Manufacturers’ Competition and Cooperation in Sustainability: Stable Recycling Alliances
Published Online:1 Aug 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3178
References
- (2019) Extended producer responsibility and secondary markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2003) Market structure, scale economies and industry performance. CORE Discussion Paper No. 2003/65, Department of Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
- (2012) Extended producer responsibility for E-waste: Individual or collective producer responsibility? Production Oper. Management 21(6):1042–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) How collection cost structure drives a manufacturer’s reverse channel choice. Production Oper. Management 22(5):1089–1102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Efficient take-back legislation. Production Oper. Management 18(3):243–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1974) Cooperative games with coalition structures. Internat. J. Game Theory 3(4):217–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1964) The bargaining set for cooperative games. Adv. Game Theory 52:443–476.Google Scholar
- (1987) Coalition-proof nash equilibria. I. Concepts. J. Econom. Theory 42(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. 93(3):488–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) European recycling Platform (ERP): A Pan-European solution to WEEE compliance. Hester RE, Harrison RM, eds. Electronic Waste Management (RCS Publishing, Cambridge, UK), 161–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Farsighted coalitional stability. J. Econom. Theory 63(2):299–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) What gets recycled: An information theory based model for product recycling. Environ. Sci. Tech. 41(21):7543–7550.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Individual producer responsibility: A review of practical approaches to implementing individual producer responsibility for the WEEE directive. INSEAD Working Paper No. 2010/71/TOM/INSEAD Social Innovation Centre, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
- (2016) The effect of EPR on the markets for waste. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 241–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) A comparison of product take-back compliance schemes. Production Oper. Management 24(1):71–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Product take-back legislation and its impact on recycling and remanufacturing industries. Boone T, Jayaraman V, Ganeshan R, eds. Sustainable Supply Chains (Springer, New York), 129–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Reverse logistics network structures and design. Working paper, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
- (1959) Solutions to general non-zero-sum games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 4 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 47–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Formation of alliances in internet-based supply exchanges. Management Sci. 51(1):92–105.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Competition and cooperation in decentralized push and pull assembly systems. Management Sci. 54(4):733–747.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Efficient implementation of collective extended producer responsibility legislation. Management Sci. 62(4):1098–1123.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Mixing entropy and product recycling. Proc. 2005 IEEE Internat. Sympos. Electronics Environ. 2005 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 72–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Centralizing inventory in supply chains by using shapley value to allocate the profits. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):146–162.Link, Google Scholar
- Konishi H, Ray D (2003) Coalition formation as a dynamic process. J. Econom. Theory 110:1–41.Google Scholar
- (2013) Extended producer responsibility. J. Indust. Ecology 17(2):162–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Recycling and Extended Producer Responsibility: The European Experience (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Inventory games. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(1):127–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) A bargaining framework in supply chains: The assembly problem. Management Sci. 54(8):1482–1496.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Stable farsighted coalitions in competitive markets. Management Sci. 53(1):29–45.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Coalition stability in assembly models. Oper. Res. 57(1):131–145.Link, Google Scholar
- (1950) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36(1):48–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
- . (2006). Planning the funeral at the birth: Extended producer responsibility in the European Union and the United States. Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 30(51):51–98.Google Scholar
- (2004) Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Sci. 50(2):239–252.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Designing a sustainable recovery network for waste from electrical and electronic equipment using a genetic algorithm. Internat. J. Environ. Sustainable Development 16(1):60–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND J. Econom. 15(4):546–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Transshipment of inventories among retailers: Myopic vs. farsighted stability. Management Sci. 52(10):1493–1508.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Stability of information-sharing alliances in a three-level supply chain. Naval Res. Logist. 57(3):279–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Closed-loop supply chains: A critical review, and future research. Decision Sci. 44(1):7–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) EPR programmes: Individual versus collective responsibility—Exploring various forms of implementation and their implication to design change. IIIEE Report 8, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
- (2011). An analysis of monopolistic and competitive take-back schemes for WEEE recycling. Production Oper. Management 20(6):805–823.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 60 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
- Washington State Department of Ecology (2006) Implementing and financing an electronic product collection, recycling and reuse program for Washington state. Accessed November 27, 2018, https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/documents/0607005.pdf.Google Scholar

