One Step at a Time: Does Gradualism Build Coordination?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3210

References

  • Abbott KW, Snidal D (2002) Filling in the folk theorem: The role of gradualism and legalization in international cooperation to combat corruption. Presentation, American Political Science Association Meeting, August 29–September 1, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Andreoni J, Samuelson L (2006) Building rational cooperation. J. Econom. Theory 127(1):117–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armendáriz B, Morduch J (2010) The Economics of Microfinance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1974) The Limits of Organization (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Battalio R, Samuelson L, Van Huyck J (2001) Optimization Incentives and coordination failure in laboratory stag hunt games. Econometrica 69(3):749–764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benyon J (1994) Policing the European Union: The changing basis of cooperation on law enforcement. Internat. Affairs 70(3):497–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berninghaus SK, Ehrhart KM (2001) Coordination and information: Recent experimental evidence. Econom. Lett. 73(3):345–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bohnet I, Huck S (2004) Repetition and reputation: Implications for trust and trustworthiness when institutions change. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):362–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton GE, Feldhaus C, Ockenfels A (2016) Social interaction promotes risk taking in a stag hunt game. German Econom. Rev. 17(3):409–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bornstein G, Gneezy U, Nagel R (2002) The effect of intergroup competition on group coordination: An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 41(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandts J, Cooper DJ (2006a) Observability and overcoming coordination failure in organizations. Experiment. Econom. 9(4):407–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandts J, Cooper DJ (2006b) A change would do you good. An experimental study on how to overcome coordination failure in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):669–693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Camerer CF (1996) Loss-avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 111(1):165–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Ho TH (1998) Experience-weighted attraction learning in coordination games: Probability rules, heterogeneity, and time-variation. J. Math. Psych. 42(2):305–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Ho TH (1999) Experience weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67(4):827–874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cason TN, Savikhin AC, Sheremeta RM (2012) Behavioral spillovers in coordination games. Eur. Econom. Rev. 56(2):233–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G (2000) Self-serving cheap talk: A test of Aumann’s conjecture. Games Econom. Behav. 33(2):177–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen R, Chen Y (2011) The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2562–2589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Li SX, Liu TX, Shih M (2014) Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games Econom. Behav. 84:58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi S, Gale D, Kariv S (2008) Sequential equilibrium in monotone games: A theory-based analysis of experimental data. J. Econom. Theory 143(1):302–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R, DeJong DV, Forsythe R, Ross TW (1992) Communication in coordination games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):739–771.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Costa-Gomes MA, Crawford VP (2006) Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1737–1768.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Costa-Gomes MA, Crawford VP, Broseta B (2001) Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica 69(5):1193–1235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Costa-Gomes MA, Crawford VP, Iriberri N (2009) Comparing models of strategic thinking in Van Huyck, Battalio, and Beil’s coordination games. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2–3):365–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford VP (1995) Adaptive dynamics in coordination games. Econometrica 63(1):103–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devetag G (2003) Coordination and information in critical mass games: An experimental study. Experiment. Econom. 6(1):53–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devetag G (2005) Precedent transfer in coordination games: An experiment. Econom. Lett. 89(2):227–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devetag G, Ortmann A (2007) When and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratory. Experiment. Econom. 10(3):331–344.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorsey R (1992) The voluntary contributions mechanism with real time revisions. Public Choice 73(3):261–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duffy J, Feltovich N (2002) Do actions speak louder than words? Observation vs. cheap talk as coordination devices. Games Econom. Behav. 39(1):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duffy J, Feltovich N (2006) Words, deeds, and lies: Strategic behavior in games with multiple signals. Rev. Econom. Stud. 73(3):669–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duffy J, Ochs J, Vesterlund L (2007) Giving little by little: Dynamic voluntary contribution games. J. Public Econom. 91(9):1708–1730.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feri F, Irlenbusch B, Sutter M (2010) Efficiency gains from team-based coordination—Large-scale experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1892–1912.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U (2007) z–Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready–made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Levine D (1998) Theory of Learning in Games (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Gächter S, Renner E (2010) The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public goods experiments. Experiment. Econom. 13(3):364–377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gale D (1995) Dynamic coordination games. Econom. Theory 5(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gale D (2001) Monotone games with positive spillovers. Games Econom. Behav. 37(2):295–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree JK, Holt CA (2005) An experimental study of costly coordination. Games Econom. Behav. 51(2):349–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR (2009) Why teams don’t work. Interview by Diane Coutu. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(5):98–105, 130.Google Scholar
  • Heinze G, Schemper M (2002) A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statist. Medicine 21:2409–2419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho TH, Camerer C, Weigelt K (1998) Iterated dominance and iterated best response in experimental “p-beauty contests.” Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(4):947–969.Google Scholar
  • Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knez M, Camerer CF (1994) Creating expectational assets in the laboratory: Coordination in weakest-link games. Strategic Management J. 15(8):101–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurzban R, McCabe K, Smith VL, Wilson B (2001) Incremental commitment and reciprocity in a real-time public goods game. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 27(12):1662–1673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langlois CC, Langlois JPP (2001) Engineering cooperation: A game theoretic analysis of phased international agreements. Amer. J. Political Sci. 45(3):599–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine DK, Zheng J (2015) The relationship between economic theory and experiments. Frechette G, Schotter A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economic Methodology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 43–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lockwood B, Thomas JP (2002) Gradualism and irreversibility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(2):339–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounamaa PH, March GJ (1987) Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. 33(1):107–123.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marx L, Matthews S (2000) A dynamic voluntary contribution to a pubic project. Rev. Econom. Stud. 67(2):327–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagel R (1995) Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1313–1326.Google Scholar
  • Offerman T, van der Veen A (2015) How to subsidize contributions to public goods: Does the frog jump out of the boiling water? Eur. Econom. Rev. 74:96–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):463–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oprea R, Charness G, Friedman D (2014) Continuous time and communication in a public-goods experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 108:212–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prusak L (2011) Building a collaborative enterprise. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(7–8):94–101.Google Scholar
  • Rico R, Sánchez-Manzanares M, Gil F, Gibson C (2008) Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):163–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riechmann T, Weimann J (2008) Competition as a coordination device: Experimental evidence from a minimum effort coordination game. Eur. J. Political Econom. 24(2):437–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riedl A, Rohde I, Strobel M (2016) Efficient coordination in weakest-link games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):737–767.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Romero J (2015) The effect of hysteresis on equilibrium selection in coordination games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 111:88–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE, Erev I (1995) Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games Econom. Behav. 8(1):164–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rutström EE, Wilcox NT (2009) Stated beliefs vs. inferred beliefs: A methodological inquiry and experimental test. Games Econom. Behav. 67(2):616–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salmon TC, Weber RA (2017) Maintaining efficiency while integrating entrants from lower performing groups: an experimental study. Econom. J. 127(600):417–444.Google Scholar
  • Smith KG, Carroll SJ, Ashford SJ (1995) Intra-and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Acad. Management J. 38(1):7–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Siemsen E, Balasubramanian S, Roth AV (2007) Incentives that induce task-related effort, helping, and knowledge sharing in workgroups. Management Sci. 53(10):1533–1550.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stahl DO, Wilson PW (1995) On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):218–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van De Ven A, Delbecq A, Koenig R (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2):322–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson J (1999) Starting small and renegotiation. J. Econom. Theory 85(1):52–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):234–248.Google Scholar
  • Watson J (2002) Starting small and commitment. Games Econom. Behav. 38(1):176–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber RA, Camerer C, Rottenstreich Y, Knez M (2001) The illusion of leadership: Misattribution of cause in coordination games. Organ. Sci. 12(5):582–598.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber RA (2005) Managing growth to achieve efficient coordination: Theory and experimental evidence. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  • Weber RA (2006) Managing growth to achieve efficient coordination in large groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):114–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang C, Xu M, Meng J, Tang F (2017) Efficient large-size coordination via voluntary group formation: An experiment. Internat. Econom. Rev. 58(2):651–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang C, Zhang B, Charness G, Cong L, Lien JW (2018) Endogenous rewards promote cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(40):9968–9973.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou L, Su F (2011) Strategies and case study of venture capital investment. IEEE 2011 Internat. Conf. Management Service Sci. (IEEE, New York), 1–4.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.