and endogenous cognitive levels: An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 75(2):449–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albrecht J, Anderson A, Vroman S (2010) Search by committee. J. Econom. Theory 145(4):1386–1407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Rapoport A (2005) Operations research in experimental psychology. Smith JC, ed., TutORials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 213–236.Link, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Murphy RO, Rapoport A (2005) A multi-attribute extension of the secretary problem: Theory and experiments. J. Math. Psych. 49(5):410–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Rapoport A, Murphy RO (2006) Sequential observation and selection with rank-dependent payoffs: An experimental test of alternative decision rules. Management Sci. 52(9):1437–1449.Link, Google Scholar
• Black D (1958) Theory of Committees and Elections (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Braunstein YM, Schotter A (1982) Labor market search: An experimental study. Econom. Inquiry 20(1):133–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bröder A, Newell BR (2008) Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor. Judgment Decision Making 3(3):205–214.Google Scholar
• Brown M, Flinn CJ, Schotter A (2011) Real-time search in the laboratory and the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):948–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Sutter M (2012) Groups make better self-interested decisions. J. Econom. Perspect. 26(3):157–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chow YS, Moriguti S, Robbins H, Samuels M (1964) Optimal solution based on relative ranks (the “secretary problem”). Israel J. Math. 2(2):81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox J, Oaxaca RL (1989) Laboratory experiments with a finite-horizon job-search model. J. Risk Uncertainty 2(3):301–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson TS (1989) Who solved the secretary problem? Statist. Sci. 4(3):282–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman PR (1983) The secretary problem and its extensions: A review. Internat. Statist. Rev. 51(2):189–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Todd PM (1999) Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, the ABC Research Group, eds., Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (Oxford University Press, New York), 3–34.Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, Morgan P (1990) Search intensity in experiments. Econom. J. 100(401):478–486.Google Scholar
• Hizen Y, Kawata K, Sasaki M (2013) An experimental test of a committee search model. Eur. Econom. Rev. 61:59–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inukai K, Kawata K, Sasaki M (2017) Committee search with ex-ante heterogeneous agents: Theory and experimental evidence. Institute of Labor Economics Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 10670, Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Lindley DV (1961) Dynamic programming and decision theory. Appl. Statist. 10(1):39–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, McCall JJ (1976) The economics of job search: A survey. Econom. Inquiry 14(2):155–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2016). Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. NBER Working Paper No. 21875, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Mak V, Rapoport A, Seale DA (2014) Sequential search by committees with rank-dependent payoffs: An experimental study. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 124(2):256–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nurmi H (1987) Comparing Voting Systems (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palley AB, Kremer M (2014) Sequential search and learning from rank feedback: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci. 60(10):2525–2542.Link, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1988) Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. J. Experiment. Psychol.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 14(3):534–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson R, Shimer R, Wright R (2005) Search-theoretic models of the labor market: A survey. J. Econom. Literature. XLIII(4):959–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi M, Mazalov VV (2004) A non-zero-sum no-information best-choice game. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 60(3):437–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuels SM (1991) Secretary problems. Ghosh BK, Sen PK, eds., Handbook of Sequential Analysis (Marcel Dekker, New York), 381–405.Google Scholar
• Schotter A, Braunstein YM (1981) Economic search: An experimental study. Econom. Inquiry 19(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schunk D (2009) Behavioral heterogeneity in dynamic search situations: Theory and experimental evidence. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 33(9):1719–1738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schunk D, Winter J (2009) The relationship between risk attitudes and heuristics in search tasks: A laboratory experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 71(2):347–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale DA, Rapoport A (1997) Sequential decision making with relative ranks: An experimental investigation of the “secretary problem”. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 69(3):221–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale DA, Rapoport A (2000) Optimal stopping behavior with relative ranks: The secretary problem with unknown population size. J. Behav. Decision Making 13(4):391–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnemans J (1998) Strategies of search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 35(3):309–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein WE, Seale DA, Rapoport A (2003) Analysis of heuristic solutions to the best choice problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 151(1):140–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Czermak S, Feri F (2013) Strategic sophistication of individuals and teams. Experimental evidence. Eur. Econom. Rev. 64:395–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zwick R, Rapoport A, Lo AKC, Muthukrishnan AV (2003) Consumer sequential search: Not enough or too much? Marketing Sci. 22(4):503–519.Link, Google Scholar