Prosocial Compliance in P2P Lending: A Natural Field Experiment

References

• Ai W, Chen R, Chen Y, Mei Q, Phillips W (2016) Recommending teams promotes prosocial lending in online microfinance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113(52):14944–14948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof G (1991) Procrastination and obedience. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):1–19.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1995) Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: The effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Funk P, Iriberri N (2013) Promoting rule compliance in daily-life: Evidence from a randomized field experiment in the public libraries of Barcelona. Eur. Econom. Rev. 64:266–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battigalli P, Dufwenberg M (2007) Guilt in games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):170–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Stillwell AM, Heatherton TF (1994) Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psych. Bull. 115(2):243–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Fielding NG, Clarke A, Witt R, eds. The Economic Dimensions of Crime (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 13–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaduri A (1977) On the formation of usurious interest rates in backward agriculture. Cambridge J. Econom. 1(4):341–352.Google Scholar
• Blumenthal M, Christian C, Slemrod J, Smith MG (2001) Do normative appeals affect tax compliance? Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. Natl. Tax J. 54(1):125–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Frey BS (1999) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):335–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2013) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Fiorin S, Gottlieb D, Kanz M (2015) Moral Incentives: Experimental Evidence from Repayments of an Islamic Credit Card (Social Science Electronic Publishing, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cadena X, Antoinette S (2011) Remembering to pay? Reminders vs. financial incentives for loan payments. NBER Working Paper No. 17020, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74(6):1579–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2011) Participation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1211–1237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Lu F, Zhang J (2017) Social comparisons, status and driving behavior. J. Public Econom. 155:11–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ChinaNews (2013) Microfinancing in China. Accessed October 30, 2016, http://finance.chinanews.com/it/2013/10-30/541716.shtml.Google Scholar
• Cho J (2006) The mechanism of trust and distrust formation and their relational outcomes. J. Retailing 82(1):25–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CreditEase (2011) 2011—A report on micro- and small-enterprises’s management and financing). Accessed May 1, 2017, http://www.creditease.cn/special2011/xwzt.Google Scholar
• Crockett MJ, Kurth-Nelson Z, Siegel JZ, Dayan P, Dolan RJ (2014) Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111(48):17320–17325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai Z, Galeotti F, Villeval MC (2018) Cheating in the lab predicts fraud in the field: An experiment in public transportations. Management Sci. 64(3):1081–1100.Link, Google Scholar
• Davenport TC, Gerber AS, Green DP, Larimer CW, Mann CB, Panagopoulos C (2010) The enduring effects of social pressure: Tracking campaign experiments over a series of elections. Political Behav. 32(3):423–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du N, Shahriar Q (2018) Cheap-talk evaluations in contract design. Working paper, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
• Duarte J, Siegel S, Young L (2012) Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2455–2483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Kirchsteiger G (2004) A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. 47(2):268–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dugar S (2010) Nonmonetary sanctions and rewards in an experimental coordination game. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 73(3):377–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel E, Grossman P (1998) Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Econom. J. 108(448):726–735.Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2008) Anticipated verbal feedback induces pro-social behavior. Evolution Human Behav. 29(2):100–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Kosfeld M (2006) The hidden cost of control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1611–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Rockenbach B (2003) Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature 422(6928):137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Klein A, Schmidts KM (2007) Fairness and contract design. Econometrica 75(1):121–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fellner G, Sausgruber R, Traxler C (2013) Testing enforcement strategies in the field: Threat, moral appeal and social information. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):634–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Föllmi-Heusi F (2013) Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):525–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freedman S, Jin GZ (2008) Do social networks solve information problems for peer-to-peer lending? Evidence from Prosper.com. NET Institute Working Paper No. 08-43, Indiana University, Bloomington: School of Public & Environmental Affairs Research Paper No. 2008-11-06, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Freedman S, Jin GZ (2016) The information value of online social networks: Lessons from peer-to-peer lending. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 51:185–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao Q, Lin M, Sias RW (2018) Words Matter: The Role of Texts in Online Credit Markets (Social Science Electronic Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Rogers T (2009) Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. J. Politics 71(1):178–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill J (2018) Comments from the new editor. Political Anal. 26(1):1–2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree J, Zhang J (2014) Communication and competition. Experiment. Econom. 17(3):421–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallsworth M, List JA, Metcalfe RD, Vlaev I (2014) The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. J. Public Econom. 148:14–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallsworth M, List JA, Metcalfe RD, Vlaev I (2015) The making of Homo honoratus: From omission to commission. NBER Working Paper No. 21210, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hermes N, Lensink R (2007) The empirics of microfinance: What do we know? Econom. J. 117(517):1–10.Google Scholar
• Herzenstein M, Dholakia UM, Andrews RL (2011a) Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. J. Interactive Marketing 25(1):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herzenstein M, Sonenshein S, Dholakia UM (2011b) Tell me a good story and I may lend you money: The role of narratives in peer-to-peer lending decisions. J. Marketing Res. 48(SPL):138–149.Google Scholar
• Hinkle JC, Weisburd D (2008) The irony of broken windows policing: A micro-place study of the relationship between disorder, focused police crackdowns and fear of crime. J. Criminal Justice 36(6):503–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith VL (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):653–660.Google Scholar
• Hoffman E, McCabe KA, Shachat K, Smith VL (1994) Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games Econom. Behav. 7(3):346–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurkens S, Kartik N (2009) Would I lie to you? On social preferences and lying aversion. Experiment. Econom. 12(2):180–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kachelmeier S, Shehata M (1997) Internal auditing and voluntary cooperation in firms: A cross-cultural experiment. Accounting Rev. 72(3):407–431.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (2013) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. MacLean LC, Ziemba WT, eds. Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore), 99–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, Morten M, Zinman J (2016a) A personal touch in text messaging can improve microloan repayment. Behav. Sci. Policy 1(2):25–31.Google Scholar
• Karlan D, McConnell M, Mullainathan S, Zinman J (2016b) Getting to the top of mind: How reminders increase saving. Management Sci. 62(12):3393–3411.Link, Google Scholar
• Kleven HJ, Knudsen MB, Kreiner CT, Pedersen S, Saez E (2011) Unwilling or unable to cheat? Evidence from a randomized tax audit experiment in Denmark. Econometrica 79(3):651–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krumme KA, Herrero S (2009) Lending behavior and community structure in an online peer-to-peer economic network. Proc. Internat. Conf. Computational Sci. Engrg. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, DC), 613–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrimore L, Jiang L, Larrimore J, Markowitz D, Gorski S (2011) Peer to peer lending: The relationship between language features, trustworthiness, and persuasion success. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 39(1):19–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin IP, Snyder MA, Chapman DP (1988) The interaction of experiential and situational factors and gender in a simulated risky decision-making task. J. Psych. 122(2):173–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Viswanathan S (2015) Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Sci. 62(5):1393–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–35.Link, Google Scholar
• List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2016) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. NBER Working Paper No. 21875, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lu F, Zhang J, Perloff JM (2016) General and specific information in deterring traffic violations: Evidence from a randomized experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 123:97–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Wittkowski K, Fang Z, Aspara J (2017) Consumer debt collection with social pressure and financial incentives: Field experiments. Working paper, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masclet D, Noussair C, Tucker S, Villeval M-C (2003) Monetary and non-monetary punishment in the VCM. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):366–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley (2015) Global marketplace lending: Disruptive innovation in financials. Accessed August 2, 2017, https://bebeez.it/wp-content/blogs.dir/5825/files/2015/06/GlobalMarketplaceLending.pdf.Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393(6685):573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pekonen P (2014) Are text message reminders effective in debt collection? Randomized controlled trial in debt collection in Finland. Accessed May 22, 2017, https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/14613.Google Scholar
• Perez-Truglia R, Troiano U (2015) Shaming tax delinquents: Theory and evidence from a field experiment in the United States. NBER Working Paper No. 21264, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2011) What’s in a picture? Evidence of discrimination from Prosper.com. J. Human Resources 46(1):53–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravina E (2008) Beauty, personal characteristics, and trust in credit markets. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Slemrod J, Blumenthal M, Christian C (2001) Taxpayer response to an increased probability of audit: Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota. J. Public Economics 79(3):455–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith A (2009) The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Penguin Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(3):393–410.Google Scholar
• Vanberg C (2008) Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica 76(6):1467–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verduyn P, Lavrijsen S (2015) Which emotions last longest and why: The role of event importance and rumination. Motivation Emotion 39(1):119–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verduyn P, Van Mechelen I, Kross E, Chezzi C, Van Bever F (2012) The relationship between self-distancing and the duration of negative and positive emotional experiences in daily life. Emotion 12(6):1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Lin M (2016) Market mechanisms in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 63(12):4236–4257.Link, Google Scholar
• Wenzel M, Taylor N (2004) An experimental evaluation of tax-reporting schedules: A case of evidence-based tax administration. J. Public Econom. 88(12):2785–2799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodyatt L (2015) The power of public shaming, for good and for ill. Accessed March 12, 2017, http://theconversation.com/the-power-of-public-shaming-for-good-and-for-ill-38920.Google Scholar
• Xiao E, Houser D (2009) Avoiding the sharp tongue: Anticipated written messages promote fair economic exchange. J. Econom. Psych. 30(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar