Oversight and Efficiency in Public Projects: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis

References

• Abadie A, Imbens GW (2011) Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajaj A, Kekre S, Srinivasan K (2004) Managing NPD: Cost and schedule performance in design and manufacturing. Management Sci. 50(4):527–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Tadelis S (2001) Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. 32(3):387–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakshi N, Kim S-H, Savva N (2015) Signaling new product reliability with after-sales service contracts. Management Sci. 61(8):1812–1829.Link, Google Scholar
• Banfield EC (1975) Corruption as a feature of governmental organization. J. Law Econom. 18(3):585–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett VM, Pierce L, Snyder JA, Toffel MW (2013) Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Sci. 59(8):1725–1742.Link, Google Scholar
• Board S (2007) Bidding into the red: A model of post-auction bankruptcy. J. Finance 62(6):2695–2723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordat C, McCullouch BG, Labi S, Sinha KC (2004) An analysis of cost overruns and time delays of INDOT projects. Publication no. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2004/7, SPR-2811, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bozeman B (1993) A theory of government “red tape.” J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 3(3):273–303.Google Scholar
• Bradley ME, Clark MG (1972) Supervision and efficiency in socialized agriculture. Soviet Stud. 23(3):465–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Porter E, Norton MI (2016) Surfacing the submerged state: Operational transparency increases trust in and engagement with government. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Calonico S, Cattaneo M, Titiunik R (2015) Optimal data-driven regression discontinuity plots. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 110(512):1753–1769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TH, de Véricourt F, Besbes O (2019) Contracting in medical equipment maintenance services: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 65(3):1136–1150.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Lee H (2016) Incentive alignment and coordination in project supply chains. Management Sci. 63(4):1011–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Coviello D, Mariniello M (2014) Publicity requirements in public procurement: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. J. Public Econom. 109:76–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coviello D, Guglielmo A, Spagnolo G (2017) The effect of discretion on procurement performance. Management Sci. 64(2):715–738.Link, Google Scholar
• D’Alpaos C, Vergalli S (2014) Time overruns in public procurement and concession contracts: Penalty fee and option value to delay. Rev. Environment Energy Econom. (Re3):RePEc:fem:femre3:2014.03-02.Google Scholar
• Deshpande V, Cohen MA, Donohue K (2003) An empirical study of service differentiation for weapon system service parts. Oper. Res. 51(4):518–530.Link, Google Scholar
• Drelicharz JA (1994) Highlights of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994—Lowering government's cost of doing business. Program Manager XXIII(6):12–16.Google Scholar
• Gerard F, Rokkanen M, Rothe C (2016) Bounds on treatment effects in regression discontinuity designs under manipulation of the running variable. NBER Working Paper No. 22892, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Goh J, Hall NG (2013) Total cost control in project management via satisficing. Management Sci. 59(6):1354–1372.Link, Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Sivaramakrishnan K (2008) On vendor preferences for contract types in offshore software development: The case of fixed price vs. time and materials contracts. Inform. Systems Res. 19(2):202–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Guajardo JA, Cohen MA, Kim S-H, Netessine S (2012) Impact of performance-based contracting on product reliability: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 58(5):961–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Porteus EL (1995) Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Sci. 41(9):1431–1447.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahn J, Todd P, Van der Klaauw W (2001) Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica 69(1):201–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1999) Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(1):169–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens G, Kalyanaraman K (2012) Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(3):933–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacob R, Zhu P, Somers MA, Bloom H (2012) A practical guide to regression discontinuity. Technical report, MDRC, New York.Google Scholar
• Jain N, Hasija S, Popescu DG (2013) Optimal contracts for outsourcing of repair and restoration services. Oper. Res. 61(6):1295–1311.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Chen K-Y, Erhun F (2011) Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information: An experimental evaluation. Management Sci. 57(4):689–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellogg R (2011) Learning by drilling: Interfirm learning and relationship persistence in the Texas oilpatch. Quart. J. Econom. 126(4):1961–2004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelman S (2002) Remaking federal procurement. Public Contract Law J. 31(4):581–622.Google Scholar
• Kim S-H (2015) Time to come clean? Disclosure and inspection policies for green production. Oper. Res. 63(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim S-H, Cohen MA, Netessine S (2007) Performance contracting in after-sales service supply chains. Management Sci. 53(12):1843–1858.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Ulrich KT (2001) Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. 47(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee DS (2008) Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. house elections. J. Econom. 142(2):675–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Lemieux T (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econom. Literature 48(2):281–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linden A, Adams JL (2012) Combining the regression discontinuity design and propensity score-based weighting to improve causal inference in program evaluation. J. Evaluation Clinical Practice 18(2):317–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lodi A, Malaguti E, Stier-Moses NE, Bonino T (2016) Design and control of public-service contracts and an application to public transportation systems. Management Sci. 62(4):1165–1187.Link, Google Scholar
• McCrary J (2008) Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. J. Econometrics 142(2):698–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier SR (2010) Causal inferences on the cost overruns and schedule delays of large-scale U.S. federal defense and intelligence acquisition programs. Project Management J. 41(1):28–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Might RJ, Fischer WA (1985) The role of structural factors in determining project management success. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 32(2):71–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oi WY (1983) Heterogeneous firms and the organization of production. Econom. Inquiry 21(2):147–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roels G, Karmarkar US, Carr S (2010) Contracting for collaborative services. Management Sci. 56(5):849–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Schooner SL (2001) Fear of oversight: The fundamental failure of businesslike government. Amer. Univ. Law Rev. 50(3):627–723.Google Scholar
• Serpa JC, Krishnan H (2018) The impact of supply chains on firm-level productivity. Management Sci. 64(2):511–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Shen Y (2003) Selection incentives in a performance-based contracting system. Health Services Res. 38(2):535–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smirnoff JP, Hicks MJ (2008) The impact of economic factors and acquisition reforms on the cost of defense weapon systems. Rev. Financial Econom. 17(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith R (2015) Keeping it simple (sometimes): Acquisition thresholds are changing (or not). Centre Law & Consulting. Accessed December 19, 2018, http://dev.centrelawgroup.com/keeping-it-simple-sometimes-acquisition-thresholds-are-changing-or-not/.Google Scholar
• Spiller PT (2008) An institutional theory of public contracts: Regulatory implications. NBER Working Paper No. 14152, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• USAspending.gov (2017) USAspending.gov database download. Accessed January 4, 2017, https://files.usaspending.gov/database_download/.Google Scholar
• Waehrer K (1995) A model of auction contracts with liquidated damages. J. Econom. Theory 67(2):531–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng C (2001) High bids and broke winners. J. Econom. Theory 100(1):129–171.Crossref, Google Scholar