A Matter of Perspective: How Failure Shapes Distributive Preferences

References

• Agranov M, Palfrey TR (2015) Equilibrium tax rates and income redistribution: A laboratory study. J. Public Econom. 130:45–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alesina A, Fuchs-Schündeln N (2007) Good-bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people’s preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1507–1528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alesina A, Giuliano P (2011) Preferences for redistribution. Benhabib J, Jackson MO, Bisin A, eds. Handbook of Social Economics, vol. 1A (North Holland, Amsterdam), 93–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2005) Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. J. Public Econom. 89(5–6):897–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almås I, Cappelen AW, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2010) Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science 328(5982):1176–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almås I, Cappelen, AW, Salvanes KG, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2016) Fairness and family background. Politics Philos. Econom. 16(2):117–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(4):596–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr A, Miller L, Ubeda P (2016) Moral consequences of becoming unemployed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(17):4676–4681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr A, Burns J, Miller L, Shaw I (2015) Economic status and acknowledgement of earned entitlement. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 118:55–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N (2017) Corporations in the age of inequality. Harvard Bus. Rev. (March 21), https://hbr.org/cover-story/2017/03/corporations-in-the-age-of-inequality.Google Scholar
• Bradley GW (1978) Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(1):56–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T (2016) The impact of losing in a competition on the willingness to seek further challenges. Management Sci. 62(12):3439–3449.Link, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2010). Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility. Eur. Econom. Rev. 54(3):429–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Hole AD, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2007) The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):818–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Konow J, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013a) Just luck: An experimental study of risk-taking and fairness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1398–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Moene KO, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2013b) Needs versus entitlements—An international fairness experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):574–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford S, Nelson KK, Rountree B (2018) Mind the gap: Ceo-employee pay ratios and shareholder say-on-pay votes. Working paper, University of Houston, Houston.Google Scholar
• Deffains B, Espinosa R, Thöni C (2016) Political self-serving bias and redistribution. J. Public Econom. 134:67–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durante R, Putterman L, van der Weele J (2014) Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: An experimental study. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):1059–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong C (2001) Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. J. Public Econom. 82(2):225–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frohlich N, Oppenheimer J, Kurki A (2004) Modeling other-regarding preferences and an experimental test. Public Choice 119(1–2):91–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giuliano P, Spilimbergo A (2014) Growing up in a recession. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(2):787–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goette L, Huffman D, Meier S, Sutter M (2012) Competition between organizational groups: Its impact on altruistic and antisocial motivations. Management Sci. 58(5):948–960.Link, Google Scholar
• Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2011) Sabotage in tournaments: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Management Sci. 57(4):611–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Kataria M, Montinari N (2012) Risk, entitlements and fairness bias: Explaining preferences for redistribution in multi-person setting. Jena Economic Research Paper No. 2012-061, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
• Kiatpongsan S, Norton MI (2014) How much (more) should CEOs make? A universal desire for more equal pay. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 9(6):587–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein AH, Schmutzler A (2017) Optimal effort incentives in dynamic tournaments. Games Econom. Behav. 103:199–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konow J (2000) Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1072–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuziemko I, Buell RW, Reich T, Norton MI (2014) “Last-place aversion”: Evidence and redistributive implications. Quart. J. Econom. 129(1):105–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuziemko I, Norton MI, Saez E, Stantcheva S (2015). How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(4):1478–1508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luttmer EFP, Singhal M (2011) Culture, context, and the taste for redistribution. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 3(1):157–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Ross M (1975) Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psych. Bull. 82(2):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möllerström J, Reme B-A, Sørensen EØ (2015) Luck, choice and responsibility: An experimental study of fairness views. J. Public Econom. 131:33–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller HM, Ouimet PP, Simintzi E (2017) Within-firm pay inequality. Rev. Financial Stud. 30(10):3605–3635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owens LA, Pedulla DS (2014) Material welfare and changing political preferences: The case of support for redistributive social policies. Soc. Forces 92(3):1087–1113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peysakhovich A, Rand DG (2016) Habits of virtue: Creating norms of cooperation and defection in the laboratory. Management Sci. 62(3):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Powdthavee N, Oswald AJ (2014) Does money make people right-wing and inegalitarian? A longitudinal study of lottery winners. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7934, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
• Rand DG, Pfeiffer T, Dreber A, Sheketoff RW, Wernerfelt NC, Benkler Y (2009) Dynamic remodeling of in-group bias during the 2008 Presidential election. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(15):6187–6191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Lara I, Moreno-Garrido L (2012) Self-interest and fairness: Self-serving choices of justice principles. Experiment. Econom. 15(1):158–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schurr A, Ritov I (2016) Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(7):1754–1759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tokumaru N (2016) Fairness ideals, hidden selfishness, and opportunistic behavior: An experimental approach. Social Preference, Institution, and Distribution: An Experimental and Philosophical Approach, Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol. 3 (Springer, Singapore), 21–46.Google Scholar
• Ubeda P (2014) The consistency of fairness rules: An experimental study. J. Econom. Psych. 41:88–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamagishi T, Mifune N (2008) Does shared group membership promote altruism? Fear, greed, and reputation. Rationality Soc. 20(1):5–30.Crossref, Google Scholar