How Do You Search for the Best Alternative? Experimental Evidence on Search Strategies to Solve Complex Problems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3247

References

  • Alavi M (1994) Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 18(2):159–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden JN, Rapoport A, Murphy RO (2006) Sequential observation and selection with rank-dependent payoffs: An experimental study. Management Sci. 52(9):1437–1449.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bendoly E (2011) Linking task conditions to physiology and judgment errors in RM systems. Production Oper. Management 20(6):860–876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bendoly E (2014) Systems dynamics understanding in project execution: Information sharing quality and psychological safety. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1352–1369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billinger S, Stielglitz N, Schumacher TR (2014) Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organ. Sci. 25(1):93–108.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blum C, Roli A (2003) Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Comput. Surveys 35(3):268–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Weber M (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):325–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TH, Mihm J, Sosa M (2017) Revisiting the role of collaboration in creating breakthrough innovation. Working paper, Goizuetta School of Business, Emory University.Google Scholar
  • Chao R, Kavadias S (2008) A theoretical framework for managing the NPD portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets. Management Sci. 54(5):907–921.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chao R, Lipson M, Loutskina E (2012) How organizational complexity impacts R&D portfolio decisions and technological search distance. Working paper, Darden School of Business.Google Scholar
  • Clark J (1998) Fairness preferences and optimization skills: Are they substitutes? An experimental investigation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 34(4):541–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahan E, Mendelson H (2001) An extreme value model of concept testing. Management Sci. 47(1):102–116.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH (1971) A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 7(4):466–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diehl M, Stroebe W (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 53(3):497–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay-for-performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erat S (2017) Making the best even better: The role of idea pool structure. Production Oper. Management 26(10):1946–1959.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erat S, Kavadias S (2008) Sequential testing of product designs: Implications from learning. Management Sci. 54(5):956–968.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erat S, Krishnan V (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallupe RB, Bastianutti LM, Cooper WH (1991) Unlocking brainstorms. J. Appl. Psych. 76(1):137–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich K (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey S, Kou C (2013) Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):346–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heller P, Keith R, Anderson S (1992) Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group vs. individual problem solving. Amer. J. Physics 60(7):627–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchison-Krupat J, Kavadias S (2015) Strategic resource allocation: Top-down, bottom-up, and the value of strategic buckets. Management Sci. 61(2):391–412.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kanagaraj G, Ponnambalam SG, Jawahar N, Mukund J (2014) An effective hybrid cuckoo search and genetic algorithm for constrained engineering design optimization. Engrg. Optim. 46(10):1331–1351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman SA, Lobo J, McCready WG (2000) Optimal search on a technology landscape. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 43(2):141–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kavadias S, Sommer S (2009) The effects of problem structure and team diversity on brainstorming effectiveness. Management Sci. 55(12):1899–1913.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn NW, Smith SM (2011) Collaborative fixation: Effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 25(3):359–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kornish LJ, Ulrich KT (2011) Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. 57(1):107–128.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laughlin PR, Hatch EC, Silver JS, Boh L (2006) Groups perform better than the best individuals on letter-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(4):644–651.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loch CH, Terwiesch C, Thomke S (2001) Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. 45(5):663–678.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osborn AF (1953) Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving, 3rd revised ed. (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Paulus PB, Dzindolet MT (1993) Social influence processes in group brainstorming. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(4):575–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paulus PB, Brown V, Ortega AH (1996) Group creativity. Purser RE, Montuori A, eds. Social Creativity in Organizations (Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ), 151–176.Google Scholar
  • Pich MT, Loch CH, De Meyer A (2002) On uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity in project management. Management Sci. 48(8):1008–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reinig BA, Bongsik S (2002) The dynamic effects of group support systems on group meetings. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(2):303–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robbins SP, Judge TA (2007) Organizational Behavior (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Sawyer RK (2007) Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration (Basic Books, Perseus Books Group, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Shore J, Bernstein E, Lazer D (2015) Facts and figuring: An experimental investigation of network structure and performance in information and solution spaces. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1432–1446.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1969) The Science of the Artificial, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of technological breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sommer S, Loch C (2004) Selectionism and learning in project with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Sci. 50(10):1334–1347.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sting FJ, Mihm J, Loch CH (2016). Collaborative search. INSEAD Working Paper No. 2016/60/TOM, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
  • Stroebe W, Diehl M (1994) Why are group members less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 5(1):271–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton RI, Hargadon A (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):685–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wason PC (1966) Reasoning. Foss BM, ed. New Horizons in Psychology (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK), 135–151.Google Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooten JO (2013) Innovation tournaments: Improving ideas through process models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.