How Do Sales Efforts Pay Off? Dynamic Panel Data Analysis in the Nerlove–Arrow Framework

References

• Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA, Yared P (2008) Income and democracy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):808–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahn SC, Schmidt P (1995) Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data. J. Econometrics 68(1):5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amemiya T, MaCurdy TE (1986) Instrumental-variable estimation of an error-components model. Econometrica 54(4):869–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1981) Estimation of dynamic models with error components. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 76(375):598–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1982) Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. J. Econometrics 18(1):47–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archak N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Sci. 57(8):1485–1509.Link, Google Scholar
• Arellano M (2003) Panel Data Econometrics (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balestra P, Nerlove M (1966) Pooling cross section and time series data in the estimation of a dynamic model: The demand for natural gas. Econometrica 34(3):585–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowsher CG (2002) On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Econom. Lett. 77(2):211–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breusch TS, Mizon GE, Schmidt P (1989) Efficient estimation using panel data. Econometrica 57(3):695–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Cagan P (1956) The Monetary dynamics of hyperinflation. Friedman M, ed. Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 25–117.Google Scholar
• Chung DJ (2017) How much is a win worth? An application to intercollegiate athletics. Management Sci. 63(2):548–565.Link, Google Scholar
• Clark CR, Doraszelski U, Draganska M (2009) The effect of advertising on brand awareness and perceived quality: An empirical investigation using panel data. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(2):207–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durlauf SN, Johnson PA, Temple JR (2005) Growth econometrics. Aghion P, Durlauf SN, eds. Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 555–677.Google Scholar
• Fang E, Lee J, Palmatier R, Han S (2016) If it takes a village to foster innovation, success depends on the neighbors: The effects of global and ego networks on new product launches. J. Marketing Res. 53(3):319–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng H, Morgan NA, Rego LL (2015) Marketing department power and firm performance. J. Marketing. 79(5):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman M (1957) A Theory of the Consumption Function (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Germann F, Ebbes P, Grewal R (2015) The chief marketing officer matters! J. Marketing. 79(3):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gönül FF, Carter F, Petrova E, Srinivasan K (2001) Promotion of prescription drugs and its impact on physicians’ choice behavior. J. Marketing 65(3):79–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatanaka M (1974) An efficient two-step estimator for the dynamic adjustment model with autoregressive errors. J. Econometrics 2(3):199–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, Taylor WE (1981) Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49(6):1377–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirunyawipada T, Xiong G (2018) Corporate environmental commitment and financial performance: Moderating effects of marketing and operations capabilities. J. Bus. Res. 86:22–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hujer R, Rodrigues PJ, Zeiss C (2005) Serial correlation in dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors and fixed effects. Working paper, J. W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Janakiraman R, Dutta S, Sismeiro C, Stern P (2008) Physicians’ persistence and its implications for their response to promotion of prescription drugs. Management Sci. 54(6):1080–1093.Link, Google Scholar
• Jung H (2005) A test for autocorrelation in dynamic panel data models. Working paper, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
• Koyck LM (1954) Distributed Lags and Investment Analysis (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Lee N, Moon HR, Zhou Q (2017) Many IVs estimation of dynamic panel regression models with measurement error. J. Econometrics 200(2):251–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Chintagunta PK (2004) Responsiveness of physician prescription behavior to salesforce effort: An individual level analysis. Marketing Lett. 15(2):129–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Rossi PE, Chintagunta PK (2004) Response modeling with nonrandom marketing-mix variables. J. Marketing Res. 41(4):467–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathys J, Burmester AB, Clement M (2016) What drives the market popularity of celebrities? A longitudinal analysis of consumer interest in film stars. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 33(2):428–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAlister L, Srinivasan R, Jindal N, Cannella AA (2016) Advertising effectiveness: The moderating effect of firm strategy. J. Marketing Res. 53(2):207–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizik N, Jacobson R (2004) Are physicians “easy marks”? Quantifying the effects of detailing and sampling on new prescriptions. Management Sci. 50(12):1704–1715.Link, Google Scholar
• Mukherji P, Sorescu A, Prabhu JC, Chandy RK (2011) Behemoths at the gate: How incumbents take on acquisitive entrants (and why some do better than others). J. Marketing 75(5):53–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan O, Rajiv S, Dutta S (2006) Absorptive capacity in high-technology markets: The competitive advantage of the haves. Marketing Sci. 25(5):510–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Narayan V, Kadiyali V (2015) Repeated interactions and improved outcomes: An empirical analysis of movie production in the United States. Management Sci. 62(2):591–607.Link, Google Scholar
• Nerlove M (1958) Distributed Lags and Demand Analysis for Agricultural and Other Commodities (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Nerlove M, Arrow KJ (1962) Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica 29(114):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumayer E (2004) The impact of political violence on tourism: Dynamic cross-national estimation. J. Conflict Resolution 48(2):259–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons LJ, Vanden Abeele P (1981) Analysis of sales call effectiveness. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):107–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paton D (2002) Advertising, quality and sales. Appl. Econom. 34(4):431–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rego LL, Morgan NA, Fornell C (2013) Reexamining the market share–customer satisfaction relationship. J. Marketing 77(5):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah D, Kumar V, Kim KH (2014) Managing customer profits: The power of habits. J. Marketing Res. 51(6):726–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song R, Meyer J, Ha K (2015) The relationship between product placement and the performance of movies. J. Advertising Res. 55(3):322–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20(4):518–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terris-Prestholt F, Windmeijer F (2016) How to sell a condom? The impact of demand creation tools on male and female condom sales in resource limited settings. J. Health Econom. 48:107–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuli KR, Bharadwaj SG, Kohli AK (2010) Ties that bind: The impact of multiple types of ties with a customer on sales growth and sales volatility. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):36–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Triest S, Bun MJ, van Raaij EM, Vernooij MJ (2009) The impact of customer-specific marketing expenses on customer retention and customer profitability. Marketing Lett. 20(2):125–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wall LL, Brown D (2007) The high cost of free lunch. Obstetrics Gynecology 110(1):169–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiong G, Bharadwaj S (2013) Asymmetric roles of advertising and marketing capability in financial returns to news: Turning bad into good and good into great. J. Marketing Res. 50(6):706–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye J, Dong B, Lee JY (2017) The long-term impact of service empathy and responsiveness on customer satisfaction and profitability: A longitudinal investigation in a healthcare context. Marketing Lett. 28(4):551–564.Crossref, Google Scholar