Inflated Reputations: Uncertainty, Leniency, and Moral Wiggle Room in Trader Feedback Systems

References

• Ambrus A, Greiner B (2012) Imperfect public monitoring with costly punishment: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3317–3332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Bernheim BD (2009) Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Rao JM (2011) The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. J. Public Econom. 95(7–8):513–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ba S, Pavlou PA (2002) Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. 26(3):243–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hortacsu A (2003) The winner’s curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):329–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hortaçsu A (2004) Economic insights from internet auctions. J. Econom. Literature 42(2):457–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Isaac H, Tadelis S (2008) Seller reputation. Foundations Trends Microeconom. 4(4):273–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauerly RJ (2009) Online auction fraud and eBay. Marketing Management J. 19(1):133–143.Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2011) Identity, morals, and taboos: Beliefs as assets. Quart. J. Econom. 126(2):805–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bereby-Meyer Y, Roth AE (2006) The speed of learning in noisy games: Partial reinforcement and the sustainability of cooperation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1029–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigelow J (1904) The Works of Benjamin Franklin in Twelve Volumes, vol. 11 (G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Huck S (2004) Repetition and reputation: Implications for trust and trustworthiness when institutions change. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):362–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bol JC (2011) The determinants and performance effects of managers’ performance evaluation biases. Accounting Rev. 86(5):1549–1575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Figueras N (2003) An exploration of reputation formation in experimental games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 50(1):89–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bretz RD Jr, Milkovich GT, Read W (1992) The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. J. Management 18(2):321–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Wang JT-Y (2006) Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games. Games Econom. Behav. 56(1):7–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on MovieLens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleves MA (2002) From the help desk: Comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves from two or more probit or logit models. Stata J. 2(3):301–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P, Fréchette GR (2018) On the determinants of cooperation in infinitely repeated games: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 56(1):60–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Cain DM, Dawes RM (2006) What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 100(2):193–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Weber R, Kuang J (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Haan T, Offerman T, Sloof R (2015) Money talks? An experimental investigation of cheap talk and burned money. Internat. Econom. Rev. 56(4):1385–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2001) Analyzing the economic efficiency of eBay-like online reputation reporting mechanisms. Proc. 3rd ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 171–179.Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2005) Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):209–230.Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Wood CA (2008) The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Sci. 54(3):460–476.Link, Google Scholar
• Dickson ES, Gordon SC, Huber GA (2009) Enforcement and compliance in an uncertain world: An experimental investigation. J. Politics 71(4):1357–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dulleck BU, Kerschbamer R, Sutter M (2011) The economics of credence goods: An experiment on the role of liability, verifiability, reputation, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):530–559.Google Scholar
• Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Laboratory experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filipas A, Horton JJ, Golden J.M (2018) Reputation in the long-run. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganzach Y, Krantz DH (1991) The psychology of moderate prediction: II. Leniency and uncertainty. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 48(2):169–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giebe T, Gürtler O (2012) Optimal contracts for lenient supervisors. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81(2):403–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golman R, Bhatia S (2012) Performance evaluation inflation and compression. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 37(8):534–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregg DG, Scott JE (2006) The role of reputation systems in reducing on-line auction fraud. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 10(3):95–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greif A (1993) Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(3):525–548.Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econom. Sci. Assoc. 1(1):114–125.Google Scholar
• Grosskopf B, Sarin R (2010) Is reputation good or bad? An experiment. Amer. Economic Rev. 100(5):2187–2204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grund C, Przemeck J (2012) Subjective performance appraisal and inequality aversion. Appl. Econom. 44(17):2149–2155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Güth W, Huck S, Ockenfels P (1996) Two-level ultimatum bargaining with incomplete information: An experimental study. Econom. J. 106(436):593–604.Google Scholar
• Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith VL (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):653–660.Google Scholar
• Houser D, Wooders J (2006) Reputation in auctions: Theory, and evidence from eBay. J. Econom. Management Strategy 15(2):353–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu N, Pavlou PA, Zhang J (2006) Can online reviews reveal a product’s true quality? Empirical findings and analytical modeling of online word-of-mouth communication. Feigenbaum J, Chuang DP, eds. Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM Press, New York), 324–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu N, Pavlou PA, Zhang J (2009) Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews. Comm. ACM 52(10):144–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jawahar IM, Williams CR (1997) Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psych. 50(4):905–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Kato A (2006) Price, quality, and reputation: Evidence from an online field experiment. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):983–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman R, Wood C (2006) Doing their bidding: An empirical examination of factors that affect a buyer’s utility in internet auctions. Inform. Tech. Management 7(3):171–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein TJ, Lambertz C, Spagnolo G, Stahl KO (2009) The actual structure of eBay’s feedback mechanism and early evidence on the effects of recent changes. Internat. J. Electronic Bus. 7(3):301–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein TJ, Lambertz C, Stahl KO (2016) Market transparency, adverse selection, and moral hazard. J. Political Econom. 124(6):1677–1713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM, Wilson R (1982) Reputation and imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory 27(2):253–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lafky J (2014) Why do people rate? Theory and evidence on online ratings. Games Econom. Behav. 87(September):554–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landy FJ, Farr JL (1980) Performance rating. Psych. Bull. 87(1):72–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR (1986) Supervisors’ performance feedback to subordinates: The impact of subordinate performance valence and outcome dependence. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(3):391–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Schmidt K (2017) You owe me. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(2):493–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, te Velde VL, Weber R (2014) Rethinking reciprocity. Annual Rev. Econom. 6:849–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchegiani L, Reggiani T, Rizzolli M (2016) Loss averse agents and lenient supervisors in performance appraisal. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 131(Part A):183–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markussen T, Putterman L, Tyran J-R (2016) Judicial error and cooperation. Eur. Econom. Rev. 89(October):372–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, North DC, Weingast BR (1990) The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the Champagne fairs. Econom. Politics 2(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mimra W, Rasch A, Waibel C (2016) Price competition and reputation in credence goods markets: Experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. 100(November):337–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitzkewitz M, Nagel R (1993) Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information. Internat. J. Game Theory 22(2):171–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moers F (2005) Discretion and bias in performance evaluation: The impact of diversity and subjectivity. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 30(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nikiforakis N (2008) Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves? J. Public Econom. 92(1–2):91–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nikiforakis N (2010) Feedback, punishment and cooperation in public good experiments. Games Econom. Behav. 68(2):689–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) The limits of reputation in platform markets: An empirical analysis and field experiment. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Selten R (2014) Impulse balance in the newsvendor game. Games Econom. Behav. 86(July):237–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Werner P (2012) “Hiding behind a small cake” in a newspaper dictator game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 82(1):82–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C, Topel R (1993) Discretion and bias in performance evaluation. Eur. Econom. Rev. 37(2–3):355–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proserpio D, Zervas G (2017) Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Sci. 36(5):645–665.Link, Google Scholar
• Reichling F (2004) Effects of reputation mechanisms on fraud prevention in eBay auction. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Resnick P, Zeckhauser R (2002) Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. Baye MR, ed. The Economics of the Internet and e-Commerce, Advances in Applied Microeconomics, vol. 11 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 127–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J, Lockwood K (2006) The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experiment. Econom. 9(2):79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice SC (2012) Reputation and uncertainty in online markets: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):436–452.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2002) The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70(4):1341–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saal FE, Downey RG, Lahey MA (1980) Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data. Psych. Bull. 88(2):413–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saeedi M, Shen Z, Sundaresan N (2013) The value of feedback: An analysis of reputation system. Working paper, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
• Samak AC (2013) An experimental study of reputation with heterogeneous goods. Decision Support Systems 54(2):1134–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharon AT, Bartlett CJ (1969) Effect of instructional conditions in producing leniency on two types of rating scales. Personnel Psych. 22(3):251–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tadelis S (2011) The power of shame and the rationality of trust. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Tadelis S (2016) Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Annual Rev. Econom. 8:321–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor K, Wherry RJ (1951) A study of leniency in two rating systems. Personnel Psych. 4(1):39–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volokh A (1997) n Guilty men. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 146(2):173–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waung M, Highhouse S (1997) Fear of conflict and empathic buffering: Two explanations for the inflation of performance feedback. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 71(1):37–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson R (1985) Reputations in games and markets. Roth AE, ed. Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 27–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers J (2015) A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar