Expertise and Discretionary Bonus Decisions

REFERENCES

• Abernethy MA, Wallis M (2019) Critique of the ‘manager effects’ research and implications for management accounting research. J. Management Accounting Res. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Keloharju M, Knüpfer S (2014) Match made at birth? What traits of a million Swedes tell us about CEOs. IFN Working paper, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (1994) Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):1125–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Guiso L, Prat A, Sadun R (2017) CEO behavior and firm performance. NBER Working Paper 23248, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(3):489–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1169–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J. (2011) Human resource management and productivity. David C, Orley A, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics (North Holland, Amsterdam), 1697–1767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Eifert B, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Roberts J (2013) Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bol JC (2011) The determinants and performance effects of managers’ performance evaluation biases. Accounting Rev. 86(5):1549–1575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bol JC, Smith SD (2011) Spillover effects in subjective performance evaluation: Bias and the asymmetric influence of controllability. Accounting Rev. 86(4):1213–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouwens JAN, Van Lent L (2007) Assessing the performance of business unit managers. J. Accounting Res. 45(4):667–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushman RM, Indjejikian RJ, Smith A (1995) Aggregate performance measures in business unit manager compensation: The role of intrafirm interdependencies. J. Accounting Res. 33(Supplement):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooke FL (2004) Public-sector pay in China: 1949–2001. Internat. J. Human Resource Management. 15(4–5):895–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demerjian P, Lev B, McVay S (2012) Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Sci. 58(7):1229–1248.Link, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2008) Pride and prejudice: The human side of incentive theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):990–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Kosfeld M (2006) The hidden costs of control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1611–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Henderson R (2012) Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1350–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Henderson R. (2013) What do managers do? Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 680–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Kaplan RS (2015) Formal measures in informal management: Can a balanced scorecard change a culture? Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):447–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittell JH (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.Link, Google Scholar
• Gittell JH, Seidner R, Wimbush J (2010) A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organ. Sci. 21(2):490–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Gittell JH, Fairfield KM, Bierbaum B, Head W, Jackson R, Kelly M, Laskin R, et al.. (2000) Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and length of stay: A nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Medical Care 38(8):807–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Harvey CR, Puri M (2013) Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. J. Financial Econom. 109(1):103–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, Henderson R (2014) Management practices, relational contracts, and the decline of General Motors. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(1):49–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1994) The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):972–991.Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
• Itoh H (1991) Incentives to help in multi-agent situations. Econometrica 59(3):611–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Klebanov MM, Sorensen M (2012) Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? J. Finance 67(3):973–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keating SA (1997) Determinants of divisional performance evaluation practices. J. Accounting Econom. 24(3):243–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knez M, Simester D (2001) Firm‐wide incentives and mutual monitoring at Continental Airlines. J. Labor Econom. 19(4):743–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin J (2003) Relational incentive contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):835–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu X, Mills A (2005) The effect of performance-related pay of hospital doctors on hospital behaviour: A case study from Shandong, China. Human Resources Health 3(11):1–12.Google Scholar
• Meindl JR (1989) Managing to be fair: An exploration of values, motives, and leadership. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(2):252–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1980) Structure in 5′s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Sci. 26(3):322–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Moers F (2005) Discretion and bias in performance evaluation: The impact of diversity and subjectivity. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 30(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pizzini M (2010) Group-based compensation in professional service firms: An empirical analysis of medical group practices. Accounting Rev. 85(1):343–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C, Topel R (1996) Favoritism in organizations. J. Political Econom. 104(5):958–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sliwka D (2007) Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):999–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tabellini G (2008) The scope of cooperation: Values and incentives. Quart. J.Econom. 123(3):905–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2000) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH).Google Scholar