The Effectiveness of Incentive Schemes in the Presence of Implicit Effort Costs

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3160

References

  • Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alder GS, Noel TW, Ambrose ML (2006) Clarifying the effects of internet monitoring on job attitudes: The mediating role of employee trust. Inform. Management 43(7):894–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • American Psychology Association (2019) APA dictionary of psychology. Accessed January 7, 2019, https://dictionary.apa.org/conscientiousness.Google Scholar
  • Araujo FA, Carbone E, Conell-Price L, Dunietz MW, Jaroszewicz A, Landsman R, Lamé D, Vesterlund L, Wang SW, Wilson AJ (2016) The slider task: An example of restricted inference on incentive effects. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 2(1):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D, Gneezy U, Loewenstein G, Mazar N (2009) Large stakes and big mistakes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(2):451–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arni P, Schiprowski A (2019) Job search requirements, effort provision and labor market outcomes. J. Public Econom. 169(January):65–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asch B (1990) Do incentives matter? The case of navy recruiters. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 43(3):89S–106S.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrick MR, Mount M (1991) The big 5 personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. 44(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bock O, Baetge I, Nicklisch A (2014) hroot: Hamburg registration and organization online tool. Eur. Econom. Rev. 71(October):117–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2016) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3085–3099.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer CF, Weber RA (2013) Experimental organizational economics. Gibbons R, Gibbons J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 213–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter J (2016) The labor supply of fixed-wage workers: Estimates from a real effort experiment. Eur. Econom. Rev. 89(October):85–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter J, Matthews PH, Schirm J (2010) Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):504–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Kuhn P (2011) Lab labor: What can labor economists learn from the lab? Card D, Ashenfelter O, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 229–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohn A, Fehr E, Goette L (2015) Fair wages and effort provision: Combining evidence from a choice experiment and a field experiment. Management Sci. 61(8):1777–1794.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corgnet B, Gómez-Miñambres J, Hernán-González R (2015a) Goal setting and monetary incentives: When large stakes are not enough. Management Sci. 61(12):2926–2944.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corgnet B, Hernán-González R, Mateo R (2015b) Cognitive reflection and the diligent worker: An experimental study of millennials. PLoS One 10(11):e0141243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corgnet B, Hernán-González R, McCarter MW (2015c) The role of the decision-making regime on cooperation in a workgroup social dilemma: An examination of cyberloafing. Games 6(4):588–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corgnet B, Hernán-González R, Schniter E (2015d) Why real leisure really matters: Incentive effects on real effort in the laboratory. Experiment. Econom. 18(2):284–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danilov A, Vogelsang T (2016) Time for helping. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 2(1):36–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci E, Ryan RM (1995) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Deci EL (1971) The effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 18(1):105–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci EL, Connell JP, Ryan RM (1989) Self-determination in a work organization. J. Appl. Psych. 74(4):580–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, Pope D (2018) What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(2):1029–1069.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickinson DL (1999) An experimental examination of labor supply and work intensities. J. Labor Econom. 17(4):638–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):556–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3):522–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckartz K (2014) Task enjoyment and opportunity costs in the lab: The effect of financial incentives on performance in real effort tasks. Jena Economic Research Papers No. 2014-005, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Erkal N, Gangadharan L, Koh BH (2018) Monetary and non-monetary incentives in real-effort tournaments. Eur. Econom. Rev. 101(January):528–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk A, Kosfeld M (2006) The hidden costs of control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1611–1630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(4):25–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gächter S, Huang L, Sefton M (2016) Combining “real effort” with induced effort costs: The ball-catching task. Experiment. Econom. 19(4):687–712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gill D, Prowse VL (2017) Using response times to measure strategic complexity and the value of thinking in games. Discussion Paper No. 10518, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Gill D, Prowse V, Vlassopoulos M (2013) Cheating in the workplace: An experimental study of the impact of bonuses and productivity. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 96(July):120–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Meier S, Rey-Biel P (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(4):191–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goerg S, Kube S (2012) Goals (th)at work, goals, monetary incentives, and workers’ performance. Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods No. 2012/19, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Goerg SJ, Kube S, Zultan R (2010) Treating equals unequally: Incentives in teams, workers’ motivation, and production technology. J. Labor Econom. 28(4):747–772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenfield R (2017) The rise and fall of working from home. Bloomberg (July 10), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-10/the-rise-and-fall-of-working-from-home.Google Scholar
  • Heckman JJ, Kautz T (2012) Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Econom. 19(4):451–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herbst D, Mas A (2015) Peer effects on worker output in the laboratory generalize to the field. Science 350(6260):545–549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herweg F, Müller D, Weinschenk P (2010) Binary payment schemes: Moral hazard and loss aversion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(5):2451–2477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and Linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7:24–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James HS (2005) Why did you do that? An economic examination of the effect of extrinsic compensation on intrinsic motivation and performance. J. Econom. Psych. 26(4):549–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kessler JB, Norton MI (2016) Tax aversion in labor supply. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 124(April):15–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiessling L, Radbruch J, Schaube S (2018) The impact of self-selection on performance. Discussion Paper No. 11365, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Koch AK, Nafziger J (2011) Self-regulation through goal setting. Scandinavian J. Econom. 113(1):212–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koch AK, Nafziger J (2016) Gift Exchange, control, and cyberloafing: A real-effort experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 131(1):212–227.Google Scholar
  • Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(3):86–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurzban R, Duckworth A, Kable JW, Myers J (2013) An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav. Brain Sci. 36(6):661–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larkin I (2014) The cost of high-powered incentives: Employee gaming in enterprise software sales. J. Labor Econom. 32(2):199–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP, Oyer P (2012) Personnel Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 479–519.Google Scholar
  • Mohnen A, Pokorny K, Sliwka D (2008) Transparency, inequity aversion, and the dynamics of peer pressure in teams: Theory and evidence. J. Labor Econom. 26(4):693–720.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murdock K (2002) Intrinsic motivation and optimal incentive contracts. RAND J. Econom. 33(4):650–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nalbantian HR, Schotter A (1997) Productivity under group incentives: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):314–341.Google Scholar
  • Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noussair C, Stoop J (2015) Time as a medium of reward in three social preference experiments. Experiment. Econom. 18(3):442–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ordóñez LD, Schweitzer ME, Galinsky AD, Bazerman MH (2009) Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Acad. Management Perspect. 23(1):6–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pokorny K (2008) Pay–but do not pay too much: An experimental study on the impact of incentives. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 66(2):251–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rammstedt B, John OP (2007) Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. J. Res. Personality 41(1):203–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J (2007) The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Rosaz J, Slonim R, Villeval MC (2016) Quitting and peer effects at work. Labour Econom. 39(April):55–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waber B, Magnolfi J, Lindsay G (2014) Workspaces that move people. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(10):68–77.Google Scholar
  • Wagner J, Watch D (2017) Innovation Spaces: The New Design of Work (Brookings Institute, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Winter E (2004) Incentives and discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):764–773.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.