Understanding the Social Learning Effect in Contagious Switching Behavior

References

• Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2007) Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica 78(2):1–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Benkard L, Levin J (2007) Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica 75:1331–1370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenton RA (2016) Corporate governance and nested authority: Cohesive network structure, actor-driven mechanisms, and the balance of power in American corporations. Amer. J. Sociol. 122:661–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Chen Y, Fang H (2009) Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):864–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 47(1):225–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T, Narasimhan C, Xie Y (2013) Treatment effectiveness and side effects: A model of physician learning. Management Sci. 59(6):1309–1325.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014a) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014b) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhar A, Larreguy H, Xandri JP (2012), Testing models of social learning on networks: Evidence from a framed field experiment. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Erdem T, Keane MP (2013) Invited Paper—Learning models: An assessment of progress, challenges, and new developments. Marketing Sci. 32(6):913–938.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Erdem T, Keane MP (2016) Empirical models of learning dynamics: A survey of recent developments. Rotman School of Management Working Paper No. 2810950, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Jiang R, Jin GZ (2009) Information, learning, and drug diffusion: The case of Cox-2 inhibitors. QME 7(4):399–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England J. Medicine 357(4):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford GS, Shum M (2005) Uncertainty and learning in pharmaceutical demand. Econometrica 73:1137–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta K, Singh R, Viswanathan B, Chakraborty D, Mukherjea S, Nanavati AA, Joshi A (2008) Social ties and their relevance to churn in mobile telecom networks. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Extending Database Tech.: Adv. Database Tech. (ACM, New York), 668–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeGroot MH (2005) Optimal Statistical Decisions, vol. 82 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dunne T, Klimek SD, Roberts MJ, Xu DY (2013) Entry, exit, and the determinants of market structure. RAND J. Econom. 44(3):462–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagle N, Pentland AS, Lazer D (2009) Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(36):15274–15278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T (1998) An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):339–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15:1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP, Sun B (2008) A dynamic model of brand choice when price and advertising signal product quality. Marketing Sci. 27(6):1111–1125.Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP, Öncü TS, Strebel J (2005) Learning about computers: An analysis of information search and technology choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(3):207–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Libai B, Muller E (2010) The chilling effects of network externalities. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 27(1):4–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A, Klenow P (2002) Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers. J. Law Econom. 45(2):317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotz VJ, Miller R (1993) Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60:265–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Israel M (2005) Services as experience goods: An empirical examination of consumer learning in automobile insurance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1444–1463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Ansari A, Gupta S (2007) A model of consumer learning for service quality and usage. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):529–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Lee JY (2015) Social contagion in new product trial and repeat. Marketing Sci. 34(3):408–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Katz M, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Keane MP, Wolpin KI (1997) The career decisions of young men. J. Political Econom. 105(3):473–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee L (2007) Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects. J. Econometrics 140(2):333–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemon K, White T, Winer R (2002) Dynamic customer relationship management: Incorporating future considerations into the service retention decision. J. Marketing 66(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Gonzalez M, Kaufman J (2012) Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(1):68–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma L, Krishnan R, Montgomery AL (2014) Latent homophily or social influence? An empirical analysis of purchase within a social network. Management Sci. 61(2):454–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N (2008) The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. 27(6):961–976.Link, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moretti E (2011) Social learning and peer effects in consumption: Evidence from movie sales. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):356–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair HS, Manchanda P, Bhatia T (2010) Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. 47(5):883–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayan V, Rao VR, Saunders C (2011) How peer influence affects attribute preferences: A Bayesian updating mechanism. Marketing Sci. 30(2):368–384.Link, Google Scholar
• Pakes A, McGuire P (1994) Computing Markov-perfect Nash equilibria: Numerical implications of a dynamic differentiated product model. RAND J. Econom. 25:555–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A, Ostrovsky M, Berry S (2007) Simple estimators for the parameters of discrete dynamic games (with entry/exit examples). RAND J. Econom. 38(2):373–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richter Y, EladYT, NoamS (2010) Predicting customer churn in mobile networks through analysis of social groups. Proc. 2018 SIAM Internat. Conf. Data Mining (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan SP, Tucker C (2012) Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(1):63–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TA (2001) The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociol. Methodology 31(1):361–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2008) Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. 54(12):2024–2038.Link, Google Scholar
• van Zalk M, Denissen J (2015) Idiosyncratic versus social consensus approaches to personality: Self-view, perceived, and peer-view similarity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 109:121–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Dodds PS (2007) Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. 34(4):441–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S, Allenby GM (2003) Modeling interdependent consumer preferences. J. Marketing Res. 40(3):282–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the US kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Yang S, Narayan V, Zhao Y (2013) Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews. Marketing Sci. 32(1):153–169.Link, Google Scholar