Reducing Capital Market Anomaly: The Role of Information Technology Using an Information Uncertainty Lens

References

• Abarbanell JS, Bernard V (1992) Tests of analysts overreaction/underreaction to earnings information as an explanation for anomalous stock price behavior. J. Finance 47:1181–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ali A, Klein A, Rosenfeld J (1992) Analysts’ use of information about permanent and transitory earnings components in forecasting annual EPS. Accounting Rev. 67:183–198.Google Scholar
• Anderson MC, Banker RD, Ravindran S (2006) Value implication of investments in information technology. Management Sci. 52:1359–1376.Link, Google Scholar
• Ball R, Brown P (1968) An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. J. Accounting Res. 6:159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Manso G (2017) Independent boards and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 123:536–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barki H, Pinsonneault A (2005) A model of organizational integration, implementation effort, and performance. Organ. Sci. 16:165–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Barry CB, Brown SJ (1985) Differential information and security market equilibrium. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 20:407–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard VL, Thomas JK (1990) Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings. J. Accounting Econom. 13:305–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24:169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A, Keil M, Mähring M (2009) Effects of information technology failures on the market value of firms. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 18:66–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhushan R (1989) Firm characteristics and analyst following. J. Accounting Econom. 11:255–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bondt WF, Thaler R (1985) Does the stock market overreact? J. Finance 40:793–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brazel JF, Agoglia CP (2007) An examination of auditor planning judgments in a complex accounting information system environment. Contemporary Accounting Res. 24:1059–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brazel JF, Dang L (2008) The effect of ERP system implementations on the management of earnings and earnings release dates. J. Inform. Systems 22:1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brealey RA, Myers SC (2002) Principles of Corporate Finance (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Brown GW (1999) Volatility, sentiment, and noise traders. Financial Analysts J. 55:82–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell SD, Sharpe SA (2009) Anchoring bias in consensus forecasts and its effect on market prices. J. Financial Quantitative Analysis 44:369–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan K, Hameed A (2006) Stock price synchronicity and analyst coverage in emerging markets. J. Financial Econom. 80:115–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Richardson V, Zmud R (2001) Examining the shareholder wealth effects of announcements of newly created CIO positions. MIS Quart. 25:43–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer KL, Melville NP (2010) Does technological progress alter the nature of IT as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. 21:392–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Cotteleer MJ, Bendoly E (2006) Order lead-time improvement following enterprise information technology implementation: An empirical study. MIS Quart. 30:643–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Hirshleifer D, Subrahmanyam A (1998) Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions. J. Finance 53:1839–1885.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport TH (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76:121–131.Google Scholar
• Dehning B, Richardson VJ, Zmud RW (2007) The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management systems in manufacturing firms. J. Oper. Management 25:806–824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Ren F (2011) Information technology and firm boundaries: Impact on firm risk and return performance. Inform. Systems Res. 22:369–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Michael SC, Min CK (1998) Firm characteristics and investments in information technology: Scale and scope effects. Inform. Systems Res. 9:219–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Diether KB, Malloy CJ, Scherbina A (2002) Difference of opinion and the cross section of stock returns. J. Finance 57:2113–2141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorantes CA, Li C, Peters GF, Richardson VJ (2013) The effect of enterprise systems implementations on the firm information environment. Contemporary Accounting Res. 30:1427–1461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duru A, Reeb DM (2002) International diversification and analysts’ forecast accuracy and bias. Accounting Rev. 77:415–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E (1965) The behavior of stock market prices. J. Bus. 38:34–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, French KR (1996) Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. J. Finance 51:55–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forsyth J, Teoh SH, Zhang Y (2007) Misvaluation, CEO equity-based compensation, and corporate governance. Working paper, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA.Google Scholar
• Foster G, Olsen C, Shevlin T (1984) Earnings releases, anomalies, and the behavior of security returns. Accounting Rev. 59:574–603.Google Scholar
• Francis J, Schipper K (1999) Have financial statements lost their relevance? J. Accounting Res. 37:319–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francis J, LaFond R, Olsson P, Schipper K (2007) Information uncertainty and the post-earnings-announcement drift. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 34:403–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RN, Tse S (1989) The multiperiod information content of accounting earnings: Confirmations and contradictions of previous earnings reports. J. Accounting Res. 27:49–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gattiker TF, Goodhue DL (2005) What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quart. 29:559–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hau H, Lai S (2013) Real effects of stock underpricing. J. Financial Econom. 108:392–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35:519–530.Google Scholar
• Healy PM, Palepu KG (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. J. Accounting Econom. 31:405–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR, Stratman JK (2007) The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: A study of ERP, SCM, and CRM system implementations. J. Oper. Management 25:65–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D (2001) Investor psychology and asset pricing. J. Finance 56:1533–1597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber D (2016) The myth of protecting the public interest: The case of missing mandate in federal securities laws. J. Bus. Securities Law 16:402–422.Google Scholar
• Hutton AP, Marcus AJ, Tehranian H (2009) Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. J. Financial Econom. 94:67–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. J. Finance 48:65–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang G, Lee C, Zhang Y (2005) Information uncertainty and expected returns. Rev. Accounting Stud. 10:185–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kobelsky KW, Richardson VJ, Smith RE, Zmud RW (2008) Determinants and consequences of firm information technology budgets. Accounting Rev. 83:957–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Grover V (2008) Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9:23–39.Google Scholar
• Kothari SP (2001) Capital markets research in accounting. J. Accounting Econom. 31:105–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert R, Leuz C, Verrecchia R (2007) Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. J. Accounting Res. 45:385–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang M, Lundholm R (1996) Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behaviour. Accounting Rev. 71:467–492.Google Scholar
• Lee HL (2004) The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82:102–112.Google Scholar
• Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Rev. 38:93–102.Google Scholar
• Lemmon M, Roberts M (2010) The response of corporate financing and investment to changes in the supply of credit. J. Financial Quantitative Analysis 45:555–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt A (1999) Speech by SEC chairman: Quality information: The lifeblood of our markets. Accessed September 20, 2016, https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speecharchive/1999/spch304.htm.Google Scholar
• Li C, Peters GF, Richardson VJ, Watson MW (2012) The consequences of information technology control weaknesses on management information systems: The case of Sarbanes-Oxley internal control reports. MIS Quart. 36:179–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mabert VA, Soni AK, Venkataramanan MA (2003) The impact of organization size on enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations in the US manufacturing sector. OMEGA 31:235–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Axline S, Petrie D, Tanis C (2000) Learning from adopters’ experiences with ERP: Problems encountered and success achieved. J. Inform. Technology 15:245–265.Google Scholar
• Mendenhall R (1991) Evidence of possible underweighting of earnings-related information. J. Accounting Res. 29:170–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W (1994) The dynamics of evolving markets: The effect of business sales and age on dissolutions and divestitures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39:575–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti A, Mitchell W (2013) How firms competitive environment and digital strategy posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Quart. 37:511–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay T, Kekre S (2002) Strategic and operational benefits of electronic integration in B2B procurement processes. Management Sci. 48:1301–1313.Link, Google Scholar
• Park K, Kusiak A (2005) Enterprise resource planning (ERP) operations support system for maintaining process integration. Internat. J. Production Res. 49:3959–3982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PeopleSoft (2005) Customer Relationship Management Customer Success Profiles (PeopleSoft, Pleasanton, CA).Google Scholar
• Pincus M, Tian F, Wellmeyer P, Xu S (2017) Do clients’ enterprise systems affect audit quality and efficiency? Contemporary Accounting Res. 34:1975–2021.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Millar VE (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. 63:149–174.Google Scholar
• Ranganathan C, Brown CV (2006) ERP investments and the market value of firms: Toward an understanding of influential ERP project variables. Inform. Systems Res. 17:145–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Reisinger D (2014) Gartner foresees strong IT spending into 2015: 10 key data points. Accessed September 20, 2016, http://www.eweek.com/it-management/slideshows/gartner-foresees-strong-it-spending-into-2015-10-key-data-points.html.Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27:237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer FM, Ross D (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd ed. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Stratman JK (2001) Information integration for supply chain management: An empirical investigation of ERP systems in manufacturing. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
• Tian F, Xu SX (2015) How do enterprise resource planning systems affect firm risk? Post-implementation impact. MIS Quart. 39:39–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weill P, Ross JW (2009) IT Savvy: What Top Executives Must Know to Go from Pain to Gain (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Systems Res. 16:85–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Zhu KX (2012) Do electronic linkages reduce the bullwhip effect? An empirical analysis of the U.S. manufacturing supply chains. Inform. Systems Res. 23:1042–1055.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang XF (2006) Information uncertainty and stock returns. J. Finance 61:105–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao XF (2017) Does information intensity matter for stock returns? Evidence from Form 8-K filings. Management Sci. 63:1382–1404.Link, Google Scholar