Economically Motivated Adulteration in Farming Supply Chains

References

• Antle J (1987) Econometric estimation of producers’ risk attitudes. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 69(3):509–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atasu A, ed. (2016) Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babich V (2010) Independence of capacity ordering and financial subsidies to risky suppliers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(4):583–607.Link, Google Scholar
• Babich V, Tang C (2012) Managing opportunistic supplier product adulteration: Deferred payments, inspection, and combined mechanisms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):301–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Bennett A, Dugdill B, Lambert JC, Thapa T (2001) Report of the FAO e-mail Conference on Small-Scale Milk Collection and Processing in Developing Countries (Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome).Google Scholar
• Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo JC, Tan T, eds. (2017) Sustainable Supply Chains: A Research-Based Textbook on Operations and Strategy (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caro F, Chintapalli P, Rajaram K, Tang C (2018) Improving supplier compliance through joint and shared audits with collective penalty. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(2):363–380.Link, Google Scholar
• CCTV (2012) Report on “instant chickens”: Grow 5 pounds in 40 days with illegal drugs, (in Chinese). Accessed December 18, 2017, http://finance.sina.com.cn/nongye/hyxx/20121218/112114038687.shtml.Google Scholar
• CFDA (2018) Implementation details on food safety supervision and food sampling. China Food and Drug Administration, notice no. 14. Accessed May 30, 2018, http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-_01/24/content_5260165.htm.Google Scholar
• Che YK (1993) Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. 24(4):668–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C, Zhang J, Delaurentis T (2014) Quality control in food supply chain management: An analytical model and case study of the adulterated milk incident in China. Internat. J. Production Econom. 152(C):188–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Lee H (2017) Sourcing under supplier responsibility risk: The effects of certification, audit, and contingency payment. Management Sci. 63(9):2795–2812.Link, Google Scholar
• Chintapalli P, Tang C (2017) The impact of crop minimum support prices on crop selection and farmer welfare in the presence of strategic farmers. Working paper, UCLA Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho SH, Fang X, Tayur S (2015) Combating strategic counterfeiters in licit and illicit supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(3):273–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho SH, Fang X, Tayur SR, Xu Y (2019) Combating child labor: Incentives and information disclosure in global supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Clemens J, Inderfurth K (2015) Supply chain coordination by contracts under binomial production yield. Bus. Res. 8(2):301–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dada M, Petruzzi NC, Schwarz LB (2007) A newsvendor’s procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(1):9–32.Link, Google Scholar
• Deshmukh N (2011) State to review milk pricing method to check adulteration. Times of India. Accessed May 30, 2018, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/State-_to-_review-_milk-_pricing-_method-_to-_check-_adulteration/articleshow/7323847.cms.Google Scholar
• Doyle MP, Loneragan GH, Scott HM, Singer RS (2013) Antimicrobial resistance: Challenges and perspectives. Comprehensive Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety 12(2):234–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Draaijer J (2002) Milk collection, processing and marketing. Milk Producer Group Resource Book (FAO, Rome), 31–50.Google Scholar
• Everstine K, Spink J, Kennedy S (2013) Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of food: Common characteristics of EMA incidents. J. Food Protection 76(4):723–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang X, Cho SH (2019) Cooperative approaches to managing social responsibility in a market with externalities. Working paper, Singapore Management University, Singapore.Google Scholar
• FAO (2009) Milk testing and quality control. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO/TCP/KEN/6611 Project. Accessed May 30, 2018, http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/resources/documents/MPGuide/mpguide2.htm.Google Scholar
• FAO (2017) Maximum residue limits (MRLs) and risk management recommendations (RMRs) for residues of veterinary drugs in foods. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization, CAC/MRL 2-2017. Accessed May 30, 2018, http://www.fao.org/fao-_who-_codexalimentarius/sh-_proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCAC%2BMRL%2B2%252FMRL2e.pdf.Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Yang N (2008) Selecting a portfolio of suppliers under demand and supply risks. Oper. Res. 56(4):916–936.Link, Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Lall U, Şimşek AS (2019) Supply chain analysis of contract farming. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):361–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Flynn BB, Zhao X (2014) Global Supply Chain Quality Management: Product Recalls and Their Impact (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gadzikwa L, Lyne M, Hendriks S (2007) Horizontal coordination and free-riding in a group of certified organic crop growers: An empirical study of the Ezemvelo Farmers’ organization in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. African J. Agricultural Res. Econom. 1(2):129–144.Google Scholar
• Gale F, Arnade C (2015) Effects of rising feed and labor costs on China’s chicken price. Internat. Food Agribusiness Management Rev. 18(A):137–150.Google Scholar
• Gale F, Hu D (2009) Supply chain issues in China’s milk adulteration incident. 27th Conf. Internat. Assoc. Agricultural Economists (International Association of Agricultural Economists, Milwaukee).Google Scholar
• Golosov M, Lorenzoni G, Tsyvinski A (2014) Decentralized trading with private information. Econometrica 82(3):1055–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Handford CE, Campbell K, Elliott CT (2016) Impacts of milk fraud on food safety and nutrition with special emphasis on developing countries. Comprehensive Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety 15(1):130–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu M, Liu Y, Wang W (2019) Socially beneficial rationality: The value of strategic farmers, social entrepreneurs, and for-profit firms in crop planting decisions. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang L, Song JS, Swinney R (2017a) Managing social responsibility in multitier supply chains. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Levi R, Springs S, Wang S, Zheng Y (2017b) Risk drivers for economically motivated food adulteration in China’s farming supply chains. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Inouye A (2017) China: Poultry and products semi-annual. GAIN report no. CH17005, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Beijing.Google Scholar
• Johnson R (2014) Food fraud and “economically motivated adulteration” of food and food ingredients. Technical report, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC. Available at https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43358.pdf.Google Scholar
• Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4):546–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Letizia P, Hendrikse G (2016) Supply chain structure incentives for corporate social responsibility: An incomplete contracting analysis. Production Oper. Management 25(11):1919–1941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meena PL, Sarmah SP, Sarkar A (2011) Sourcing decisions under risks of catastrophic event disruptions. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 47(6):1058–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mu L, Dawande M, Mookerjee V (2014) Improving the milk supply chain in developing countries: Analysis, insights, and recommendations. Production Oper. Management 23(7):1098–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mu L, Dawande M, Geng X, Mookerjee V (2016) Milking the quality test: Improving the milk supply chain under competing collection intermediaries. Management Sci. 62(5):1259–1277.Link, Google Scholar
• Mungroo N, Neethirajan S (2014) Biosensors for the detection of antibiotics in poultry industry—A review. Biosensors 4(4):472–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Li D (2016) Competing on Supply Chain Quality, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 2 (Springer International Publishing, Basel, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narrod C, Tiongco M, Costales A (2008) Global poultry sector trends and external drivers for structural change. Proc. Internat. Poultry Conf. Poultry 21st Century: Avian Influenza Beyond (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Bangkok, Thailand), 1–28.Google Scholar
• Orsdemir A, Hu B, Deshpande V (2019) Ensuring corporate social and environmental responsibility through vertical integration and horizontal sourcing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(2):417–434.Link, Google Scholar
• Pi C, Rou Z, Horowitz S (2014) Fair or fowl? Industrialization of poultry production in China. Technical report, Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Pikkemaat M (2009) Microbial screening methods for detection of antibiotic residues in slaughter animals. Anal. Bioanalytical Chemistry 395(4):893–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2016) Supplier evasion of a buyer’s audit: Implications for motivating supplier social and environmental responsibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(2):184–197.Link, Google Scholar
• PRC-MIIT (2011) Notice of maximum residue limit of melamine in food products (in Chinese). Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China, notice no. 10. Accessed May 30, 2018, http://www.miit.gov.cn/n1146295/n1652858/n1652930/n4509607/c4513875/content.html.Google Scholar
• PRC-NPC (2015) Food safety law of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese). The National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. Accessed May 30, 2018, http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/cwhhy/12jcwh/2015-_04/25/content_1934591.htm.Google Scholar
• Ross SM (2005) Introductory Statistics (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Rou Z (2014) China’s dairy dilemma. Technical report, Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Sheffi Y (2005) The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simchi-Levi D, Schmidt W, Wei Y (2014) From superstorms to factory fires: Managing unpredictable supply chain disruptions. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(1/2):96–101.Google Scholar
• Stirzaker D (1999) Probability and Random Variables: A Beginner’s Guide (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanzina A, Shoeb A (2016) Common milk adulteration and their detection techniques. Internat. J. Food Contamination 3(1):22–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B (2009) Disruption-management strategies for short life-cycle products. Naval Res. Logist. 56(4):318–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem J (2007) Risk mitigation in newsvendor networks: Resource diversification, flexibility, sharing, and hedging. Management Sci. 53(8):1269–1288.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang JJD, Zender JF (2002) Auctioning divisible goods. Econom. Theory 19(4):673–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Sun P, Véricourt F (2016) Inducing environmental disclosures: A dynamic mechanism design approach. Oper. Res. 64(2):371–389.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Gilland W, Tomlin B (2010) Mitigating supply risk: Dual sourcing or process improvement? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):489–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Wongpom B, Koonawootrittriron S, Elzo MA, Suwanasopee T (2017) Milk yield, fat yield and fat percentage associations in a Thai multibreed dairy population. Agriculture Natural Resources 51(3):218–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Aydin G, Heese HS (2017) Curbing the use of conflict minerals: A supply network perspective. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Bhatt T (2014) A guidance document on the best practices in food traceability. Comprehensive Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety 13(5):1074–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar