Learning When to Stop Searching

References

• Alpern S, Baston V (2017) The secretary problem with a selection committee: Do conformist committees hire better secretaries? Management Sci. 63(4):1184–1197.Link, Google Scholar
• Alqallaf F, Gustafson P (2001) On cross-validation of Bayesian models. Canadian J. Statist. 29(2):333–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN (2006) A new secretary problem with rank-based selection and cardinal payoffs. J. Math. Psych. 50(1):58–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Rapoport A, Murphy RO (2006) Sequential observation and selection with rank-dependent payoffs: An experimental study. Management Sci. 52(9):1437–1449.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Campbell J, Lee MD (2006) The effect of feedback and financial reward on human performance solving secretaryproblems. Ron Sun R, Naomi Miyake N, eds. Proc. Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX) 1068–1073.Google Scholar
• Corbin RM, Olson CL, Abbondanza M (1975) Context effects in optional stopping decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 14(2):207–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Levinthal D (2009) Near-term liability of exploitation: Exploration and exploitation in multistage problems. Organ. Sci. 20(3):538–551.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferguson TS (1989) Who solved the secretary problem? Statist. Sci. 4(3):282–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman PR (1983) The secretary problem and its extensions: A review. Internat. Statist. Rev. 51(2):189–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert JP, Mosteller F (1966) Recognizing the maximum of a sequence. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 61(313):35–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree JK, Holt CA (2001) Ten little treasures of game theory and ten intuitive contradictions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1402–1422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan M, Lee MD (2017) The effect of goals and environments on human performance in optimal stopping problems. Decision 5(4):339–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guan M, Lee M, Silva A (2014) Threshold models of human decision making on optimal stoppingproblems in different environments. Bello P, McShane M, Guarini M, Scassellati B, eds. Proc. 36th Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX).Google Scholar
• Guan M, Lee MD, Vandekerckhove J (2015) A hierarchical cognitive threshold model of human decision making on different length optimal stopping problems. Noelle DC, Dale R, Warlaumont AS, Yoshimi J, Matlock T, Jennings CD, Maglio PP, eds. Proc. 37th Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX).Google Scholar
• Hill BM (1968) Posterior distribution of percentiles: Bayes’ theorem for sampling from a population. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 63(322):677–691.Google Scholar
• Jeffreys H (1935) Some tests of significance, treated by the theory of probability. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 31 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 203–222.Google Scholar
• Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of Probability (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
• Kahan JP, Rapoport A, Jones LV (1967) Decision making in a sequential search task. Perceptions Psychophysics 2(8):374–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes factors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(430):773–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruschke J (2015) Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan, 2nd ed. (Academic Press Waltham, MA).Google Scholar
• Lee MD (2006) A hierarchical Bayesian model of human decision-making on an optimal stopping problem. Cognitive Sci. 30(3):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MD, OConnor TA, Welsh MB (2004) Decision-making on the full informationsecretary problem. Forbus K, Gentner D, Regier T, eds. Proc. 26th Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX), 819–824.Google Scholar
• Mahdian M, Mcafee RP, Pennock D (2008) The secretary problem with a hazard rate condition. Proc. 4th Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom. (Springer, New York), 708–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neal RM (2003) Slice sampling. Ann. Statist. 31(3):705–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palley AB, Kremer M (2014) Sequential search and learning from rank feedback: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci. 60(10):2525–2542.Link, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Tversky A (1970) Choice behavior in an optional stopping task. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 5(2):105–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rieskamp J, Otto PE (2006) SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. J. Experiment. Psych. General 135(2):207–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2013) Response time and decision making: An experimental study. Judgment Decision Making 8(5):540–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvatier J, Wiecki TV, Fonnesbeck C (2016) Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2:e55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale DA, Rapoport A (1997) Sequential decision making with relative ranks: An experimental investigation of the “secretary problem.” Organ. Behav. Human Decision Proces. 69(3):221–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todd PM (1997) Searching for the next best mate. Conte R, Hegselmann R, Terna P, eds. Simulating Social Phenomena, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Springer, Berlin), 419–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers EJ, Lee M, Rouder J, Morey R (2019) Another statistical paradox. Working paper, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Worthy DA, Maddox WT (2014) A comparison model of reinforcement-learning and win-stay-lose-shift decision-making processes: A tribute to W. K. Estes. J. Math. Psych. 59:41–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zwick R, Rapoport A, Lo AKC, Muthukrishnan A (2003) Consumer sequential search: Not enough or too much? Marketing Sci. 22(4):503–519.Link, Google Scholar